Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 13;69(Suppl 3):S214-S220.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz614.

Common Behaviors and Faults When Doffing Personal Protective Equipment for Patients With Serious Communicable Diseases

Affiliations

Common Behaviors and Faults When Doffing Personal Protective Equipment for Patients With Serious Communicable Diseases

Joel M Mumma et al. Clin Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: The safe removal of personal protective equipment (PPE) can limit transmission of serious communicable diseases, but this process poses challenges to healthcare workers (HCWs).

Methods: We observed 41 HCWs across 4 Ebola treatment centers in Georgia doffing PPE for simulated patients with serious communicable diseases. Using human factors methodologies, we obtained the details, sequences, and durations of doffing steps; identified the ways each step can fail (failure modes [FMs]); quantified the riskiness of FMs; and characterized the workload of doffing steps.

Results: Eight doffing steps were common to all hospitals-removal of boot covers, gloves (outer and inner pairs), the outermost garment, the powered air purifying respirator (PAPR) hood, and the PAPR helmet assembly; repeated hand hygiene (eg, with hand sanitizer); and a final handwashing with soap and water. Across hospitals, we identified 256 FMs during the common doffing steps, 61 of which comprised 19 common FMs. Most of these common FMs were above average in their riskiness at each hospital. At all hospitals, hand hygiene, removal of the outermost garment, and removal of boot covers were above average in their overall riskiness. Measurements of workload revealed that doffing steps were often mentally demanding, and this facet of workload correlated most strongly with the effortfulness of a doffing step.

Conclusions: We systematically identified common points of concern in protocols for doffing high-level PPE. Addressing FMs related to hand hygiene and the removal of the outermost garment, boot covers, and PAPR hood could improve HCW safety when doffing high-level PPE.We identified ways that doffing protocols for high-level personal protective equipment may fail to protect healthcare workers. Hand hygiene, removing the outermost garment, boot covers, and respirator hood harbored the greatest risk and failed in similar ways across different hospitals.

Keywords: serious communicable disease; human factors; occupational health; personal protective equipment; risk analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Median duration of the common doffing steps at each site. Note. “Wash hands” refers to cleaning hands with soap and water. At site B, handwashing was done as part of showering and was not observed. At site D, the trained observer removed the healthcare worker’s outermost garment. Abbreviation: PAPR, powered air purifying respirator.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Standardized sums of risk indices of the common doffing steps at each site. Values are standard deviations above (positive values) or below (negative values) the mean sum of risk indices of individual doffing steps at each site. At site B, handwashing was done as part of showering and was not observed. At site D, the trained observer removed the healthcare worker’s outermost garment. Note: “Wash hands” refers to cleaning hands with soap and water. Abbreviation: PAPR, powered air purifying respirator.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014, October 20). CDC Tightened Guidance for U.S. Healthcare Workers on Personal Protective Equipment for Ebola. Retrieved 18 May 2017, from https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2014/fs1020-ebola-personal-protective...
    1. Gurses AP, Rosen MA, Pronovost PJ. Improving guideline compliance and healthcare safety using human factors engineering: the case of Ebola. J Patient Saf Risk Manag 2018; 23:93–5.
    1. Narra R, Sobel J, Piper C, et al. . CDC safety training course for Ebola virus disease healthcare workers. EID 2017; 23(Suppl 1):S217. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Edmond MB, Diekema DJ, Perencevich EN. Ebola virus disease and the need for new personal protective equipment. JAMA 2014; 312:2495–6. - PubMed
    1. Kwon JH, Burnham CD, Reske KA, et al. . Assessment of healthcare worker protocol deviations and self-contamination during personal protective equipment donning and doffing. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017; 38:1077–83. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms