Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 13;9(9):e031607.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031607.

The proximal hamstring avulsion clinical trial (PHACT)-a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial of operative versus non-operative treatment of proximal hamstrings avulsions: study protocol

Affiliations

The proximal hamstring avulsion clinical trial (PHACT)-a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial of operative versus non-operative treatment of proximal hamstrings avulsions: study protocol

Elsa Pihl et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: The treatment of proximal hamstring avulsions is controversial. While several trials have investigated the outcome for patients treated surgically, there is today no prospective trial comparing operative treatment with non-operative treatment. This protocol describes the design for the proximal hamstring avulsion clinical trial (PHACT)-the first randomised controlled trial of operative versus non-operative treatment for proximal hamstring avulsions.

Methods and analysis: PHACT is a multicentre randomised controlled trial conducted across Sweden, Norway and Finland. Eligible patients (60 participants/treatment arm) with a proximal hamstring avulsion of at least two of three tendons will be randomised to either operative or non-operative treatment. Participants allocated to surgery will undergo reinsertion of the tendons with suture anchors. The rehabilitation programme will be the same for both treatment groups. When patient or surgeon equipoise for treatment alternatives cannot be reached and randomisation therefore is not possible, patients will be invited to participate in a parallel observational non-randomised cohort. The primary outcome will be the patient-reported outcome measure Perth hamstring assessment tool at 24 months. Secondary outcomes include the Lower Extremity Functional Score, physical performance and muscle strength tests, patient satisfaction and MR imaging. Data analysis will be blinded and intention-to-treat analysis will be preformed.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval has been granted by the Ethical Committee of Uppsala University (DNR: 2017-170) and by the Norwegian ethical board (REC: 2017/1911). The study will be conducted in agreement with the Helsinki declaration. The findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications.

Trial registration number: NCT03311997.

Keywords: MRI; hamstring; hamstring tendons; muscle strength; patient-reported outcome meassure; randomized controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Nothing to declare

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart. This study illustrates the study design. IPAQ-SF, short form of International Physical Activity Questionnaire; LEFS, Lower Extremity Functional Scale; PHAT, Perth hamstring assessment tool. RCT, Randomised Controled Trial.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bodendorfer BM, Curley AJ, Kotler JA, et al. . Outcomes after operative and Nonoperative treatment of proximal hamstring Avulsions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2017;363546517732526. - PubMed
    1. van der Made AD, Wieldraaijer T, Kerkhoffs GM, et al. . The hamstring muscle complex. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 2015;23:2115–22. 10.1007/s00167-013-2744-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chahal J, Bush-Joseph CA, Chow A, et al. . Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging outcomes after surgical repair of complete proximal hamstring ruptures. Am J Sports Med 2012;40:2325–30. 10.1177/0363546512453298 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hofmann KJ, Paggi A, Connors D, et al. . Complete avulsion of the proximal hamstring insertion: functional outcomes after nonsurgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:1022–5. 10.2106/JBJS.M.01074 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Skaara HE, Moksnes H, Frihagen F, et al. . Self-Reported and performance-based functional outcomes after surgical repair of proximal hamstring avulsions. Am J Sports Med 2013;41:2577–84. 10.1177/0363546513499518 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data