Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2019 Sep 13;36(10):88.
doi: 10.1007/s12032-019-1313-x.

Multicenter prospective study validating the efficacy of a quantitative assessment tool for frailty in patients with urological cancers

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Multicenter prospective study validating the efficacy of a quantitative assessment tool for frailty in patients with urological cancers

Osamu Soma et al. Med Oncol. .

Abstract

We prospectively validate the efficacy of the frailty discriminant score (FDS) in individuals with urological cancers, as there has been growing importance in evaluating frailty in clinical practice. A prospective, multicenter study was conducted from February 2017 to April 2019. We enrolled 258 patients with urological cancers and 301 community-dwelling participants who were assessed for frailty. Frailty was assessed using FDS that includes ten items, such as physical, mental, and blood biochemical tests. The primary outcome was the non-inferiority (margin 5%) of FDS in discriminating patients with urological cancers from controls (Ctrl). The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve for each predictive test were calculated. The secondary endpoints included the prediction of overall survival between patients with urological cancer who have high and low FDS. FDS was significantly higher in patients with urological cancers than that in the Ctrl. The AUROC curves for individuals with non-prostate cancers (such as bladder cancer, upper tract urothelial carcinoma, and renal cell carcinoma; 0.942) and those with prostate cancer (0.943) were within the non-inferior margin. The overall survival values were significantly lower in patients with higher FDS score than in those with lower FDS score. The study met its primary and secondary endpoints. The FDS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing frailty and prognosis in patients with urological cancers.

Keywords: Frailty; Frailty discriminant score; Prostate cancer; Renal cell carcinoma; Urological cancer; Urothelial carcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56 - PubMed
    1. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Jun;54(6):991-1001 - PubMed
    1. BMC Geriatr. 2008 Sep 30;8:24 - PubMed
    1. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009 Aug;64(8):896-901 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2011 Jan 5;305(1):50-8 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources