Looking for insight: The role of parasite tester opinions in farm management

Abstract

Gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) infections cause millions of dollars of economic loss annually. Increasing cases of anthelmintic resistance have resulted in calls for restricted drug use and implementation of sustainable management practices to slow the rate of resistance. The limited uptake of available management systems and advice has sparked multiple surveys into the psychology and behaviours preventing uptake. These surveys have looked mainly at the farmers, the majority of whom have reported they rely on the advice of their local veterinarian or suppliers for treatment and management. However, there is little research into the psychology of veterinarians and people performing animal health testing on this topic. In the current study, a short survey of people performing faecal egg counts on animals was conducted. The survey focused on identifying areas for improving diagnosis to encourage uptake, and found other areas of interest worth further investigation. Respondents most frequently named manual labour as the main contributor to the cost of testing (65% of respondents) with analysis (42%) and sample preparation (32%) being the main contributors to time. In the survey comments, there was little consistency or commonality in the issues raised. The disparity between onsite and laboratory testers is an area worth investigation, particularly into how to co-ordinate behaviour and advice between proactive farmers and parasitology/veterinary services. Further investigation could provide better insight into how to encourage and maintain sustainable practices on farms.

Keywords: Diagnostics; Faecal egg count; Gastrointestinal nematodes; Opinion survey.