Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar;133(3):e87-e90.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.08.036. Epub 2019 Sep 12.

Establishing and Maintaining Research Integrity at Academic Institutions: Challenges and Opportunities

Affiliations
Review

Establishing and Maintaining Research Integrity at Academic Institutions: Challenges and Opportunities

Janet D Robishaw et al. Am J Med. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Integrity and trust are essential attributes of medical researchers. Research misconduct represents clear and present dangers to academic institutions and their faculty, residents, students, and staff. To achieve and maintain public trust, medical researchers must achieve and maintain research integrity. To do so requires synchronicity and collaboration between and within academic institutions. Substantial failures to maintain research integrity by institutional leadership will lead to increasing demands to do so from the funding organizations and the general public. This, in turn, will lead to avoidable consequences of substantial penalties, financial and otherwise, adverse publicity, and reputational damage. Researchers must self-regulate to avoid pitfalls, including those created by changes in the medical care delivery system that have decreased the influence of health care providers and increased the influence of outside legal and business interests. Our common goal should be to return public trust in our research enterprise that has done so much good for so many, but requires the establishment and maintenance of vigilance to establish and maintain research integrity.

Keywords: Academic institutions; Research integrity; Transparency.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Brainerd J Rethinking retractions. Science. 2018; 362:390–393. - PubMed
    1. Gunsalus CK, Robinson AD. Nine pitfalls of research misconduct. Nature. 2018; 557:297–299. - PubMed
    1. DeMets DL, Fleming TR, Geller G, Ransohoff DF. Institutional responsibility and the flawed genomic biomarkers at Duke University: A missed opportunity for transparency and accountability. Sci Eng Ethics. 2017; 23(4):1199–1205. - PubMed
    1. Relman AS. Lessons from the Darsee affair. N Engl J Med. 1983; 308:1415–1417. - PubMed
    1. Shaw DM, Erren TC. Ten simple rules for protecting research integrity. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015; 11(10):e1004388. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types