Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2019 Dec 1;26(12):1458-1465.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz136.

What health records data are required for accurate prediction of suicidal behavior?

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

What health records data are required for accurate prediction of suicidal behavior?

Gregory E Simon et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Objective: The study sought to evaluate how availability of different types of health records data affect the accuracy of machine learning models predicting suicidal behavior.

Materials and methods: Records from 7 large health systems identified 19 061 056 outpatient visits to mental health specialty or general medical providers between 2009 and 2015. Machine learning models (logistic regression with penalized LASSO [least absolute shrinkage and selection operator] variable selection) were developed to predict suicide death (n = 1240) or probable suicide attempt (n = 24 133) in the following 90 days. Base models were used only historical insurance claims data and were then augmented with data regarding sociodemographic characteristics (race, ethnicity, and neighborhood characteristics), past patient-reported outcome questionnaires from electronic health records, and data (diagnoses and questionnaires) recorded during the visit.

Results: For prediction of any attempt following mental health specialty visits, a model limited to historical insurance claims data performed approximately as well (C-statistic 0.843) as a model using all available data (C-statistic 0.850). For prediction of suicide attempt following a general medical visit, addition of data recorded during the visit yielded a meaningful improvement over a model using all data up to the prior day (C-statistic 0.853 vs 0.838).

Discussion: Results may not generalize to setting with less comprehensive data or different patterns of care. Even the poorest-performing models were superior to brief self-report questionnaires or traditional clinical assessment.

Conclusions: Implementation of suicide risk prediction models in mental health specialty settings may be less technically demanding than expected. In general medical settings, however, delivery of optimal risk predictions at the point of care may require more sophisticated informatics capability.

Keywords: electronic health records; insurance claims; machine learning; patient-reported outcomes; risk prediction; suicide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Receiver-operating characteristic curves illustrating model performance in validation dataset for prediction of suicide attempts and suicide deaths within 90 days of visit in 7 health systems. MH: mental health; PC: primary care; PRO: patient-reported outcome; SES: socioeconomic status.

References

    1. Murphy SL, Xu JQ, Kochanek KD, Arias E.. Mortality in the United States, 2017. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2017.
    1. WISQARS Nonfatal Injury Reports, 2000–2014. 2017. https://webappa.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/nfirates.html Accessed April 4, 2017.
    1. Ahmedani BK, Simon GE, Stewart C, et al. Health care contacts in the year before suicide death. J Gen Intern Med 2014; 296: 870–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmedani BK, Stewart C, Simon GE, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in health care visits made before suicide attempt across the United States. Med Care 2015; 535: 430–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patient Safety Advisory Group. Detecting and treating suicidal ideation in all settings. Sentinel Event Alerts 2016; 56:1–7. - PubMed

Publication types