Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jun 7;2019(1):139-146.
doi: 10.1093/emph/eoz017. eCollection 2019.

Differences in mutational processes and intra-tumour heterogeneity between organs: The local selective filter hypothesis

Affiliations
Review

Differences in mutational processes and intra-tumour heterogeneity between organs: The local selective filter hypothesis

Mathieu Giraudeau et al. Evol Med Public Health. .

Abstract

Extensive diversity (genetic, cytogenetic, epigenetic and phenotypic) exists within and between tumours, but reasons behind these variations, as well as their consistent hierarchical pattern between organs, are poorly understood at the moment. We argue that these phenomena are, at least partially, explainable by the evolutionary ecology of organs' theory, in the same way that environmental adversity shapes mutation rates and level of polymorphism in organisms. Organs in organisms can be considered as specialized ecosystems that are, for ecological and evolutionary reasons, more or less efficient at suppressing tumours. When a malignancy does arise in an organ applying strong selection pressure on tumours, its constituent cells are expected to display a large range of possible surviving strategies, from hyper mutator phenotypes relying on bet-hedging to persist (high mutation rates and high diversity), to few poorly variable variants that become invisible to natural defences. In contrast, when tumour suppression is weaker, selective pressure favouring extreme surviving strategies is relaxed, and tumours are moderately variable as a result. We provide a comprehensive overview of this hypothesis. Lay summary: Different levels of mutations and intra-tumour heterogeneity have been observed between cancer types and organs. Anti-cancer defences are unequal between our organs. We propose that mostly aggressive neoplasms (i.e. higher mutational and ITH levels), succeed in emerging and developing in organs with strong defences.

Keywords: cancer; intra-tumoural heterogeneity; mutation; selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fidler IJ. Tumor heterogeneity and the biology of cancer invasion and metastasis. Cancer Res 1978;38:2651–60. - PubMed
    1. Marusyk A, Polyak K.. Tumor heterogeneity: causes and consequences. Biochim Biophys Acta 2010;1805:105–17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marusyk A, Almendro V, Polyak K.. Intra-tumour heterogeneity: a looking glass for cancer? Nat Rev Cancer 2012;12:323–34. - PubMed
    1. Yates LR, Campbell PJ.. Evolution of the cancer genome. Nat Rev Genet 2012;13:795–806. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greaves M, Maley CC.. Clonal evolution in cancer. Nature 2012. DOI: 10.1038/nature10762 - PMC - PubMed