Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jan;40(1):28-37.
doi: 10.1002/pd.5562. Epub 2019 Dec 3.

Latest developments in post-mortem foetal imaging

Affiliations
Review

Latest developments in post-mortem foetal imaging

Susan C Shelmerdine et al. Prenat Diagn. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

A sustained decline in parental consent rates for perinatal autopsies has driven the development of less-invasive methods for death investigation. A wide variety of imaging modalities have been developed for this purpose and include post-mortem whole body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) and micro-focus CT techniques. These are also vital for "minimally invasive" methods, which include potential for tissue sampling, such as image guidance for targeted biopsies and laparoscopic-assisted techniques. In this article, we address the range of imaging techniques currently in clinical practice and those under development. Significant advances in high-field MRI and micro-focus CT imaging show particular promise for smaller and earlier gestation foetuses. We also review how MRI biomarkers such as diffusion-weighted imaging and organ volumetric analysis may aid diagnosis and image interpretation in the absence of autopsy data. Three-dimensional printing and augmented reality may help make imaging findings more accessible to parents, colleagues and trainees.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Ernst LM. A pathologists perspective on the perinatal autopsy. Semin Perinatol. 2015;39(1):55-63.
    1. Lewis C, Hill M, Arthurs OJ, et al. Factors affecting uptake of postmortem examination in the prenatal, perinatal and paediatric setting. BJOG. 2018;125(2):172-181.
    1. Kang X, Cos T, Guizani M, et al. Parental acceptance of minimally invasive fetal and neonatal autopsy compared with conventional autopsy. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(11):1106-1110.
    1. Ben-Sasi K, Chitty LS, Franck LS, et al. Acceptability of a minimally invasive perinatal/paediatric autopsy: healthcare professionals' views and implications for practice. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33(4):307-312.
    1. McPherson E, Nestoridi E, Heinke D, et al. Alternatives to autopsy for fetal and early neonatal (perinatal) deaths: insights from the Wisconsin Stillbirth Service Program. Birth Defects Res. 2017;109(18):1430-1441.

LinkOut - more resources