A Critical Analysis of Joseph Fins' Mosaic Decisionmaking: A Response to "Mosaic Decisionmaking and Reemergent Agency after Severe Brain Injury" (CQ 27 (1))
- PMID: 31526420
- DOI: 10.1017/S0963180119000665
A Critical Analysis of Joseph Fins' Mosaic Decisionmaking: A Response to "Mosaic Decisionmaking and Reemergent Agency after Severe Brain Injury" (CQ 27 (1))
Abstract
In this paper, the author argues that Joseph Fins' mosaic decisionmaking model for brain-injured patients is untenable. He supports this claim by identifying three problems with mosaic decisionmaking. First, that it is unclear whether a mosaic is a conceptually adequate metaphor for a decisionmaking process that is intended to promote patient autonomy. Second, that the proposed legal framework for mosaic decisionmaking is inappropriate. Third, that it is unclear how we ought to select patients for participation in mosaic decisionmaking.
Keywords: brain injury; brain-injured patients; mosaic decisionmaking; patient autonomy.
Comment in
-
Mosaic Decisionmaking and Severe Brain Injury: Adding Another Piece to the Argument.Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2019 Oct;28(4):737-743. doi: 10.1017/S0963180119000677. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2019. PMID: 31423964 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Mosaic Decisionmaking and Reemergent Agency after Severe Brain Injury.Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2018 Jan;27(1):163-174. doi: 10.1017/S0963180117000329. Epub 2017 Sep 18. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2018. PMID: 28918755
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
