Establishing a health-based recommended occupational exposure limit for nitrous oxide using experimental animal data - A systematic review protocol
- PMID: 31520819
- DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108711
Establishing a health-based recommended occupational exposure limit for nitrous oxide using experimental animal data - A systematic review protocol
Abstract
Nitrous oxide (N 2 O) is widely used as inhalation analgesic and anaesthetic in medical, paramedical, and veterinary practice. Previous evaluations resulted in classification of N 2 O as a possible risk factor for adverse reproductive health outcomes based on evidence from animal data. Available human data were considered inadequate, partly due to the possibility that other risk factors, such as co-exposures to other inhalation anaesthetics may have contributed to the adverse outcomes. As no substantial new human evidence has emerged since previous evaluations, this protocol describes a planned systematic review of the evidence obtained from animal studies. The aim is to assess the available evidence on the effects of N 2 O on reproductive and developmental outcomes in animals to inform a health-based recommended occupational exposure limit (OEL) for N 2 O. Comprehensive search strategies were designed to retrieve animal studies addressing N 2 O exposure from PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Screening of the studies retrieved will be performed by at least two independent reviewers, while discrepancies will be resolved by reaching consensus through repeated review and discussions. Articles will be included according to criteria specified in this protocol. Outcome data relevant for reproduction and development will be extracted and risk of bias will be assessed by two independent reviewers using the SYRCLE's risk of bias tool. Primary reproductive and developmental outcomes of interest will be the number of resorptions, malformations, and birth weight. We will focus on dose-response studies that allow to derive an OEL with the benchmark dose (BMD) approach. Adverse outcomes occurring at doses that are equivalent to the exposures occurring in human occupational settings will be particularly relevant for dose-response modelling. The proposed review has not been performed before. We will follow the procedures specified in this protocol. We will adhere to guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), adapted for animal studies. Ethical approval will not be required, as the review will use existing data available in the public domain.
Keywords: Animal experimentation; Nitrous oxide; OEL; Occupational exposure; Reproductive and developmental toxicity; Systematic review.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Similar articles
-
Establishing a health-based recommended occupational exposure limit for isoflurane using experimental animal data: a systematic review protocol.Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 14;12(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02331-0. Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37710304 Free PMC article.
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Occupational exposure to nitrous oxide - the role of scavenging and ventilation systems in reducing the exposure level in operating rooms.Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2007 Mar;210(2):133-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2006.07.004. Epub 2006 Oct 10. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2007. PMID: 17045524
-
The effect of exposure to long working hours on stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury.Environ Int. 2020 Sep;142:105746. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105746. Epub 2020 Jun 3. Environ Int. 2020. PMID: 32505015
-
Derivation of an occupational exposure limit for diacetyl using dose-response data from a chronic animal inhalation exposure study.J Appl Toxicol. 2019 May;39(5):688-701. doi: 10.1002/jat.3757. Epub 2019 Jan 8. J Appl Toxicol. 2019. PMID: 30620996 Review.
Cited by
-
Improving the quality of toxicology and environmental health systematic reviews: What journal editors can do.ALTEX. 2021;38(3):513-522. doi: 10.14573/altex.2106111. Epub 2021 Jun 22. ALTEX. 2021. PMID: 34164697 Free PMC article.
-
Reviewing the animal literature: how to describe and choose between different types of literature reviews.Lab Anim. 2021 Apr;55(2):129-141. doi: 10.1177/0023677220968599. Epub 2020 Nov 1. Lab Anim. 2021. PMID: 33135562 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a Systematic Review Protocol and a Scoping Review of Ultrasound-Induced Immune Effects in Peripheral Tumors.Mol Imaging Biol. 2022 Apr;24(2):288-297. doi: 10.1007/s11307-021-01686-x. Epub 2021 Nov 29. Mol Imaging Biol. 2022. PMID: 34845660 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials