Rhyme Production Strategies Distinguish Stuttering Recovery and Persistence
- PMID: 31525133
- PMCID: PMC6808341
- DOI: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-18-0294
Rhyme Production Strategies Distinguish Stuttering Recovery and Persistence
Abstract
Purpose The primary aim of the current study was to examine the developing phonological awareness of 4- to 5-year-old children who stutter (CWS) in relation to eventual recovery (CWS-eRec) or persistance (CWS-ePer) in stuttering, accounting for the presence of typical speech (TS) production or speech sound disorder (SSD). Method In the 1st year of a 5-year longitudinal study, 37 children who do not stutter (CWNS) and 48 CWS completed a rhyme discrimination and a rhyme production task from the Phonological Awareness Test-Second Edition (Robertson & Salter, 2007). Using data from their last year of participation, CWS were classified into CWS-ePer and CWS-eRec. Each CWS group was further divided into TS and SSD groups based on speech production abilities at the time of the rhyme tasks. Accuracy on the rhyme tasks was compared. Groups were also compared on strategies used to generate correct and incorrect responses for the rhyme production task (e.g., real-word correct, nonword correct, semantic association, repeated cues). Results All groups performed similarly on the rhyme discrimination task. On the rhyme production task, CWS-ePer-SSD and CWS-eRec-SSD performed with less accuracy than CWNS, but CWS-ePer-TS, CWS-eRec-TS, and CWNS achieved similar task accuracy. On correct rhyme production trials, CWS-ePer-TS created more nonword rhymes than real-word rhymes. CWS-ePer-TS used the nonword strategy at 1.88 times the CWNS rate. CWS-eRec-TS fell between CWS-ePer-TS and CWNS in use of the nonword strategy. Conclusions Reliance on a nonword strategy for rhyme production in CWS-ePer-TS may reflect differences in underlying phonological representations and ease of phonological access to the lexicon compared to CWNS.
Figures





References
-
- Ambrose N. G., & Yairi E. (1999). Normative disfluency data for early childhood stuttering. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(4), 895–909. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4204.895 - PubMed
-
- American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1993). Definitions of communication disorders and variations [Relevant paper]. Retrieved from https://www.asha.org/policy - PubMed
-
- Anthony J. L., Aghara R. G., Dunkelberger M. J., Anthony T. I., Williams J. M., & Zhang Z. (2011). What factors place children with speech sound disorders at risk for reading problems? American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20(2), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2011/10-0053) - PubMed
-
- Anthony J. L., & Francis D. J. (2005). Development of phonological awareness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00376.x
-
- Anthony J. L., Lonigan C. J., Burgess S. R., Driscoll K., Phillips B. M., & Cantor B. G. (2002). Structure of preschool phonological sensitivity: Overlapping sensitivity to rhyme, words, syllables, and phonemes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82(1), 65–92. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.2002.2677 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous