A Direct and Simple Method to Assess Drosophila melanogaster's Viability from Embryo to Adult
- PMID: 31524863
- DOI: 10.3791/59996
A Direct and Simple Method to Assess Drosophila melanogaster's Viability from Embryo to Adult
Abstract
In Drosophila melanogaster, viability assays are used to determine the fitness of certain genetic backgrounds. Allelic variations can result in partial or complete loss of viability at different stages of development. Our lab has developed a method to assess viability in Drosophila from embryo to fully mature adult. The method relies on quantifying the number of progeny present at different stages during development, starting with hatched embryos. After embryos have been quantified, additional stages are counted, including L1/L2, pupae, and mature adults. After all stages have been examined, a statistical analysis such as the chi-square test is used to determine if there is a significant difference between the starting number of progeny (hatched embryos) and later stages culminating in the observed number of adults, thus rejecting or accepting the null hypothesis (that the number of hatched embryos will be equal to the number of larvae, pupae, and adults recorded throughout the stages of development). The primary advantage of this assay is its simplicity and accuracy, as it does not require an embryo rinse to transfer them to the food vial, avoiding losses from technical errors. Although the protocol described here does not directly examine L2/L3 larvae, additional steps can be added to account for these. Comparing the number of hatched embryos, L1, pupae, and adults can help determine if viability was compromised during the L2/L3 stages for further studies (the use of colored food helps with visual identification of larvae). Overall, this method can help Drosophila researchers and educators determine when viability is compromised during the fly life cycle. Routine assessment of stocks using this assay can prevent accumulation of secondary mutations that may affect the phenotype of the originally isolated mutant, especially if the original mutations affect fitness. For this reason, our lab maintains multiple copies of each of our Dm ime4 alleles and routinely checks the purity of each stock with this method in addition to other molecular analyses.
Similar articles
-
A guide to study Drosophila muscle biology.Methods. 2014 Jun 15;68(1):2-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.02.037. Epub 2014 Mar 12. Methods. 2014. PMID: 24625467 Review.
-
Cryobiological preservation of Drosophila embryos.Science. 1992 Dec 18;258(5090):1932-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1470915. Science. 1992. PMID: 1470915
-
The Drosophila melanogaster stranded at second (sas) gene encodes a putative epidermal cell surface receptor required for larval development.Dev Biol. 1992 Jun;151(2):431-45. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(92)90183-h. Dev Biol. 1992. PMID: 1339334
-
The development of fused- embryos of Drosophila melanogaster.J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1985 Jun;87:99-114. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1985. PMID: 3928800
-
FLPing Genes On and Off in Drosophila.Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1642:195-209. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7169-5_13. Methods Mol Biol. 2017. PMID: 28815502 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The m6A Dynamics of Profilin in Neurogenesis.Front Genet. 2019 Nov 12;10:987. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00987. eCollection 2019. Front Genet. 2019. PMID: 31798620 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Using Drosophila to uncover molecular and physiological functions of circRNAs.Methods. 2021 Dec;196:74-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.04.016. Epub 2021 Apr 24. Methods. 2021. PMID: 33901645 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The proximal enhancer of the snail gene mediates negative autoregulatory feedback in Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics. 2025 Jun 4;230(2):iyaf058. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyaf058. Genetics. 2025. PMID: 40147870 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Miscellaneous