Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan:100:106107.
doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106107. Epub 2019 Aug 20.

Evaluating the influences of social support and smoking cues on daily smoking abstinence among socioeconomically disadvantaged adults

Affiliations

Evaluating the influences of social support and smoking cues on daily smoking abstinence among socioeconomically disadvantaged adults

Joseph J C Waring et al. Addict Behav. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: Perceived social support and smoking cues, such as cigarette availability, are important factors that affect smoking cessation outcomes. However, very few studies examine the influences of social support and smoking cues on lapse during a quit attempt.

Methods: Socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers participating in a smoking cessation program at a safety net hospital completed smartphone-based ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) for two consecutive weeks (1-week pre-quit through 1-week post-quit). A mixed-effects logistic regression model was used to evaluate whether perceived support to quit smoking, perceived pressure to quit smoking, and situational cues (i.e., being offered a cigarette) were related to the likelihood of reporting smoking cigarettes on any EMA within a day.

Results: Perceived social pressure and support to quit were not related to daily smoking status. Participants were more likely to smoke on days when they were offered a cigarette compared to days when no such event occurred (OR = 3.31 [95% CI = 1.21, 9.06]). This effect was also significant after adjusting for perceived social pressure to quit and support to quit (OR = 3.38 [95% CI = 1.23, 9.31]).

Conclusion: The results suggest that being offered a cigarette negatively impacts smoking cessation. The results reinforce the need for including cigarette refusal skills in smoking cessation treatment to reduce the likelihood of smoking lapse among socioeconomically disadvantaged adults.

Keywords: Ecological momentary assessment; Smoking cessation; Smoking cues; Social support.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Barrera M (1986). Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14(4), 413–445. 10.1007/BF00922627. - DOI
    1. Bolman C, Verboon P, Thewissen V, et al. (2017). Predicting smoking lapses in the first week of quitting. Journal of Addiction Medicine, 1 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000365. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Businelle M, Kendzor DE, Reitzel LR, et al. (2010). Mechanisms linking socioeconomic status to smoking cessation: A structural equation modeling approach. Health Psychology, 29(3), 262–273. 10.1037/a0019285.Mechanisms. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Businelle MS, Ma P, Kendzor DE, et al. (2016). Using intensive longitudinal data collected via Mobile phone to detect imminent lapse in smokers undergoing a scheduled quit attempt. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(10), e275 10.2196/jmir.6307. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ford P, Clifford A, Gussy K, et al. (2013). A systematic review of peer-support programs for smoking cessation in disadvantaged groups. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(11), 5507–5522. 10.3390/ijerph10115507. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types