The Collaborative Chronic Care Model for Mental Health Conditions: From Evidence Synthesis to Policy Impact to Scale-up and Spread
- PMID: 31517791
- PMCID: PMC6749976
- DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001145
The Collaborative Chronic Care Model for Mental Health Conditions: From Evidence Synthesis to Policy Impact to Scale-up and Spread
Abstract
Background: Extensive evidence indicates that Collaborative Chronic Care Models (CCMs) improve outcome in chronic medical conditions and depression treated in primary care. Beginning with an evidence synthesis which indicated that CCMs are also effective for multiple mental health conditions, we describe a multistage process that translated this knowledge into evidence-based health system change in the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).
Evidence synthesis: In 2010, recognizing that there had been numerous CCM trials for a wide variety of mental health conditions, we conducted an evidence synthesis compiling randomized controlled trials of CCMs for any mental health condition. The systematic review demonstrated CCM effectiveness across mental health conditions and treatment venues. Cumulative meta-analysis and meta-regression further informed our approach to subsequent CCM implementation.
Policy impact: In 2015, based on the evidence synthesis, VA Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention (OMHSP) adopted the CCM as the model for their outpatient mental health teams.
Randomized implementation trial: In 2015-2018 we partnered with OMHSP to conduct a 9-site stepped wedge implementation trial, guided by insights from the evidence synthesis.
Scale-up and spread: In 2017 OMHSP launched an effort to scale-up and spread the CCM to additional VA medical centers. Seventeen facilitators were trained and 28 facilities engaged in facilitation.
Discussion: Evidence synthesis provided leverage for evidence-based policy change. This formed the foundation for a health care leadership/researcher partnership, which conducted an implementation trial and subsequent scale-up and spread effort to enhance adoption of the CCM, as informed by the evidence synthesis.
Conflict of interest statement
M.S.B.: receives royalties from Springer Publishing and New Harbinger Publishing for books related to the Collaborative Chronic Care Model for individuals with bipolar disorder. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Institute of Medicine. Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2012. Available at: www.nap.edu/read/13444/chapter/3. Accessed December 27, 2018. - PubMed
-
- Atkins D, Kilbourne AM, Shulkin D. Moving from discovery to system-wide change: the role of research in a learning health care system: experience from three decades of health systems research in the Veterans Health Administration. Ann Rev Public Health. 2017;38:467–487. - PubMed
-
- Kessler RC, Wang PS. The descriptive epidemiology of commonly occurring mental disorders in the United States. Ann Rev Public Health. 2008;29:115–129. - PubMed
-
- Hogan MF. New freedom commission report: The President’s New Freedom Commission: recommendations to transform mental health care in America. Psychiatr Serv. 2003;54:1467–1474. - PubMed
-
- Watkins KE, Pincus HA, Paddock S, et al. Care for veterans with mental and substance use disorders: good performance, but room to improve on many measures. Health Aff. 2011;30:2194–2203. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
