Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;14(3):225-233.
doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 20.

Fak silencing impairs osteogenic differentiation of bone mesenchymal stem cells induced by uniaxial mechanical stretch

Affiliations

Fak silencing impairs osteogenic differentiation of bone mesenchymal stem cells induced by uniaxial mechanical stretch

Pei Hu et al. J Dent Sci. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Background/purpose: Mechanical stretch plays a key role in promoting proliferation and differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) in distraction osteogenesis (DO). A better understanding of how the extracellular biomechanical stimulation is transferred to intracellular signal expression will benefit DO. Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is a key factor in integrin signaling pathway. However, little is known about the effect of integrin-FAK signaling during the process of stretch induced osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs.

Materials and methods: A specific short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) lentiviral expression vector was used to silence Fak gene and a well-established in vitro uniaxial dynamic stretching device was applied to stimulate DO. Fak silencing was confirmed by fluorescence microscopy and the detection of Fak mRNA and FAK, p-FAK protein expression. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, expression of osteogenic differentiation markers - runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2/Runx2) and alkaline phosphatase (Alp) together with integrin upstream signal transduction molecules integrin beta-1 (ITGB1/Itgb1) and downstream signal transduction molecules integrin-linked kinase (ILK) were detected after the stretch.

Results: The results showed that mechanical stretch in control groups significantly induced the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs with increased ALP activity, expression of RUNX2/Runx2 and Alp, together with upregulated ITGB1/Itgb1 and ILK, which all vanished in Fak silencing group.

Conclusion: Silencing of the Fak gene inhibited the osteogenic differentiation of rat BMSCs induced by in vitro mechanical stretch through integrin signaling pathway.

Keywords: Distraction osteogenesis; Focal adhesion kinase; Integrin signaling pathway; Mechanical stretch; Mesenchymal stem cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Uniaxial dynamic stretching device. A. Control system; B. Stretching units; and C. Bone during distraction osteogenesis in vivo; D. Cells during biomechanical stretch in stretching unit; E. Primary rat bone mesenchymal stem cells. Scale bars, 100 μm; F. Cells after mechanical stretch. Scale bars, 100 μm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Antigens expression on cell surface. Positive for CD29 and CD90, negative for CD34 and CD45.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Representative fluorescence images showing GFP expression in BMSCs of the three groups after transfection: A. Control group; B. shRNA-Neg group and C. shRNA-Fak group. Scale bar, 100 μm.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A. Representative images of Western blots showing FAK, p-FAK and GAPDH protein expression in control group of BMSCs after exposed to mechanical stretch simulating distraction. B. Fak mRNA expression in three groups of BMSCs. C. FAK and p-FAK protein expression in three groups of BMSCs (*p < 0.05).
Figure 5
Figure 5
mRNA expression level of Itgb1, Alp, and Runx2 in three groups of BMSCs after exposed to mechanical stretch simulating distraction (*p < 0.05).
Figure 6
Figure 6
A. Representative images and B. Quantitative analysis of Western blots showing ITGB1, ILK, RUNX2, and GAPDH protein expression in three groups of BMSCs after exposed to mechanical stretch simulating distraction (*p < 0.05).

References

    1. McCarthy J.G., Stelnicki E.J., Mehrara B.J. Distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial skeleton. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:1812–1827. - PubMed
    1. Li G., Simpson A.H., Kenwright J. Assessment of cell proliferation in regenerating bone during distraction osteogenesis at different distraction rates. J Orthop Res. 1997;15:765–772. - PubMed
    1. Aronson J., Shen X.C., Gao G.G. Sustained proliferation accompanies distraction osteogenesis in the rat. J Orthop Res. 1997;15:563–569. - PubMed
    1. Qi M.C., Hu J., Zou S.J. Mechanical strain induces osteogenic differentiation: Cbfa1 and Ets-1 expression in stretched rat mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37:453–458. - PubMed
    1. Feng X., Tuo X., Chen F. Ultrastructural cell response to tension stress during mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;46:527–532. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources