Unreamed Intra-Medullary Nail Versus Half Pin External Fixator in Grade III [A & B] Open tibia fractures
- PMID: 31528072
- PMCID: PMC6739465
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.10.016
Unreamed Intra-Medullary Nail Versus Half Pin External Fixator in Grade III [A & B] Open tibia fractures
Erratum in
-
Erratum regarding missing declaration of competing interest statements in previously published articles.J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Nov-Dec;11(6):1176. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.10.024. Epub 2020 Oct 15. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020. PMID: 33192027 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Background: Tibia fracture is the most common long bone fracture. The fractures of tibia are commonly open fractures due to subcutaneous position of the tibia. The choice of technique for stabilization of open tibia fractures includes - External fixation, unreamed intra-medullary nails [URTN], Reamed intra-medullary nails, ORIF with Plating.
Objectives: To evaluate & compare the results of Unreamed Intra-Medullary Nail Versus Half Pin External Fixator in Grade III [A & B] Open tibia fractures.
Methods: This prospective clinical study [Randomized chit box] was done on 50 patients presenting to our institute within 24 h of injury. Only those who were skeletally mature with open tibia fracture Grade IIIA & IIIB [Gustilo-Anderson] were included in this study. After initial management, radiological assessment was done. Following this adequate wound debridement, skeletal stabilization with either primary URTN or external fixator was done. Inspection and debridement were repeated at 48-h intervals until the wound was considered clean.
Results: 50 cases [25 each group] were compared in terms of - Final Alignment of the Fracture, Presence of Infection/Non-union/Mal-union, Hardware failure, Time to Bone Union, Number of Operative Procedures after index admission. Mean time to full weight bearing was 20.96 weeks in URTN group versus 24.8 weeks in Ex-fix group. 5 in URTN group required further surgery for non-union versus 11 patients in Ex-fix group. There were 6 significant pin track infection. Removal of nail was required in 1 case of deep infection.
Conclusion: This study supports the use of the URTN over External fixator in the treatment of severe open tibia fractures.
Keywords: External fixator; Intra-Medullary Nail; Soft tissue management; Tibia fractures; Unreamed.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Unreamed intramedullary nail versus external fixation in grade III open tibial fractures.J Trauma. 2002 Apr;52(4):650-4. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200204000-00006. J Trauma. 2002. PMID: 11956377
-
Treatment of type II, IIIA, and IIIB open fractures of the tibial shaft: a prospective comparison of unreamed interlocking intramedullary nails and half-pin external fixators.J Orthop Trauma. 1998 Jan;12(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199801000-00001. J Orthop Trauma. 1998. PMID: 9447512 Clinical Trial.
-
[Advantages of the unreamed tibial nail in comparison with external fixator in treatment of grade 3 B open tibial shaft fractures].Unfallchirurg. 1997 Apr;100(4):286-93. doi: 10.1007/s001130050121. Unfallchirurg. 1997. PMID: 9229779 German.
-
The use of gentamicin-coated nails in complex open tibia fracture and revision cases: A retrospective analysis of a single centre case series and review of the literature.Injury. 2015 Dec;46(12):2433-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.09.028. Epub 2015 Oct 8. Injury. 2015. PMID: 26477343 Review.
-
Open Pilon Fracture Postoperative Outcomes with Definitive Surgical Management Options: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2021 May;9(3):272-282. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2020.53240.2641. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2021. PMID: 34239954 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Unilateral External Fixator Combined with Lateral Auxiliary Frame for Ultimate Treatment of Tibia and Fibula Shaft Fractures with Poor Soft Tissue Conditions.Biomed Res Int. 2022 Aug 5;2022:9990744. doi: 10.1155/2022/9990744. eCollection 2022. Biomed Res Int. 2022. PMID: 36033556 Free PMC article.
-
External fixation versus intramedullary nailing for the management of open tibial fracture: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Int Orthop. 2023 Dec;47(12):3077-3097. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05879-7. Epub 2023 Jul 26. Int Orthop. 2023. PMID: 37491610
-
Application of unilateral external fixation by the "joystick technique" in the treatment of pediatric tibia shaft fractures: technical note.J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Aug 12;16(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02625-w. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021. PMID: 34384451 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing external fixators and intramedullary nailing for treating open tibia fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jan 5;18(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03490-x. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023. PMID: 36604668 Free PMC article.
-
Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing External Fixation to Intramedullary Nailing in the Treatment of Open Tibial Fractures.Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jul 14;59(7):1301. doi: 10.3390/medicina59071301. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023. PMID: 37512111 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Chapman M.W. The role of intramedullary fixation in open fractures. Clin Orthop. 1986;212:26–34. - PubMed
-
- Dellinger E.P., Caplan E.S., Weaver L.D. Duration of preventative antibiotic administration for open extremity fractures. Arch Surg. 1988;123:333–339. - PubMed
-
- Dellinger E.P., Miller S.D., Wertz M.J., Grypma M., Droppert B., Anderson P.A. Risk of infection after open fracture of the arm or leg. Arch Surg. 1988;123:1320–1327. - PubMed
-
- Gustilo R.B., Anderson J.T. Prevention of infection in the treatment of 1025 open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(4):453–458. - PubMed
-
- Gustilo R.B., Gruninger R.P., Davis T. Classification of type III (severe) open fractures relative to treatment and results. Orthopaedics. 1987;10:1781–1788. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials