Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 14;20(1):426.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2811-x.

Abbreviated quantitative UTE imaging in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Affiliations

Abbreviated quantitative UTE imaging in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Takeshi Fukuda et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Existing ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging (UTE MRI) methods require prohibitively long acquisition times (~ 20-40 min) to quantitatively assess the clinically relevant fast decay T2* component in ligaments and tendons. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and clinical translatability of a novel abbreviated quantitative UTE MRI paradigm for monitoring graft remodeling after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Methods: Eight patients who had Graftlink™ hamstring autograft reconstruction were recruited for this prospective study. A 3D double-echo UTE sequence at 3.0 Tesla was performed at 3- and 6-months post-surgery. An abbreviated UTE MRI paradigm was established based on numerical simulations and in vivo validation from healthy knees. This proposed approach was used to assess the T2* for fast decay component ([Formula: see text]) and bound water signal fraction (fbw) of ACL graft in regions of interest drawn by a radiologist.

Results: Compared to the conventional bi-exponential model, the abbreviated UTE MRI paradigm achieved low relative estimation bias for [Formula: see text] and fbw over a range of clinically relevant values for ACL grafts. A decrease in [Formula: see text] of the intra-articular graft was observed in 7 of the 8 ACL reconstruction patients from 3- to 6-months (- 0.11 ± 0.16 ms, P = 0.10). Increases in [Formula: see text] and fbw from 3- to 6-months were observed in the tibial intra-bone graft ([Formula: see text]: 0.19 ± 0.18 ms, P < 0.05; Δfbw: 4% ± 4%, P < 0.05). Lower [Formula: see text] (- 0.09 ± 0.11 ms, P < 0.05) was observed at 3-months when comparing the intra-bone graft to the graft/bone interface in the femoral tunnel. The same comparisons at the 6-months also yielded relatively lower [Formula: see text] (- 0.09 ± 0.12 ms, P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The proposed abbreviated 3D UTE MRI paradigm is capable of assessing the ACL graft remodeling process in a clinically translatable acquisition time. Longitudinal changes in [Formula: see text] and fbw of the ACL graft were observed.

Keywords: ACL reconstruction; Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL); Graft healing; Ligamentization; Tendon-to-bone healing; Ultrashort TE (UTE).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. James M. Paci is an educational consultant for and receives research support from Arthrex and Zimmer-Biomet.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
T2s and fbw estimation bias over a range of values clinically relevant for ACL grafts. The proposed baseline-corrected mono-exponential model for short T2* component evaluation was used for estimation of T2s (c) and fbw (d). The bias compares the estimated values of T2s,app (a) and fbw, app (b) to the simulated values of T2s and fbw. All simulations assumed a T2l value of 20 ms
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
T2s and fbw estimation bias over a large range of fbw values. The proposed baseline-corrected mono-exponential model for short T2* component evaluation was used for estimation of T2s (c) and fbw (d). The bias compares the estimated values of T2s,app (a) and fbw, app (b) to the simulated values of T2s and fbw. All simulations assumed a T2l value of 20 ms
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
UTE images and signal fitting at TE of 0.1 ms (a) and 4 ms (b), corresponding signal decay with bi-exponential model fitting (blue lines) and baseline-corrected mono-exponential model fitting (red lines) for the ACL (c) and patellar tendon (d) for a healthy subject
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
UTE images at the 6 imaged TEs (a) and the corresponding signal decay profile with baseline-corrected mono-exponential fitting from the intra-articular graft region (b) for a representative ACL reconstruction subject. Note that the TE2 images are scaled by a factor of 1.2 for display purposes
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Sagittal and axial UTE image with TE of 4 ms for a representative ACL reconstruction subject. The left column shows the images in the sagittal plane and the right column shows images from the axial planes denoted by the yellow lines in the sagittal plane images. The red lines delineate the ACL graft. The first row depicts the femoral intra-bone graft and graft/bone interface, the second row depicts the intra-articular graft, and the third row depicts the tibial intra-bone graft and graft/bone interface. The outlines of the ACL graft on the sagittal plane images have been shrunk by 2 voxels for illustration purposes. The ACL graft outlines on the axial plane images were not shrunk by 2 voxels. The ACL graft outlines on the axial plane images of the femoral and tibial graft tunnels are thicker than the ACL graft outlines on the axial plane image of the intra-articular graft because they include the graft/bone interface (outer 2 voxels)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Regions of interest for a typical ACL reconstruction subject overlaid on the UTE image with TE of 4 ms. ROIs are color coded as follows: orange, femoral graft/bone interface; red, femoral intra-bone graft; yellow, intra-articular graft; green, tibial intra-bone; blue, tibial graft/bone interface
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Ladder plots of the T2s, fbw, and angle relative to B0 from 8 ACL reconstruction subjects at 3- and 6-months post-ACL reconstruction surgery

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gianotti SM, Marshall SW, Hume PA, Bunt L. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury and other knee ligament injuries: a national population-based study. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12(6):622–627. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2008.07.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buller LT, Best MJ, Baraga MG, Kaplan LD. Trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States. Orthop J Sports Med. 2015;3(1):2325967114563664. doi: 10.1177/2325967114563664. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mather RC, 3rd, Koenig L, Kocher MS, Dall TM, Gallo P, Scott DJ, Bach BR, Jr, Spindler KP, Group MK Societal and economic impact of anterior cruciate ligament tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(19):1751–1759. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01705. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amiel D, Frank C, Harwood F, Fronek J, Akeson W. Tendons and ligaments: a morphological and biochemical comparison. J Orthop Res. 1984;1(3):257–265. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100010305. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amiel D, Kleiner JB, Roux RD, Harwood FL, Akeson WH. The phenomenon of “ligamentization”: anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon. J Orthop Res. 1986;4(2):162–172. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100040204. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms