Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 17;9(9):CD003248.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003248.pub4.

Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental transfusion at preterm birth on maternal and infant outcomes

Affiliations

Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental transfusion at preterm birth on maternal and infant outcomes

Heike Rabe et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Infants born preterm (before 37 weeks' gestation) have poorer outcomes than infants at term, particularly if born before 32 weeks. Early cord clamping has been standard practice over many years, and enables quick transfer of the infant to neonatal care. Delayed clamping allows blood flow between the placenta, umbilical cord and baby to continue, and may aid transition. Keeping baby at the mother's side enables neonatal care with the cord intact and this, along with delayed clamping, may improve outcomes. Umbilical cord milking (UCM) is proposed for increasing placental transfusion when immediate care for the preterm baby is needed. This Cochrane Review is a further update of a review first published in 2004 and updated in 2012.

Objectives: To assess the effects on infants born at less than 37 weeks' gestation, and their mothers of: 1) delayed cord clamping (DCC) compared with early cord clamping (ECC) both with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping; 2) DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact compared with ECC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping; 3) DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping compared with UCM; 4) UCM compared with ECC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (10 November 2017), and reference lists of retrieved studies. We updated the search in November 2018 and added nine new trial reports to the awaiting classification section to be assessed at the next update.

Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing delayed with early clamping of the umbilical cord (with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping or with cord intact) and UCM for births before 37 weeks' gestation. Quasi-RCTs were excluded.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. Random-effects are used in all meta-analyses. Review authors assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

Main results: This update includes forty-eight studies, involving 5721 babies and their mothers, with data available from 40 studies involving 4884 babies and their mothers. Babies were between 24 and 36+6 weeks' gestation at birth and multiple births were included. The data are mostly from high-income countries. Delayed clamping ranged between 30 to 180 seconds, with most studies delaying for 30 to 60 seconds. Early clamping was less than 30 seconds and often immediate. UCM was mostly before cord clamping but some were milked after cord clamping. We undertook subgroup analysis by gestation and type of intervention, and sensitivity analyses by low risk of selection and attrition bias.All studies were high risk for performance bias and many were unclear for other aspects of risk of bias. Certainty of the evidence using GRADE was mostly low, mainly due to imprecision and unclear risk of bias.Delayed cord clamping (DCC) versus early cord clamping (ECC) both with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping (25 studies, 3100 babies and their mothers)DCC probably reduces the number of babies who die before discharge compared with ECC (average risk ratio (aRR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54 to 0.98, 20 studies, 2680 babies (moderate certainty)).No studies reported on 'Death or neurodevelopmental impairment' in the early years'.DCC may make little or no difference to the number of babies with severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH grades 3 and 4) (aRR 0.94, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.39, 10 studies, 2058 babies, low certainty) but slightly reduces the number of babies with any grade IVH (aRR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.99, 15 studies, 2333 babies, high certainty).DCC has little or no effect on chronic lung disease (CLD) (aRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.14, 6 studies, 1644 babies, high certainty).Due to insufficient data, we were unable to form conclusions regarding periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) (aRR 0.58, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.30, 4 studies, 1544 babies, low certainty) or maternal blood loss of 500 mL or greater (aRR 1.14, 95% CI 0.07 to 17.63, 2 studies, 180 women, very low certainty).We identified no important heterogeneity in subgroup or sensitivity analyses.Delayed cord clamping (DCC) with immediate neonatal care with cord intact versus early cord clamping (ECC) (one study, 276 babies and their mothers)There are insufficient data to be confident in our findings, but DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact may reduce the number of babies who die before discharge, although the data are also compatible with a slight increase in mortality, compared with ECC (aRR 0.47, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.11, 1 study, 270 babies, low certainty). DCC may also reduce the number of babies who die or have neurodevelopmental impairment in early years (aRR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.96, 1 study, 218 babies, low certainty). There may be little or no difference in: severe IVH; all grades IVH; PVL; CLD; maternal blood loss ≥ 500 mL, assessed as low certainty mainly due to serious imprecision.Delayed cord clamping (DCC) with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping versus umbilical cord milking (UCM) (three studies, 322 babies and their mothers) and UCM versus early cord clamping (ECC) (11 studies, 1183 babies and their mothers)There are insufficient data for reliable conclusions about the comparative effects of UCM compared with delayed or early clamping (mostly low or very low certainty).

Authors' conclusions: Delayed, rather than early, cord clamping may reduce the risk of death before discharge for babies born preterm. There is insufficient evidence to show what duration of delay is best, one or several minutes, and therefore the optimum time to clamp the umbilical cord remains unclear. Whilst the current evidence supports not clamping the cord before 30 seconds at preterm births, future trials could compare different lengths of delay. Immediate neonatal care with the cord intact requires further study, and there are insufficient data on UCM.The nine new reports awaiting further classification may alter the conclusions of the review once assessed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Heike Rabe is main author for two included studies in this review (Rabe 2000; Rabe 2011). Studies by the contact author, which may be relevant for inclusion in this review, were not assessed by herself but by the co‐authors who, in agreement with the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth group, have named other experts in the field for this purpose.

Jose Diaz‐Rossello ‐ none known.

Lelia Duley has been awarded an NIHR research grant for a programme of work which includes a pilot trial of timing of cord clamping for preterm births (CORD Pilot 2018), and a prospective meta‐analysis.

Gillian Gyte was a co‐applicant on one of the included studies in this review (CORD Pilot 2018). She also has received royalties from John Wiley & Son in respect of ‘A Cochrane Pocket Handbook – Pregnancy and Childbirth' Hofmeyr GJ et al. 2008.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
2
2
'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
3
3
'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
4
4
Funnel plot of comparison: 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), outcome: 1.1 Death of baby (up to discharge).
5
5
Funnel plot of comparison: 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), outcome: 1.3 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH grades 3, 4).
6
6
Funnel plot of comparison: 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), outcome: 1.4 Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH, all grades).
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 1 Death of baby (up to discharge).
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 3 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH grades 3, 4).
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 4 Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH, all grades).
1.5
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 5 Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL).
1.6
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 6 Chronic lung disease (CLD) ‐ oxygen supplement at 36 weeks (corrected for gestation).
1.7
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 7 Maternal blood loss of 500 mL or greater.
1.8
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 8 Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH, grades 1 & 2).
1.9
1.9. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 9 Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) confirmed by X‐ray or laparotomy).
1.10
1.10. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 10 Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS).
1.11
1.11. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 11 Respiratory support (ventilator or CPAP).
1.12
1.12. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 12 Duration of respiratory support (in days).
1.13
1.13. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 13 Surfactant treatment (for severe RDS).
1.14
1.14. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 14 Treatment for Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA) (medical and/or surgical).
1.15
1.15. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 15 Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity (RoP).
1.16
1.16. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 16 Hyperbilirubinemia (treated by phototherapy).
1.17
1.17. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 17 Inotropics for low blood pressure.
1.18
1.18. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 18 Low Apgar as defined by trialists (generally < 8 at 5 mins).
1.19
1.19. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 19 Blood transfusion in infant.
1.20
1.20. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 20 Volume of blood transfused (mL).
1.21
1.21. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 21 Late sepsis (after 3 days or as defined by trialists).
1.23
1.23. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 23 Temperature < 36.0oC within 1 hour of birth.
1.24
1.24. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 24 Hb within 1st 24 hour of birth (g/dL).
1.25
1.25. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 25 Mean arterial blood pressure in early hours after birth (mm Hg).
1.27
1.27. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 27 Home oxygen.
1.33
1.33. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 33 Blood transfusion for mother.
1.39
1.39. Analysis
Comparison 1 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 39 Fully breastfed or mixed feeding at infant discharge.
2.1
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 1 Death of baby (up to discharge).
2.3
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 3 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH grades 3, 4).
2.4
2.4. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 4 Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH, all grades).
2.5
2.5. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 5 Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL).
2.6
2.6. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 6 Chronic lung disease (CLD) ‐ oxygen supplement at 36 weeks (corrected for gestation).
2.7
2.7. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 7 Maternal blood loss of 500 mL or greater.
2.8
2.8. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 8 Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH, grades 1 & 2).
2.9
2.9. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 9 Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) confirmed by X‐ray or laparotomy).
2.10
2.10. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 10 Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS).
2.11
2.11. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 11 Respiratory support (ventilator or CPAP).
2.12
2.12. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 12 Duration of respiratory support.
2.13
2.13. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 13 Surfactant treatment (for severe RDS).
2.14
2.14. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 14 Treatment for Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA) (medical and/or surgical).
2.15
2.15. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 15 Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity (RoP).
2.16
2.16. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 16 Hyperbilirubinemia (treated by phototherapy).
2.17
2.17. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 17 Inotropics for low blood pressure.
2.18
2.18. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 18 Low Apgar as defined by trialists (generally < 8 at 5 mins).
2.19
2.19. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 19 Blood transfusion in infant.
2.20
2.20. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 20 Volume of blood transfused (mL).
2.21
2.21. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 21 Late sepsis (after 3 days or as defined by trialists).
2.23
2.23. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 23 Temperature < 36.0oC within 1 hour of birth.
2.24
2.24. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 24 Hb within 1st 24 hour of birth (g/dL).
2.25
2.25. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 25 Mean arterial blood pressure in early hours after birth (mm Hg).
2.27
2.27. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 27 Home oxygen.
2.33
2.33. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 33 Blood transfusion for mother.
2.39
2.39. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 39 Fully breastfed or mixed feeding at infant discharge.
2.42
2.42. Analysis
Comparison 2 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 42 Neurosensory disability at 7 months (Bailey's MDI < 70) ‐ not prespecified.
3.1
3.1. Analysis
Comparison 3 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 1 Death of baby (up to discharge).
3.2
3.2. Analysis
Comparison 3 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 2 Death or neurodevelopmental impairment at age two to three years.
3.3
3.3. Analysis
Comparison 3 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 3 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH grades 3, 4).
3.4
3.4. Analysis
Comparison 3 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 4 Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH, all grades).
3.5
3.5. Analysis
Comparison 3 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 5 Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL).
3.6
3.6. Analysis
Comparison 3 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 6 Chronic lung disease (CLD) ‐ oxygen supplement at 36 weeks (corrected for gestation).
3.7
3.7. Analysis
Comparison 3 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 7 Maternal blood loss of 500 mL or greater.
3.8
3.8. Analysis
Comparison 3 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 8 Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH, grades 1 & 2).
3.9
3.9. Analysis
Comparison 3 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 9 Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) confirmed by X‐ray or laparotomy).
3.11
3.11. Analysis
Comparison 3 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 11 Respiratory support (ventilator or CPAP).
3.14
3.14. Analysis
Comparison 3 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 14 Treatment for Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA) (medical and/or surgical).
3.15
3.15. Analysis
Comparison 3 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 15 Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity (RoP).
3.16
3.16. Analysis
Comparison 3 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 16 Hyperbilirubinemia (treated by phototherapy).
3.19
3.19. Analysis
Comparison 3 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 19 Blood transfusion in infant.
3.21
3.21. Analysis
Comparison 3 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 21 Late sepsis (after 3 days or as defined by trialists).
3.22
3.22. Analysis
Comparison 3 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 22 Hydrocephalus.
3.23
3.23. Analysis
Comparison 3 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 23 Temperature < 36.0oC within 1 hour of birth.
3.28
3.28. Analysis
Comparison 3 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 28 Neurodevelopmental impairment at age two to three years.
3.31
3.31. Analysis
Comparison 3 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 31 Manual removal of placenta (denominator = vaginal births).
3.32
3.32. Analysis
Comparison 3 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 32 Prolonged third stage (>30 minutes) (denominator = vaginal births).
3.33
3.33. Analysis
Comparison 3 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 33 Blood transfusion for mother.
3.34
3.34. Analysis
Comparison 3 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 34 Postpartum infection in mother.
3.39
3.39. Analysis
Comparison 3 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 39 Fully breastfed or mixed feeding at infant discharge.
4.1
4.1. Analysis
Comparison 4 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 1 Death of baby (up to discharge).
4.2
4.2. Analysis
Comparison 4 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 2 Death or neurodevelopmental impairment at age two to three years.
4.3
4.3. Analysis
Comparison 4 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 3 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH grades 3, 4).
4.4
4.4. Analysis
Comparison 4 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 4 Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH, all grades).
4.5
4.5. Analysis
Comparison 4 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 5 Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL).
4.6
4.6. Analysis
Comparison 4 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 6 Chronic lung disease (CLD) ‐ oxygen supplement at 36 weeks (corrected for gestation).
4.7
4.7. Analysis
Comparison 4 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 7 Maternal blood loss of 500 mL or greater.
4.8
4.8. Analysis
Comparison 4 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 8 Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH, grades 1 & 2).
4.9
4.9. Analysis
Comparison 4 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 9 Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) confirmed by X‐ray or laparotomy).
4.11
4.11. Analysis
Comparison 4 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 11 Respiratory support (ventilator or CPAP).
4.14
4.14. Analysis
Comparison 4 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 14 Treatment for Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA) (medical and/or surgical).
4.15
4.15. Analysis
Comparison 4 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 15 Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity (RoP).
4.16
4.16. Analysis
Comparison 4 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 16 Hyperbilirubinemia (treated by phototherapy).
4.19
4.19. Analysis
Comparison 4 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 19 Blood transfusion in infant.
4.21
4.21. Analysis
Comparison 4 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 21 Late sepsis (after 3 days or as defined by trialists).
4.22
4.22. Analysis
Comparison 4 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 22 Hydrocephalus.
4.23
4.23. Analysis
Comparison 4 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 23 Temperature < 36.0oC within 1 hour of birth.
4.28
4.28. Analysis
Comparison 4 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 28 Neurodevelopmental impairment at age two to three years.
4.31
4.31. Analysis
Comparison 4 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 31 Manual removal of placenta (denominator = vaginal births).
4.32
4.32. Analysis
Comparison 4 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 32 Prolonged third stage (>30 minutes) (denominator = vaginal births).
4.33
4.33. Analysis
Comparison 4 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 33 Blood transfusion for mother.
4.34
4.34. Analysis
Comparison 4 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 34 Postpartum infection in mother.
4.39
4.39. Analysis
Comparison 4 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 39 Fully breastfed or mixed feeding at infant discharge.
5.1
5.1. Analysis
Comparison 5 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 1 Death of baby (up to discharge).
5.2
5.2. Analysis
Comparison 5 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 2 Death or neurodevelopmental impairment at age two to three years.
5.3
5.3. Analysis
Comparison 5 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 3 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH grades 3, 4).
5.4
5.4. Analysis
Comparison 5 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 4 Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH, all grades).
5.5
5.5. Analysis
Comparison 5 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 5 Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL).
5.6
5.6. Analysis
Comparison 5 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 6 Chronic lung disease (CLD) ‐ oxygen supplement at 36 weeks (corrected for gestation).
5.8
5.8. Analysis
Comparison 5 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 8 Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH, grades 1 & 2).
5.9
5.9. Analysis
Comparison 5 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 9 Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) confirmed by X‐ray or laparotomy).
5.12
5.12. Analysis
Comparison 5 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 12 Duration of respiratory support (days).
5.13
5.13. Analysis
Comparison 5 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 13 Surfactant treatment (for severe RDS).
5.15
5.15. Analysis
Comparison 5 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 15 Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity (RoP).
5.19
5.19. Analysis
Comparison 5 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 19 Blood transfusion in infant.
5.21
5.21. Analysis
Comparison 5 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 21 Late sepsis (after 3 days or as defined by trialists).
5.22
5.22. Analysis
Comparison 5 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 22 Hydrocephalus.
5.24
5.24. Analysis
Comparison 5 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 24 Hb within 1st 24 hour of birth (g/dL).
5.27
5.27. Analysis
Comparison 5 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 27 Home oxygen.
5.28
5.28. Analysis
Comparison 5 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 28 Neurodevelopmental impairment at age two to three years.
5.29
5.29. Analysis
Comparison 5 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 29 Severe visual impairment.
5.30
5.30. Analysis
Comparison 5 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 30 Cerebral palsy (CP).
6.1
6.1. Analysis
Comparison 6 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 1 Death of baby (up to discharge).
6.2
6.2. Analysis
Comparison 6 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 2 Death or neurodevelopmental impairment at age two to three years.
6.3
6.3. Analysis
Comparison 6 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 3 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH grades 3, 4).
6.4
6.4. Analysis
Comparison 6 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 4 Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH, all grades).
6.5
6.5. Analysis
Comparison 6 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 5 Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL).
6.6
6.6. Analysis
Comparison 6 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 6 Chronic lung disease (CLD) ‐ oxygen supplement at 36 weeks (corrected for gestation).
6.8
6.8. Analysis
Comparison 6 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 8 Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH, grades 1 & 2).
6.12
6.12. Analysis
Comparison 6 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 12 Duration of respiratory support (days).
6.13
6.13. Analysis
Comparison 6 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 13 Surfactant treatment (for severe RDS).
6.15
6.15. Analysis
Comparison 6 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 15 Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity (RoP).
6.19
6.19. Analysis
Comparison 6 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 19 Blood transfusion in infant.
6.21
6.21. Analysis
Comparison 6 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 21 Late sepsis (after 3 days or as defined by trialists).
6.22
6.22. Analysis
Comparison 6 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 22 Hydrocephalus.
6.24
6.24. Analysis
Comparison 6 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 24 Hb within 1st 24 hour of birth (g/dL).
6.27
6.27. Analysis
Comparison 6 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 27 Home oxygen.
6.28
6.28. Analysis
Comparison 6 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 28 Neurodevelopmental impairment at age two to three years.
6.29
6.29. Analysis
Comparison 6 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 29 Severe visual impairment.
6.30
6.30. Analysis
Comparison 6 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 30 Cerebral palsy (CP).
7.1
7.1. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 1 Death of baby (up to discharge).
7.3
7.3. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 3 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH grades 3, 4).
7.4
7.4. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 4 Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH, all grades).
7.5
7.5. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 5 Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL).
7.6
7.6. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 6 Chronic lung disease (CLD) ‐ oxygen supplement at 36 weeks (corrected for gestation).
7.7
7.7. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 7 Maternal blood loss of 500 mL or greater.
7.8
7.8. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 8 Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH, grades 1 & 2).
7.9
7.9. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 9 Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) confirmed by X‐ray or laparotomy).
7.10
7.10. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 10 Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS).
7.11
7.11. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 11 Respiratory support (ventilator or CPAP).
7.12
7.12. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 12 Duration of respiratory support (days).
7.13
7.13. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 13 Surfactant treatment (for severe RDS).
7.14
7.14. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 14 Treatment for Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA) (medical and/or surgical).
7.15
7.15. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 15 Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity (RoP).
7.16
7.16. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 16 Hyperbilirubinemia (treated by phototherapy).
7.17
7.17. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 17 Inotropics for low blood pressure.
7.18
7.18. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 18 Low Apgar as defined by trialists (generally < 8 at 5 mins).
7.19
7.19. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 19 Blood transfusion in infant.
7.20
7.20. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 20 Volume of blood transfused (mL).
7.21
7.21. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 21 Late sepsis (after 3 days or as defined by trialists).
7.24
7.24. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 24 Hb within 1st 24 hour of birth (g/dL).
7.25
7.25. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 25 Mean arterial blood pressure.
7.26
7.26. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 26 Length of infant stay in NICU (in weeks).
7.27
7.27. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 27 Home oxygen.
7.28
7.28. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 28 Neurodevelopmental impairment at age two to three years.
7.29
7.29. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 29 Severe visual impairment.
7.30
7.30. Analysis
Comparison 7 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by gestation), Outcome 30 Cerebral palsy (CP).
8.1
8.1. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 1 Death of baby (up to discharge).
8.3
8.3. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 3 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH grades 3, 4).
8.4
8.4. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 4 Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH, all grades).
8.5
8.5. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 5 Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL).
8.6
8.6. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 6 Chronic lung disease (CLD) ‐ oxygen supplement at 36 weeks (corrected for gestation).
8.7
8.7. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 7 Maternal blood loss of 500 mL or greater.
8.8
8.8. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 8 Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH, grades 1 & 2).
8.9
8.9. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 9 Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) confirmed by X‐ray or laparotomy).
8.10
8.10. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 10 Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS).
8.11
8.11. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 11 Respiratory support (ventilator or CPAP).
8.12
8.12. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 12 Duration of respiratory support (days).
8.13
8.13. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 13 Surfactant treatment (for severe RDS).
8.14
8.14. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 14 Treatment for Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA) (medical and/or surgical).
8.15
8.15. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 15 Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity (RoP).
8.16
8.16. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 16 Hyperbilirubinemia (treated by phototherapy).
8.17
8.17. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 17 Inotropics for low blood pressure.
8.18
8.18. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 18 Low Apgar as defined by trialists (generally < 8 at 5 mins).
8.19
8.19. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 19 Blood transfusion in infant (mL).
8.20
8.20. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 20 Volume of blood transfused.
8.21
8.21. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 21 Late sepsis (after 3 days or as defined by trialists).
8.24
8.24. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 24 Hb within 1st 24 hour of birth (g/dL).
8.25
8.25. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 25 Mean arterial blood pressure (subgrouped by time after birth).
8.26
8.26. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 26 Length of infant stay in NICU.
8.27
8.27. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 27 Home oxygen.
8.28
8.28. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 28 Neurodevelopmental impairment at age two to three years.
8.29
8.29. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 29 Severe visual impairment.
8.30
8.30. Analysis
Comparison 8 UCM vs ECC (subgroup analysis by type of intervention), Outcome 30 Cerebral palsy (CP).
9.1
9.1. Analysis
Comparison 9 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (low risk of bias), Outcome 1 Death of baby (up to discharge).
9.3
9.3. Analysis
Comparison 9 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (low risk of bias), Outcome 3 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH grades 3, 4).
9.4
9.4. Analysis
Comparison 9 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (low risk of bias), Outcome 4 Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH, all grades).
9.5
9.5. Analysis
Comparison 9 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (low risk of bias), Outcome 5 Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL).
9.6
9.6. Analysis
Comparison 9 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (low risk of bias), Outcome 6 Chronic lung disease (CLD) ‐ oxygen supplement at 36 weeks (corrected for gestation).
9.7
9.7. Analysis
Comparison 9 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs ECC (low risk of bias), Outcome 7 Maternal blood loss of 500 mL or greater.
10.1
10.1. Analysis
Comparison 10 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (low risk of bias), Outcome 1 Death of baby (up to discharge).
10.2
10.2. Analysis
Comparison 10 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (low risk of bias), Outcome 2 Death or neurodevelopmental impairment in early years.
10.3
10.3. Analysis
Comparison 10 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (low risk of bias), Outcome 3 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH grades 3, 4).
10.4
10.4. Analysis
Comparison 10 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (low risk of bias), Outcome 4 Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH, all grades).
10.5
10.5. Analysis
Comparison 10 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (low risk of bias), Outcome 5 Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL).
10.6
10.6. Analysis
Comparison 10 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (low risk of bias), Outcome 6 Chronic lung disease (CLD) ‐ oxygen supplement at 36 weeks (corrected for gestation).
10.7
10.7. Analysis
Comparison 10 DCC with immediate neonatal care with cord intact vs ECC (low risk of bias), Outcome 7 Maternal blood loss of 500 mL or greater.
11.1
11.1. Analysis
Comparison 11 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (low risk of bias), Outcome 1 Death of baby (up to discharge).
11.2
11.2. Analysis
Comparison 11 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (low risk of bias), Outcome 2 Death or neurodevelopmental impairment in early years.
11.3
11.3. Analysis
Comparison 11 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (low risk of bias), Outcome 3 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH grades 3, 4).
11.4
11.4. Analysis
Comparison 11 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (low risk of bias), Outcome 4 Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH, all grades).
11.5
11.5. Analysis
Comparison 11 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (low risk of bias), Outcome 5 Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL).
11.6
11.6. Analysis
Comparison 11 DCC with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping vs UCM (low risk of bias), Outcome 6 Chronic lung disease (CLD) ‐ oxygen supplement at 36 weeks (corrected for gestation).
12.1
12.1. Analysis
Comparison 12 UCM vs ECC (low risk of bias), Outcome 1 Death of baby (up to discharge).
12.3
12.3. Analysis
Comparison 12 UCM vs ECC (low risk of bias), Outcome 3 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH grades 3, 4).
12.4
12.4. Analysis
Comparison 12 UCM vs ECC (low risk of bias), Outcome 4 Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH, all grades).
12.5
12.5. Analysis
Comparison 12 UCM vs ECC (low risk of bias), Outcome 5 Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL).
12.6
12.6. Analysis
Comparison 12 UCM vs ECC (low risk of bias), Outcome 6 Chronic lung disease (CLD) ‐ oxygen supplement at 36 weeks (corrected for gestation).
12.7
12.7. Analysis
Comparison 12 UCM vs ECC (low risk of bias), Outcome 7 Maternal blood loss of 500 mL or greater.

Update of

References

References to studies included in this review

Aladangady 2006 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Aladangady N, McHugh S, Aitchison TC, Wardrop CA, Holland BM. Infant's blood volume in a controlled trial of placental transfusion at preterm delivery. Pediatrics 2006;117:93‐8. - PubMed
Alan 2014 {published data only}
    1. Alan S, Arsan S, Okulu E, Akin I, Kilic A, Taskin S, et al. Effects of umbilical cord milking on the need for packed red blood cell transfusions and early neonatal haemodynamic adaptation in preterm infants born =1500 g. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2014; Vol. 99:A453‐4. - PubMed
    1. Alan S, Arsan S, Okulu E, Akin IM, Kilic A, Taskin S, et al. Effects of umbilical cord milking on the need for packed red blood cell transfusions and early neonatal hemodynamic adaptation in preterm infants born </=1500 g: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology 2014; Vol. 36, issue 8:e493‐e498. - PubMed
Armanian 2017 {published data only}
    1. Armanian AM, Ghasemi Tehrani H, Ansari M, Ghasemi S. Is "delayed umbilical cord clamping" beneficial for premature newborns?. International Journal of Pediatrics 2017;5:4909‐18.
    1. Armanian M. Is "delayed umbilical cord clamping" beneficial for premature newborns?. en.search.irct.ir/view/22000 (first received 14 February 2015).
Backes 2016 {published data only}
    1. Backes C, Copeland K, Iams JP, Giannone PJ, Bauer JA. Impact of delayed umbilical cord clamping at the limits of viability. International Conference of Transitional Care; 2013 19th April; Birmingham, UK. 2013.
    1. Backes CH, Huang H, Iams JD, Bauer JA, Giannone PJ. Timing of umbilical cord clamping among infants born at 22 through 27 weeks' gestation. Journal of Perinatology 2016;36(1):35‐40. [2800931] - PMC - PubMed
    1. Backes CH, Huang H, Luce WA, Schanbacher BL, Backes KA, Ehrenberg H, et al. Postnatal progenitor cells pools and delayed umbilical cord clamping at the limits of viability. Pediatric Academic Societies and Asian Society for Pediatric Research Joint Meeting; 2011 April 30‐May 3; Denver, Colorado, USA. 2011:441.
    1. Huang H, Eastman N, Schanbacher B, Backes C, Giannone P, Bauer JA. [2887.675] Delayed cord clamping improves gross motor skills in extremely premature infants at age 6‐9 months corrected age. Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting; 2016 April 30 ‐ May 3; Baltimore, USA. 2016.
    1. Huang H, Eastman N, Schanbacher B, Backes C, Giannone P, Bauer JA. [3821.208] Impact of delayed cord clamping on circulating progenitor cells in extremely premature infants. Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting; 2016 April 30 ‐ May 3; Baltimore, USA. 2016.
Baenziger 2007 {published data only}
    1. Baenziger O, Stolkin F, Keel, M, Siebenthal K, Fauchere JC, Kundu SD, et al. The influence of the timing of cord clamping on postnatal cerebral oxygenation in preterm neonates: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 2007;119:455‐9. - PubMed
Chu 2011 {published data only}
    1. Chu K, Whittle W, Windrim R, Shah P, Murphy K. The DUC trial: A pilot randomized controlled trial of immediate vs. delayed umbilical cord clamping in preterm infants born between 24 and 32 weeks gestation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2011;204(1 Suppl):S201.
CORD Pilot 2018 {published data only}
    1. Armstrong‐Buisseret L, Powers K, Dorling J, Bradshaw L, Johnson S, Mitchell E. Randomised trial of cord clamping and initial stabilisation at very preterm birth: neurodevelopmental outcomes at age two years (corrected for gestation at birth). NIHR Monograph 2019; Vol. Monograph still to be published as well as paper.
    1. Ayers S, Sawyer A, Chhoa C, Duley L. Clinicians’ and women’s experiences of two consent pathways in a trial of timing of clamping at very preterm birth: A qualitative study. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2016;123(Suppl 2):151.
    1. Bradshaw LE, Pushpa‐Rajah A, Dorling J, Mitchell EJ, Duley L, for the Cord Pilot Trial Collaborative Group. Cord pilot trial: update to randomised trial protocol. Trials 2015;16:407. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dorling J, Armstrong‐Buisseret L, Powers K, Bradshaw L, Johnson S, Mitchell E, et al. Randomised trial of delayed cord clamping and initial stabilisation at very preterm birth. Neurodevelopmental outcome at age 2 years CGA. Abstract presented at 7th Congress of the European Academy of Paediatric Societies. Paris, 2018.
    1. Duley L, Abbott J, Dorling J, Field D, Gyte G, Oddie S, et al. Timing of cord clamping and care at the bedside for very preterm birth: a randomised trial. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2013;120(Suppl s1):159.
Dai 2014 {published data only}
    1. Dai S, Jin X, Qi HJ. [Bu tong duan qi shi jian dui xin sheng er yu hou de ying xiang]. Modern Practical Medicine 2014;26:69‐71.
Das 2018 {published data only}
    1. Das B. Placental transfusion in delivery room in preterm neonates 30 to 33 6/7 weeks: an open label randomized controlled trial. http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=7688&EncHid=... (first received 18 February 2014).
    1. Das B, Sundaram V, Kumar P. [3842.16] Effect of placental transfusion on serum ferritin levels in moderately preterm neonates. Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting; 2015 April 25‐28; San Diego, California. 2015.
    1. Das B, Sundaram V, Kumar P, Mordi WT, Dhaliwal LK, Das R. Effect of placental transfusion on iron stores in moderately preterm neonates of 30‐33 weeks gestation. Indian Journal of Pediatrics 2018;85(3):172‐8. - PubMed
Datta 2017 {published data only}
    1. Datta V, Kumar A, Yadav R. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the role of brief delay in cord clamping in preterm neonates (34‐36 weeks) on short‐term neurobehavioural outcome. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 2017 [Epub ahead of print]. - PubMed
    1. Kumar A, Datta V. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the role of brief delay in cord clamping in preterm neonates (34‐36 weeks) on short term neurodevelopmental outcomes. Pediatric Academic Societies and Asian Society for Pediatric Research Joint Meeting; 2014 May 3‐6; Vancouver, Canada. 2014:Abstract no: 2945.606.
Dhaliwal 2014 {published data only}
    1. Dhaliwal LK, Anjumunnisa S, Kumar P, Saha PK, Venkataseshan S. Effects of placental transfusion in preterm birth. Journal of Maternal‐Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2014;27(Suppl 1):369.
Dipak 2017 {published data only}
    1. Kumar Dipak N, Nanavati RN, Kabra NK, Srinivasan A, Ananthan A. Effect of delayed cord clamping on hematocrit, and thermal and hemodynamic stability in preterm neonates: A randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatrics 2017;54(2):112‐5. - PubMed
Dong 2016 {published data only}
    1. Dong XY, Sun XF, Li MM, Yu ZB, Han SP. [Influence of delayed cord clamping on preterm infants with a gestational age of <32 weeks] [26687]. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi = Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics 2016;18(7):635‐8. - PMC - PubMed
Elimian 2014 {published data only}
    1. Elimian A, Goodman J, Escobedo M, Nightingale L, Knudtson E, Williams M. A randomized controlled trial of immediate versus delayed cord clamping in the preterm neonate. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2013;208(1 Suppl):S22. - PubMed
    1. Elimian A, Goodman J, Escobedo M, Nightingale L, Knudtson E, Williams M. Immediate compared with delayed cord clamping in the preterm neonate. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2014;124(6):1075‐9. - PubMed
El‐Naggar 2016 {published data only}
    1. El‐Naggar W. The effect of cord milking on hemodynamic status of preterm infants. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT01487187 (first received 7 December 2011).
    1. El‐Naggar W, Simpson D, Hussain A, Armson A, Dodds L, Warren A, et al. The effect of umbilical cord milking on hemodynamic status of preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 2016;21:e88.
    1. El‐Naggar W, Simpson D, Hussain A, Armson A, Dodds L, Warren A, et al. [3856.517] The effect of umbilical cord milking on hemodynamic status of preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting; 2016 April 30 ‐ May 3; Baltimore, USA. 2016.
    1. El‐Naggar W, Simpson D, Hussain A, Warren A, Robin W, McMillan D, et al. The effect of umbilical cord milking on cerebral blood flow of preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Pediatrics 2016; Vol. 175, issue 11:1698.
Gokmen 2011 {published data only}
    1. Gokmen Z, Ozkiraz S, Tarcan A, Kozanoglu I, Ozcimen EE, Ozbek N. Effects of delayed umbilical cord clamping on peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells in premature neonates. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 2011;39:323‐9. - PubMed
Hofmeyr 1988 {published data only}
    1. Hofmeyr GJ, Bolton KD, Bowen DC, Govan JJ. Periventricular/intraventricular haemorrhage and umbilical cord clamping. South African Medical Journal 1988;73:104‐6. - PubMed
    1. Hofmeyr GJ, Bolton KD, Bowen DC, Govan JJ. Periventricular/intraventricular hemorrhage and umbilical cord clamping. Proceedings of the 10th European Congress of Perinatal Medicine; 1986; Leipzig, Germany. 1986:309.
Hofmeyr 1993 {published data only}
    1. Hofmeyr GJ, Gobetz L, Bex PJ, Griendt M, Nikodem CV, Skapinker R, et al. Periventricular/intraventricular hemorrhage following early and delayed umbilical cord clamping: a randomized trial. Online Journal of Current Clinical Trials 1993 Doc No 110: [2002 words; 26 paragraphs]. - PubMed
    1. Hofmeyr GJ, Gobetz L, Bex PJ, Griendt M, Nikodem VC, Skapinker R, et al. Periventricular/intraventricular haemorrhage following early and delayed umbilical cord clamping. Letter to: Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Oxford 1991.
Hosono 2008 {published data only}
    1. Ghavam S, Batra D, Mercer J, Kugelman A, Hosono S, Oh W, et al. Effects of placental transfusion in extremely low birthweight infants: meta‐analysis of long‐ and short‐term outcomes. Transfusion 2014;54(4):1192‐8. - PubMed
    1. Hosono S, Mugishima H, Fujita H, Hosono A, Minato M, Okada T, et al. Umbilical cord milking reduces the need for red cell transfusions and improves neonatal adaptation in infants born less than 29 weeks' gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2008;93:F14‐9. - PubMed
    1. Hosono S, Mugishima H, Fujita H, Hosono A, Okada T, Takahashi S, et al. Blood pressure and urine output during the first 120 h of life in infants born at less than 29 weeks' gestation related to umbilical cord milking. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal Edition 2009;94(5):F328‐31. - PubMed
    1. Hosono S, Mugishima H, Yonezawa R, Fujita H, Makimoto M, Okada T, et al. The effects of umbilical cord milking on cardio‐pulmonary adaptation in preterm infants. Journal of Maternal‐Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 2008;21(Suppl 1):45.
Hosono 2015 {published data only}
    1. Hosono S. A multicenter randomized control study of the effect of umbilical cord milking in avoiding red cell transfusions in extremely immature infants. upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi‐open‐bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000001193 (first received 23 January 2008).
    1. Hosono S, Tamura M, Kusuda S, Hirano S, Fujimura M, Takahashi S. [2765.7] One‐time umbilical cord milking after cord cutting reduces the need for red blood cell transfusion and reduces the mortality rate in extremely preterm infants; a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting; 2015 April 25‐28; San Diego, California 2015.
    1. Hosono S, Tamura M, Kusuda S, Hirano S, Mori R, Fujimura M. [4470.5] Eighteen month corrected age developmental outcomes of extremely preterm infants enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of one‐time umbilical cord milking versus immediate cord clamping. Randomized controlled trial. Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting; 2016 April 30 ‐ May 3; Baltimore, USA. 2016.
Josephsen 2014 {published data only}
    1. Josephsen J, Vlastos E, Potter S, Al‐Hosni M. Milking the umbilical cord in extreme preterm infants. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2014;210(1 Suppl):S403‐4.
Katheria 2014 {published data only}
    1. Katheria A, Blank D, Rich W, Finer N. Umbilical cord milking improves transition in premature infants at birth. PLOS One 2014;9(4):e94085. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Katheria AC, Leone TA, Woelkers D, Garey DM, Rich W, Finer NN. The effects of umbilical cord milking on hemodynamics and neonatal outcomes in premature neonates. Journal of Pediatrics 2014;164(5):1045‐50. - PubMed
Katheria 2015 {published data only}
    1. Katheria A, Garey D, Truong G, Akshoomoff N, Steen J, Maldonado M, et al. A randomized clinical trial of umbilical cord milking vs delayed cord clamping in preterm infants: Neurodevelopmental outcomes at 22‐26 months of corrected age. Journal of Pediatrics 2018;194:76‐80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Katheria A, NCT03476980. Two year developmental follow‐up for premature infants receiving milking or delayed cord clamping: PREMOD2. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03476980 (first received 26 March 2018). [NCT03476980]
    1. Katheria AC, Truong G, Cousins L, Oshiro B, Finer NN. Umbilical cord milking versus delayed cord clamping in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2015;136(1):61‐9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Katheria AC, Truong G, Wade R, Nguyen T, Kim S, Arnell K, et al. [2765.6] Umbilical cord milking improves systemic blood flow at cesarean section in premature infants. Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting; 2015 April 25‐28; San Diego, California. 2015.
Kilicdag 2016 {published data only}
    1. Kilicdag H, Gulcan H, Hanta D, Torer B, Gokmen Z, Ozdemir SI, et al. Is umbilical cord milking always an advantage?. Journal of Maternal‐Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2016;29(4):615‐8. - PubMed
Kinmond 1993 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Kinmond S, Aitchison TC, Holland BM, Jones JG, Turner TL, Wardrop CA. Umbilical cord clamping and preterm infants: a randomised trial. BMJ 1993;306:172‐5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kinmond S, Aitchison TC, Holland BM, Jones JG, Turner TL, Wardrop CA. Umbilical cord clamping and preterm infants: a randomized trial. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 1993;42(3):328. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kinmond S, Hudson IR, Aitchison T, Holland BM, Turner TL, Jones JG, et al. Placento‐fetal transfusion in preterm infants. Proceedings of the Neonatal Society; 1990 March; London, UK. 1990.
Krueger 2015 {published data only}
    1. Krueger MS, Eyal FG, Peevy KJ, Hamm CR, Whitehurst RM, Lewis DF. Delayed cord clamping with and without cord stripping: A prospective randomized trial of preterm neonates. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2015;212(3):394.e1‐5. - PubMed
Kugelman 2007 {published data only}
    1. Kugelman A, Borenstein‐Levin L, Kessel A, Riskin A, Toubi E, Bader D. Immunologic and infectious consequences of immediate versus delayed umbilical cord clamping in premature infants: A prospective, randomized, controlled study. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 2009;37(3):281‐7. - PubMed
    1. Kugelman A, Borenstein‐Levin L, Riskin A, Chistyakov I, Ohel G, Gonen R, et al. Early versus delayed umbilical cord clamping in premature infants: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Conference Proceedings, Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting, Toronto, Canada. 2007 May 5‐8.
    1. Kugelman A, Borenstein‐Levin L, Riskin A, Christyakov I, Ohel G, Gonen R, et al. Immediate versus delayed umbilical cord clamping in premature neonates born < 35 weeks: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. American Journal of Perinatology 2007;24:307‐15. - PubMed
Kumar 2015 {published data only}
    1. Kumar B, Upadhyay A, Garg A, Gothwal S, Yadav AK, Sharma RS. [1580.592] Effect of umbilical cord milking on hematological parameters at 6 weeks of life in preterm newborns. Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting; 2015 April 25‐28; San Diego, California. 2015.
    1. Kumar B, Upadhyay A, Gothwal S, Jaiswal V, Joshi P, Dubey K. Umbilical cord milking and hematological parameters in moderate to late preterm neonates: a randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatrics 2015;52(9):753‐7. - PubMed
Malik 2013 {published data only}
    1. Malik AU, Shahnawaz K, Riaz A. Comparison between the efficacy of early and delayed umbilical cord clamping in preterm infants. Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences 2013;7(4):992‐5.
March 2013 {published data only}
    1. March M, Veciana M, Parson A. The efficacy of umbilical cord milking on the reduction of red blood cell transfusion rates in infants born between 24 and 28 6/7 weeks gestation ‐ A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2011;204(1 Suppl):S204.
    1. March MI, Hacker MR, Parson AW, Modest AM, De M. The effects of umbilical cord milking in extremely preterm infants: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Perinatology 2013;33(10):763‐7. - PMC - PubMed
McDonnell 1997 {published and unpublished data}
    1. McDonnell M, Henderson Smart DJ. Delayed umbilical cord clamping in preterm infants: a feasibility study. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 1997;33(4):308‐10. - PubMed
Mercer 2003 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Mercer JS, McGrath MM, Hensman A, Silver H, Oh W. Immediate and delayed cord clamping in infants born between 24 and 32 weeks: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of Perinatology 2003;23:466‐72. - PubMed
Mercer 2006 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Mercer JS, Vohr BR, Erickson‐Owens DA, Padbury JF, Oh W. Seven‐month developmental outcomes of very low birth weight infants enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of delayed versus immediate cord clamping. Journal of Perinatology 2010;30(1):11‐6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mercer JS, Vohr BR, Erickson‐Owens DA, Padbury JF, Oh W. Seven‐month neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of delayed versus immediate cord clamping. Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting; 2009 May 2‐5; Baltimore, USA. 2009.
    1. Mercer JS, Vohr BR, McGrath MM, Padbury JF, Wallach M, Oh W. Delayed cord clamping in very preterm infants reduces the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage and late‐onset sepsis: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 2006;117(4):1235‐42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mercer JS, Vohr BR, Oh W. Delayed cord clamping in very preterm infants reduces the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and late onset sepsis (LOS) [abstract]. Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting; 2005 May 14‐17; Washington DC, USA. 2005:Abstract no: 2618. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sommers R, Stonestreet BS, Laptook A, Yanowitz T, Oh W, Raker C. Hemodynamic effects of delayed umbilical cord clamping in premature infants. Pediatric Academic Societies and Asian Society for Pediatric Research Joint Meeting; 2011 April 30‐May 3; Denver, Colorado, USA. 2011:3535.2.
Mercer 2016 {published data only}
    1. Mercer JS, Erickson‐Owens DA, Vohr BR, Tucker R, Oh W, Padbury JF. [2765.8] Delayed cord clamping at birth improves motor scores at 18 to 22 months corrected age: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting; 2015 April 25‐28; San Diego, California. 2015.
    1. Mercer JS, Erickson‐Owens DA, Vohr BR, Tucker RJ, Parker AB, Oh W, et al. Effects of placental transfusion on neonatal and 18 month outcomes in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Pediatrics 2016; Vol. 168:50‐5. - PMC - PubMed
Nelle 1998 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Nelle M, Fischer S, Conze S, Beedgen B, Grischke EM, Linderkamp O. Effects of late cord clamping on circulation in prematures (VLBWI). Pediatric Research 1998;44(3):454.
Oh 2011 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Ghavam S, Batra D, Mercer J, Kugelman A, Hosono S, Oh W, et al. Effects of placental transfusion in extremely low birthweight infants: meta‐analysis of long‐ and short‐term outcomes. Transfusion 2014;54(4):1192‐8. - PubMed
    1. Oh W, Carlo WA, Fanaroff AA, McDonald S, Donovan EF, Poole K, et al. Delayed cord clamping in extremely low birth weight infants ‐ a pilot randomised controlled trial. Pediatric Research 2002;51(4 Suppl):365‐6.
    1. Oh W, Fanaroff AA, Carlo WA, Donovan EF, McDonald SA, Poole WK, et al. Effects of delayed cord clamping in very‐low‐birth‐weight infants. Journal of Perinatology 2011;31:S68‐S71. - PMC - PubMed
Pongmee 2010 {published data only}
    1. Pongmee P, Nuntnarumit P. Effects of umbilical cord milking on initial hematocrit and the need for blood transfusion in preterm infants. Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting; 2010 May 1‐4; Vancouver, Canada. 2010.
Rabe 2000 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Rabe H, Hentschel R, Brune T, Hulskamp G, Jorch G. A randomised study of delayed cord clamping: the starting point in treatment of anaemia of prematurity. Prenatal and Neonatal Medicine 1996;1 Suppl 1:174.
    1. Rabe H, Wacker A, Hulskamp G, Hornig‐Franz I, Jorch G. Late cord clamping benefits extrauterine adaptation [abstract]. Pediatric Research 1998;44(3):454.
    1. Rabe H, Wacker A, Hulskamp G, Hornig‐Franz I, Schulze‐Everding A, Harms E, et al. A randomised controlled trial of delayed cord clamping in very low birth weight preterm infants. European Journal of Pediatrics 2000;159(10):775‐7. - PubMed
Rabe 2011 {published data only}
    1. Ayers S, Sawyer A, During C, Rabe H. Parents report positive experiences about enrolling babies in a cord‐related clinical trial before birth. Acta Paediatrica 2015;104:e164‐70. - PubMed
    1. Rabe H. Effects of a slight delay in cord clamping time versus milking the cord in preterm infants. isrctn.com/ISRCTN86296143 (first received 29 September 2006).
    1. Rabe H, Dhanjal K, Stilton D, Ayers S, Holden D. Parents perception of giving antenatal consent to include their preterm infant into a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Klinische Padiatrie 2010;222(S 01):GNPI_PO_50.
    1. Rabe H, Jewison A, Alvarez JRF, Stilton D, Bradley R, Holden D. Randomized controlled trial (RCT): effects on blood pressure of 4 times milking of the cord versus slight delay of cord clamping in very low birth weight infants (VLBW). Klinische Padiatrie 2010;222(Suppl 1):GNPI_FV_30.
    1. Rabe H, Jewison A, Alvarez RF, Stilton D, Bradley R, Holden D. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) on 4 times milking of the cord versus slight delay of cord clamping in very low birth weight infants (VLBW): effects on circulation. Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting; 2010 May 1‐4; Vancouver, Canada. 2010.
Rana 2017 {published data only}
    1. Agarwal K. Delayed versus early umbilical cord clamping in preterm infants of less than 34 weeks of gestation. ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=5900 (first received 4 April 2013).
    1. Rana A, Agarwal K. Safety of delayed umbilical cord clamping in preterm neonates less than 34 weeks gestation. Indian Journal of Pediatrics 2017;84(5):414. - PubMed
Ranjit 2015 {published data only}
    1. Ranjit T, Nesargi S, Rao PN, Sahoo JP, Ashok C, Chandrakala BS, et al. Effect of early versus delayed cord clamping on hematological status of preterm infants at 6 wk of age. Indian Journal of Pediatrics 2015;82(1):29‐34. - PubMed
Salae 2016 {published data only}
    1. Salae R. Efficacy of delayed versus immediate cord clamping in late preterm newborn followed normal labor: a randomized control trial. clinicaltrials.in.th/index.php?tp=regtrials&menu=trialsearch&sme... (first received 8 June 2015).
    1. Salae R, Tanprasertkul C, Somprasit C, Bhamarapravatana C, Suwannarurk K. Efficacy of delayed versus immediate cord clamping in late preterm newborns following normal labour: randomised control trial. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 2016;99 Suppl 4:S1‐7. - PubMed
    1. Tanprasertkul C, Salae R, Somprasit C, Bhamarapravatana C, Suwannarurk K. Efficacy of delayed versus immediate cord clamping in late preterm newborns following normal labour: randomised control trial. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2016;123(Suppl 2):86‐7. - PubMed
Sekhavat 2008 {published data only}
    1. Sekhavat L, Tabatabaii A. Immediate and delayed cord clamping in infants born between 26 and 34 weeks. Journal of Maternal‐Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 2008;21(Suppl 1):181‐2.
Shi 2017 {published data only}
    1. Shi W, Peng J, Chen N. Effect of delayed cord clamping on outcome of delivery. Henan Journal of Preventive Medicine 2017; Vol. 28:85‐7, 93.
Strauss 2008 {published data only}
    1. Strauss RG, Mock DM. A randomized clinical trial comparing immediate vs delayed clamping of the umbilical cord in preterm infants. Transfusion 2007;47 Suppl:21A. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Strauss RG, Mock DM, Johnson KL, Cress GA, Burmeister LF, Zimmermann MB, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing immediate versus delayed clamping of the umbilical cord in preterm infants: short‐term clinical and laboratory endpoints. Transfusion 2008;48:658‐65. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Strauss RG, Mock MM, Johnson K, Mock NI, Cress G, Knosp L, et al. Circulating rbc volume, measured with biotinylated rbcs, is superior to the hct to document the hematologic effects of delayed versus immediate umbilical cord clamping in preterm neonates. Transfusion 2003;43:1168‐72. - PubMed
Tarnow‐Mordi 2017 {published data only}
    1. Popat H, Galea C, Evans N, Lingwood B, Colditz P, Halliday R, et al. Effect of delayed cord clamping on cerebral oxygenation in preterm infants <30 weeks gestation. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 2017;53(Suppl 2):80.
    1. Popat H, Galea C, Evans N, Lingwood B, Colditz PB, Halliday R, et al. Effect of delayed cord clamping on cerebral oxygenation in very preterm infants. Neonatology 2019; Vol. 115, issue 1:13‐20. - PubMed
    1. Popat H, Mann K, Buchan J, Brown R, Cornthwaite K, Waal K, et al. Australian placental transfusion study echo sub‐study: effect on systemic blood flow. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 2015;51(Suppl 1):17.
    1. Popat H, Mann K, Buchan J, Brown R, Cornthwaite K, Waal K, et al. [2765.4] Australian placental transfusion study echo sub‐study: effect on systemic blood flow. Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting; 2015 April 25‐28; San Diego, California. 2015.
    1. Popat H, Robledo KP, Sebastian L, Evans N, Gill A, Kluckow M, et al. Effect of delayed cord clamping on systemic blood flow: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Pediatrics. ACTRN12610000633088 2017; Vol. 178:81‐6.e2. - PubMed
Tiemersma 2015 {published data only}
    1. Tiemersma S, Heistein J, Ruijne R, Lopez G, Lobenstei J, Rheenen P. Delayed cord clamping in South African neonates with expected low birthweight: a randomised controlled trial. Tropical Medicine & International Health 2015;20(2):177‐83. - PubMed
Ultee 2008 {published data only}
    1. Ultee CA, Deure J, Swart J, Lasham C, Baar AL. Delayed cord clamping in preterm infants delivered at 34‐36 weeks' gestation: a randomised controlled trial. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2008;93:F20‐3. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Aitchison {unpublished data only}
    1. Aitchison T, Beattie B, Cameron A, Halliday H, Holland B, Wardrop C. Placento‐fetal (Autologous) transfusion (PFTx) at birth in infants born preterm: a randomised, controlled trial. Personal communication.
Akhtar 2014 {published data only}
    1. Akhtar S, Bora R. Effect of umbilical cord milking on haemoglobin & serum ferritin levels at six months of age in infants ‐ a randomized controlled trial. Pediatric Academic Societies and Asian Society for Pediatric Research Joint Meeting; 2014 May 3‐6; Vancouver, Canada. 2014:Abstract no: 2945.604.
Ashish 2017 {published data only}
    1. Ashish KC, Malqvist M, Rana N, Ranneberg LJ, Andersson O. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping on anaemia at 8 and 12 months and later neurodevelopment in late pre‐term and term infants; a facility‐based, randomized‐controlled trial in Nepal. BMC Pediatrics 2016;16(1):35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kc A, Rana N, Malqvist M, Jarawka Ranneberg L, Subedi K, Andersson O. Effects of delayed umbilical cord clamping vs early clamping on anemia in infants at 8 and 12 months: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatrics 2017; Vol. 171, issue 3:264‐70. - PubMed
Chopra 2016 {published data only}
    1. Chopra A, Kier N, Garg P, Thakur A. [4110.102] Effect of delayed versus early cord clamping on neonatal outcomes and iron stores at 3 months in small for gestational age babies ‐ a randomized controlled trial. Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting; 2016 April 30 ‐ May 3; Baltimore, USA. 2016.
    1. Chopra A, Kler N, Thakur A, Garg P. Delayed vs early cord clamping in small for gestational age infants >35 weeks gestation: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 2016; Vol. 62, issue Suppl 1:657.
Frank 1967 {published data only}
    1. Frank DJ, Gabriel M. Timing of cord ligation and newborn respiratory distress. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1967;97:1142‐4. - PubMed
Garabedian 2016 {published data only}
    1. Garabedian C, Rakza T, Drumez E, Poleszczuk M, Ghesquiere L, Wibaut B, et al. Benefits of delayed cord clamping in red blood cell alloimmunization. Pediatrics 2016;137(3):e20153236. - PubMed
Ibrahim 2000 {published data only}
    1. Ibrahim HM, Krouskop RW, Lewis DF, Dhanireddy R. Placental transfusion: umbilical cord clamping in preterm infants. Journal of Perinatology 2000;120:351‐4. - PubMed
Katheria 2016 {published data only}
    1. Katheria A, Poeltler D, Durham J, Steen J, Rich W, Arnell K, et al. [4470.5] Eighteen‐month corrected age developmental outcomes of extremely preterm infants enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of one‐time umbilical milking versus immediate cord clamping. Randomized controlled trial. Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting; 2016 April 30 ‐ May 3; Baltimore, USA. 2016.
Kattwinkel 2016 {published data only}
    1. Kattwinkel J. VentFiirst: A multicenter RCT of assisted ventilation during delayed cord clamping for extremely preterm infants. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT02742454 2016.
Mungkornkaew 2015 {published data only}
    1. Mungkornkaew S, Siwadune T. The difference of hematocrit in term and preterm vaginal births in different timing of delayed cord clamping. Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2015;23:223‐30.
Narendra 1998 {published data only}
    1. Narendra A, Beckett C, Aitchinson T, Kyle E, Coutts J, Turner T, et al. Is it possible to promote placental transfusion (PTFx) at preterm delivery?. Pediatric Research 1998;44:454A.
Ruangkit 2015 {published data only}
    1. Ruangkit C, Moroney V, Viswanathan S, Bhola M. [1175.8] Safety of delayed umbilical cord clamping in multiple and singleton premature infants ‐ a quality improvement study. Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting; 2015 April 25‐28; San Diego, California. 2015. - PubMed
Saigal 1972 {published data only}
    1. Saigal S, O'Neill A, Surainder Y, Chua LB, Usher R. Placental transfusion and hyperbilirubinemia in the premature. Pediatrics 1972;49(3):406‐19. - PubMed
Saigal 1977 {published data only}
    1. Saigal S, Usher RH. Symptomatic neonatal plethora. Biology of the Neonate 1977;32:62‐72. - PubMed
Spears 1966 {published data only}
    1. Spears RL, Anderson GV, Brotman S, Farrier J, Kwan J, Masto A, et al. The effect of early vs late cord clamping on signs of respiratory distress. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1966;95:564‐8. - PubMed
Taylor 1963 {published data only}
    1. Taylor P, Bright N, Birchard E. Effect of early vs delayed clamping of the umbilical cord on the clinical condition of the newborn infant. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1963;86:893‐8. - PubMed
Tipwaree 2015 {published data only}
    1. Tipwaree S. The effect of umbilical cord milking in term infants followed by cesarean section delivery: a randomized controlled trial. clinicaltrials.in.th/index.php?tp=regtrials&menu=trialsearch&sme... (first received 28 May 2015).
Yadav 2015 {published data only}
    1. Yadav AK, Upadhyay A, Gothwal S, Dubey K, Mandal U, Yadav CP. Comparison of three types of intervention to enhance placental redistribution in term newborns: randomized control trial. Journal of Perinatology 2015;35:720‐4. - PubMed
    1. Yadav AK, Upadhyay A, Jaiswal V, Gupta NK, Sharma RS, Gothwal S, et al. [2765.5] To compare the effect of delayed cord clamping, umbilical cord milking and delayed cord clamping with milking on haematological parameters in term neonates. Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting; 2015 April 25‐28; San Diego, California. 2015.
Yasmeen 2014 {published data only}
    1. Yasmeen S, Shahidullah M, Mannan MA, Dey AC, Chowdhury RB, Haque AQMS, et al. Iron status in early versus delayed cord clamping groups of preterm neonates delivered in a tertiary level hospital. Journal of Armed Forces Medical College Bangladesh 2014;10:62‐5.
Zisovska 2008 {published data only}
    1. Zisovska E, Lazarevska L, Spasova L, Zivkovik J. The effect of delayed cord clamping on the need for blood transfusion. Transfusion Alternatives in Transfusion Medicine 2008;10(Suppl 1):25, Abstract no. P17.

References to studies awaiting assessment

Das 2018a {published data only}
    1. Das B, Sundaram V, Tarnow‐Mordi W, Ghadge A, Dhaliwal LK, Kumar P. Placental transfusion in preterm neonates of 30‐33 weeks' gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Perinatology 2018;38(5):496‐504. [CTRI/2014/02/004414] - PubMed
El‐Naggar 2018 {published data only}
    1. El‐Naggar W, Simpson D, Hussain A, Armson A, Dodds L, Warren A, et al. Cord milking versus immediate clamping in preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 14 June 2018 [Epub ahead of print]. - PubMed
Hu 2015 {published data only}
    1. Hu X, Xu X. The Effects of Different Cord Clamping Time in Preterm Infants by Vaginal Delivery [Master's Degree Thesis]. Zhejiang University, 2015.
    1. Hu X, Xu X. The effects of different cord clamping time in vaginal birth preterm infants. 31st International Confederation of Midwives Triennial Congress. Midwives ‐ Making a Difference in the World; 2017 June 18‐22; Toronto, Canada. 2017:Abstract no: A12.02.
Hua 2010 {published data only}
    1. Hua SP, Zhang HY, Zhou H, Zhang SH, Chen W, Xie CL. Effect of time of clamping umbilical cord on outcome of mothers and newborns. Journal of Hainan Medical College 2010;16:1572‐5.
Kazemi 2017 {published data only}
    1. Kazemi MV, Akbarianrad Z, Zahedpasha Y, Haghshenas Mojaveri M, Mehraein R. Effects of delayed cord clamping on intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants. Iranian Journal of Pediatrics 2017;27(5):e6570.
Leal 2018 {published data only}
    1. Leal VL, Bueno LP, Vilaplana LC, Montero EN, Blanco MM, Romero CF, et al. Effect of milking maneuver in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 2018 [Epub ahead of print]. - PubMed
Li 2018 {published data only}
    1. Li J, Wang W, Luo D, Dai Q‐L, Gan X‐Q, Yu B. Does intact umbilical cord milking increase infection rates in preterm infants with premature prolonged rupture of membranes?. Journal of Maternal‐Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 2018 [Epub ahead of print]. - PubMed
Medina 2014 {published data only}
    1. Medina IMF. Late clamping of the umbilical cord in premature neonates: The real haemodynamic benefits. Enfermeria Clinica 2014;24(5):305‐8. - PubMed
Ram Mothan 2018 {published data only}
    1. Ram Mohan G, Shashidhar A, Chandrakala BS, Nesargi S, Suman Rao PN. Umbilical cord milking in preterm neonates requiring resuscitation: a randomized controlled trial. Resuscitation 5 July 2018 [Epub ahead of print]. - PubMed
Song 2017 {published data only}
    1. Song SY, Kim Y, Kang BH, Yoo HJ, Lee M. Safety of umbilical cord milking in very preterm neonates: a randomized controlled study. Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 2017;60(6):527‐34. - PMC - PubMed
Wang 2018 {published data only}
    1. Wang M, Mercer JS, Padbury JF. Delayed cord clamping in infants with suspected intrauterine growth restriction. Journal of Pediatrics 2018; Vol. 201:264‐8. - PubMed
Weeks 2018 {published data only}
    1. Weeks A, Bewley S. Improbable, but plausible, research study: a randomised controlled trial of premature cord clamping vs. neonatal venesection to achieve routine prophylactic neonatal red cell reduction. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2018;111(8):270‐5. - PMC - PubMed

References to ongoing studies

Aghai 2018 {published data only}
    1. Aghai ZH, Katheria A, NCT03657394. Short‐term outcomes of umbilical cord milking in term and late preterm neonates who are depressed at birth. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03657394 (first received 5 September 2018). [NCT03657394]
    1. Aghai ZH, Katheria A, NCT03681314. Long‐term outcomes of umbilical cord milking in term and late preterm neonates who are depressed at birth. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03681314 (first received 24 September 2018). [NCT03681314]
    1. Aghai ZH, Katheria A, NCT03682042. Long‐term outcomes of umbilical cord milking in term and late preterm neonates with moderate to severe hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03682042 (first received 24 September 2018). [NCT03682042]
Allam 2018 {published data only}
    1. Allam N, ACTRN12618000758202p. Delayed fetal cord clamping in premature labour: the effect on fetal haemoglobin, bilirubin and neonatal death, maternal haemoglobin, neonatal ICU admission and postpartum haemorrhage. https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=1261... (first received 7 May 2018).
Al‐Wassia 2016 {published data only}
    1. NCT02996799, Al‐Wassia H. Efficacy and safety of deferred umbilical cord clamping compared to umbilical cord milking in preterm infants: a randomized clinical trial. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT02996799 (first received 3 December 2016).
Anusha 2017 {published data only}
    1. Anusha S, CTRI/2017/01/007671. Early cord clamping versus delayed cord clamping in very low birth weight neonates. ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=16653 (first received 11 January 2017).
Bhriguvanshi 2017 {published data only}
    1. Bhriguvanshi A. The effects of umbilical cord milking in neonates requiring resuscitation at birth: a randomized controlled trial. ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=18641 (first received 24 August 2017).
Bienstock 2011 {published data only}
    1. Bienstock J. Milking the umbilical cord versus immediate clamping in pre‐term infants <33 weeks: a randomized controlled trial. ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov/) [accessed 3 July 2015] 2011.
Carroli 2017 {published data only}
    1. Carroli G, ISRCTN12219110. Early compared to delayed umbilical cord clamping in very small prematurely born babies: a study to know which one is better for infant health. isrctn.com/ISRCTN12219110 (first received 30 March 2017).
Chamnanvanakij 2015 {published data only}
    1. Chamnanvanakij S. Effect of delayed cord clamping versus cord milking in infants born at <34 weeks’ gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Thai Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.clinicaltrials.in.th/) [accessed 3 July 2015] [accessed 3 July 2015] 2015.
Dempsey 2016 {published data only}
    1. Dempsey E, ISRCTN92719670. Clamping the umbilical cord in premature deliveries (CUPID). http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN92719670 (first received 25 January 2016).
De Paco Matallana 2013 {published data only}
    1. Paco Matallana C. DElayed COrd CLAmping versus early cord clamping in preterm infants born between 24 and 34 weeks. isrctn.com/ISRCTN66018314 (first received 6 October 2013).
Driggers 2013 {published data only}
    1. Driggers RW. Delayed umbilical cord clamping versus cord milking in preterm neonate ‐ a randomized, controlled trial. ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov/) [accessed 3 July 2015] 2013.
Gomaa 2017 {published data only}
    1. Gomaa M, NCT03147846. The hematologic impact of umbilical cord milking versus deferred cord clamping in premature neonates. a randomized controlled trial. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT03147846 (first received 10 May 2017).
Gupta 2018 {published data only}
    1. Gupta A, CTRI/2018/08/015204. Early versus delayed cord clamping in IUGR preterms a randomised controlled study. http://www.ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=25064 (first received 6 August 2018).
Haghshenas 2014 {published data only}
    1. Haghshenas M. Comparative study of the effect of delayed versus early cord clamping on the incidence of intra ventricular hemorrhage in preterm neonate. Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (http://www.irct.ir/) [accessed 3 July 2015] 2014.
Hao 2018 {published data only}
    1. Hao P, ChiCTR1800018366. Effect of delayed cord clamping versus umbilical cod milking on cerebral blood flow in preterm infant: a randomized, double‐blind controlled trial. http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=30981 (first received 13 September 2018).
Hemmati 2014 {published data only}
    1. Hemmati F. Comparing the effect of delayed versus immediate cord clamping on the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) in preterm neonates with gestational age =34 weeks in Hafez & Zeynab hospitals from September 2012 to December 2013. Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (http://www.irct.ir/) [accessed 3 July 2015] 2014.
Holland 1998 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}
    1. Holland BM. Placento‐fetal (autologous) transfusion at birth in infants born preterm: a randomised controlled trial. Personal communication 1998.
Isac 2017 {published data only}
    1. Isac M. Effect of umbilical cord milking of late preterm and term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes in a tertiary care hospital in South India: a randomized control trial. ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=19631 (first received 3 October 2017).
Jomjak 2018 {published data only}
    1. Jomjak P, TCTR20180817001. To compare the effects of delayed versus early cord clamping on neonatal outcomes in preterm (gestational age at >24 weeks to 36+6 weeks) and maternal outcomes. http://www.clinicaltrials.in.th/index.php?tp=regtrials&menu=trialsea... (first received 14 August 2018).
Katheria 2017 {published data only}
    1. Katheria A, NCT03019367. Premature infants receiving milking or delayed cord clamping: randomized controlled multicenter non‐inferiority trial. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03019367 (first received 12 January 2017).
    1. Katheria A, NCT03145142. PREMOD2 NIRS substudy ‐ a randomized trial of cerebral oxygen saturation in infants randomized to umbilical cord milking or delayed cord clamping. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT03145142 (first received 9 May 2017).
Katheria 2018 {published data only}
    1. Katheria A, NCT03621943. Umbilical cord milking in non‐vigorous infants developmental followup (MINVIFU). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03621943 (first received 9 August 2018). [NCT03621943]
    1. Katheria A, NCT03621956. Umbilical cord milking in non‐vigorous infants ‐ NIRS Sub‐study (MINVI_NIRS). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03621956 (first received 9 August 2018). [NCT03621956]
    1. Katheria A, NCT03631940. Umbilical cord milking in non‐vigorous infants. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03631940 (first received 15 August 2018). [NCT03631940]
Liu 2018 {published data only}
    1. Liu J, ChiCTR1800017865. Delayed cord clamping prevents respiratory distress of infants delivered by selective cesarean section in between 34‐38 weeks of gestational age, a randomized controlled trial. http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=30199 (1first received 8 August 2018). [ChiCTR1800017865]
Martin 2013 {published data only}
    1. Martin J. Timing of umbilical cord clamping after vaginal or cesarean preterm birth. ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov/) [accessed 4 June 2015] 2013.
Mirzaeian 2018 {published data only}
    1. Mirzaeian S, IRCT20180201038586N1. Investigation and comparison of neonatal complications of two methods of umbilical cord milking and early cord clamping in neonates. https://en.irct.ir/trial/29424 (first received 9 March 2018).
Nour 2018a {published data only}
    1. Nour I, NCT03731546. Effect of delayed cord clamping in preterm neonates with placental insufficiency. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03731546 (first received 6 November 2018). [NCT03731546]
Nour 2018b {published data only}
    1. Nour I, NCT03731611. Impact of umbilical cord milking in preterm neonates with placental insufficiency. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03731611 (first received 6 November 2018). [NCT03731611]
Panichkul 2015 {published data only}
    1. Panichkul P. Effects of delayed versus early cord clamping in late preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. Thai Clinical Trials Registry http://www.clinicaltrials.in.th/ [accessed 28 June 2015] 2015.
Perlman 2015 {published data only}
    1. Perlman J. The effects of delayed cord clamping on postnatal circulatory status in preterm neonates. ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov/) [accessed 3 July 2015] 2015.
    1. Spaight M, McKinsey S, Perlman J. [375] A randomized study of delayed cord clamping (DCC) in preterm neonates; preliminary observations. Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting; 2016 April 30 ‐ May 3; Baltimore, USA. 2016.
    1. Spaight M, McKinsey S, Perlman J. [4110.103] A randomized study of delayed cord clamping (DCC) in preterm neonates; preliminary observations. Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting; 2016 April 30 ‐ May 3; Baltimore, USA. 2016.
Ping 2010 {published data only}
    1. Ping HS. Immediate vs delayed cord clamping on newborns (no). ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov/) (accessed 12.05.2010) 2010.
Puiggros 2014 {published data only}
    1. Puiggros MD. Umbilical cord milking compared with delayed cord clamping to increase placental transfusion in preterm infants less than 34 weeks' gestation born by cesarean section. randomised clinical trial. ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov/) [accessed 3 July 2015] 2014.
Ruangkit 2017 {published data only}
    1. Ruangkit C, TCTR20170125001. A randomized controlled trial of immediate versus delayed umbilical cord clamping in preterm infants of multiple births. clinicaltrials.in.th/index.php?tp=regtrials&menu=trialsearch&sme... (first received 25 January 2017).
Shahgheibi 2018 {published data only}
    1. Shahgheibi S, IRCT20141208020249N2. The delayed umbilical cord clamping effects on early outcome in preterm neonates. https://en.irct.ir/trial/17924 (first received 1 July 2018).
Smith 2014 {published data only}
    1. Smith K. Delayed clamping and milking the umbilical cord in preterm infants. ClinicalTrials.gov [accessed 25 May 2014] 2014.
Tanthawat 2017 {published data only}
    1. Tanthawat S, TCTR20170201003. The effect of one‐time umbilical cord milking and early cord clamping in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial (one‐time umbilical cord milking). clinicaltrials.in.th/index.php?tp=regtrials&menu=trialsearch&sme... (first received 1 February 2017).
Thukral 2016 {published data only}
    1. Thukral A, CTRI/2016/11/007470. Comparison of umbilical cord milking with delayed cord clamping in late preterm and term neonates: randomized control trial. www.ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=14204 (first received 16 November 2016).
Upahyay 2014 {published data only}
    1. Upahyay A. Effect of umbilical cord milking on hematological parameters at 6 weeks of life in pre term newborns: a randomised control trial. ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=10367 (first received 11 December 2014).
Varanattu 2017 {published data only}
    1. Varanattu M, NCT03200301. Effect of intact umbilical cord milking versus immediate cord clamping on neonatal outcomes and first year neurodevelopmental outcomes in very preterm infants ‐ a randomised controlled trial. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT03200301 (first received 27 June 2017).
Whitehead 2014 {published data only}
    1. Whitehead V. Effects of delayed cord clamp and/or indomethacin on preterm infant brain injury. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02221219 (first received 20 August 2014).
Xie 2017 {published data only}
    1. Xie L, NCT03023917. The study on umbilical cord milking to prevent and decrease the severity of anemia in preterms‐‐a multi‐center randomized controlled trial. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT03023917 (first received 18 January 2017).
Yared 2015 {published data only}
    1. Yared E, NCT02337088. Delayed cord clamping at 30 vs. 60 seconds for very low birth weight infants: a randomized controlled trial. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02337088 (first received 13 January 2015).

Additional references

Aarnoudse‐Moens 2009
    1. Aarnoudse‐Moens CS, Weisglas‐Kuperus N, Goudoever JB, Oosterlaan J. Meta‐analysis of neurobehavioral outcomes in very preterm and/or very low birth weight children. Pediatrics 2009;124(2):717‐28. - PubMed
Aflaifel 2012
    1. Aflaifel N, Weeks A. Push, pull, squeeze, clamp: 100 years of changes in the management of the third stage of labour as described by Ten Teachers. BMJ 2012;345:e8270. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e8270] - DOI - PubMed
Al‐Wassia 2015
    1. Al‐Wassia H, Shah PS. Efficacy and safety of umbilical cord milking at birth: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association Pediatrics 2015;169(1):18‐25. - PubMed
Anderson 2003
    1. Anderson P, Doyle LW. Neurobehavioral outcomes of school‐age children born extremely low birth weight or very preterm in the 1990s. JAMA 2003;289(24):3264‐72. - PubMed
Arnold 2013
    1. Arnold L, Sawyer A, Rabe H, Abbott J, Gyte G, Duley L, et al. Parents' first moments with their very preterm babies: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2013;3:e002487. [DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002487] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Backes 2014
    1. Backes CH, Rivera BK, Haque U, Bridge JA, Smith CV, Hutchon DJR, et al. Placental transfusion strategies in very preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2014;124(1):47‐56. - PubMed
Batey 2017
    1. Batey N, Yoxall CW, Fawke JA, Duley L, Dorling J. Fifteen‐minute consultation: stabilisation of the high‐risk newborn infant beside the mother. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Education and Practice Edition 2017;102(5):235–8. - PubMed
Begley 2019
    1. Begley CM, Gyte GML, Devane D, McGuire W, Weeks A, Biesty LM. Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2019, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007412.pub5] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Bhatt 2013
    1. Bhatt S, Alison BJ, Wallace EM, Crossley KJ, Gill AW, Kluckow M, et al. Delaying cord clamping until ventilation onset improves cardiovascular function at birth in preterm lambs. Journal of Physiology 2013;591(Pt 8):2113‐26. - PMC - PubMed
Bhutta 2002
    1. Bhutta AT, Cleves MA, Casey PH, Cradock MM, Anand KJ. Cognitive and behavioral outcomes of school‐aged children who were born preterm: a meta‐analysis. JAMA 2002;288(6):728‐37. - PubMed
Blank 2018
    1. Blank DA, Polglase GR, Kluckow M, Gill AW, Crossley KJ, Moxham A, et al. Haemodynamic effects of umbilical cord milking in premature sheep during the neonatal transition. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2018;103(6):F539‐46. [DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314005] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Boere 2015
    1. Boere I, Roest AA, Wallace E, Harkel AD, Haak MC, Morley CJ, et al. Umbilical blood flow patterns directly after birth before delayed cord clamping. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2015;100:F121‐5. [DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307144] - DOI - PubMed
Chaparro 2006
    1. Chaparro CM, Neufeld LM, Alavez GT, Cedillo RE, Dewey KG. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping on iron status in Mexican infants: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006;367:1997‐2004. - PubMed
Committee 2012
    1. Committee on Obstetric Practice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No.543: Timing of umbilical cord clamping after birth. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2012;120(6):1522‐6. [DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000423817.47165.48] - DOI - PubMed
Dawes 1968
    1. Dawes GS. Chapter 13. Foetal and Neonatal Physiology; a Comparative Study of the Changes At Birth. Chicago, Year Book Medical Publishers, 1968.
Duley 2014
    1. Duley L, Askie L, Yang M. Cord clamping and placental transfusion at preterm birth prospective meta‐analysis. http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42013004405 2014; Vol. Accessed 1 June 2014.
Duley 2015
    1. Duley L, Gyte G. When should the umbilical cord be clamped?. BMJ 2015;351:h4206. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h4206] - DOI - PubMed
Farrar 2011
    1. Farrar D, Airey R, Law GR, Tuffnell D, Cattle B, Duley L. Measuring placental transfusion for term births: weighing babies with cord intact. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2011;118(1):70‐5. - PubMed
Fogarty 2018
    1. Fogarty M, Osborn DA, Askie L, Seidler AL, Hunter K, Lui K, et al. Delayed versus early umbilical cord clamping for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2018;218(1):1‐18. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017] - DOI - PubMed
Gallos 2018
    1. Gallos ID, Papadopoulou A, Man R, Athanasopoulos N, Tobias A, Price MJ, et al. Uterotonic agents for preventing postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta‐analysis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011689.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Ghavam 2014
    1. Ghavam S, Batra D, Mercer J, Kugelman A, Hosono S, Oh W, et al. Effects of placental transfusion in extremely low birthweight infants: meta‐analysis of long‐ and short‐term outcomes. Transfusion 2014;54:1192‐8. - PubMed
GradePro 2015 [Computer program]
    1. McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime). GRADEpro GDT. Version Accessed 19 February 2018. Hamilton (ON): McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime), 2015.
Gunther 1957
    1. Gunther M. The transfer of blood between baby and placenta in the minutes after birth. Lancet 1957;272(6982):1277‐80. - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JP, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Hofmeyr 2015
    1. Hofmeyr GJ, Mshweshwe NT, Gulmezoglu AM. Controlled cord traction for the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008020.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Holland 1991
    1. Holland BM, Wardrop CA. Anaemias of the preterm infant. In: Turner TL editor(s). Perinatal Haematological Problems. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 1991:121‐35.
Hooper 2015
    1. Hooper SB, Polglase GR, Pas AB. A physiological approach to the timing of umbilical cord clamping at birth. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2015;100(4):F355‐60. [DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305703] - DOI - PubMed
Hooper 2017
    1. Hooper SB, Crossley KJ, Zahra VA, Vonderen J, Moxham A, Gill AW, et al. Effect of body position and ventilation on umbilical artery and venous blood flows during delayed umbilical cord clamping in preterm lambs. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2017;102(4):F312‐9. [DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311159] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Hudson 1990
    1. Hudson IRB, Holland BM, Jones JG, Turner TL, Wardrop CA. First day total circulating red cell volume (RCV) predicts outcome in preterm infants. Pediatric Research 1990;27(4 Pt 2):209A.
Hutchon 2008
    1. Hutchon DJ, Thakur I. Resuscitate with the placental circulation intact. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2008;93(5):451. - PubMed
Katheria 2017a
    1. Katheria AC, Brown MK, Rich W, Arnell K. Providing a placental transfusion in newborns who need resuscitation. Frontiers in Pediatrics 2017;5:1. - PMC - PubMed
Katheria 2017b
    1. Katheria AC, Lakshminrusimha S, Rabe H, McAdams R, Mercer JS. Placental transfusion – a review. Journal of Perinatology 2017;37(2):105‐11. [DOI: 10.1038/jp.2016.151] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Kluckow 2015
    1. Kluckow M, Hooper SB. Using physiology to guide time to cord clamping. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2015;20(4):225‐31. [DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2015.03.002] - DOI - PubMed
Knol 2018
    1. Knol R, Brouwer E, Vernooij AS, Klumper FJ, DeKoninck P, Hooper SB, et al. Clinical aspects of incorporating cord clamping into stabilisation of preterm infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2018;103:F493–7. [DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-314947] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Linderkamp 1978
    1. Linderkamp O, Versmold HT, Fendel H, Reigel KP, Betke K. Association of neonatal respiratory distress with birth asphyxia and deficiency of red cell mass in premature infants. European Journal of Paediatrics 1978;129:167‐73. - PubMed
Manley 2017
    1. Manley BJ, Owen LS, Hooper SB, Jacobs SE, Cheong JL, Doyle LW, et al. Towards evidence‐based resuscitation of the newborn infant. Lancet 2017;389(10079):1639‐48. [DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30547-0] - DOI - PubMed
Marlow 2015
    1. Marlow N. Is survival and neurodevelopmental impairment at 2 years of age the gold standard outcome for neonatal studies?. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2015;100(1):F82‐F4. - PMC - PubMed
McDonald 2013
    1. McDonald SJ, Middleton P, Dowswell T, Morris PS. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 7. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004074.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Meher 2014
    1. Meher S, Alfirevic Z. Choice of primary outcomes in randomised trials and systematic reviews evaluating interventions for preterm birth prevention: a systematic review. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2014;121:1188‐96. - PubMed
Mercer 2002
    1. Mercer JS, Skovgaard RL. Neonatal transitional physiology: a new paradigm. Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing 2002;15(4):56‐75. - PubMed
Moser 2007
    1. Moser K, Macfarlane A, Chow YH, Hilder L, Dattani N. Introducing new data on gestation‐specific infant mortality among babies born in 2005 in England and Wales. Health Statistics Quarterly / Office for National Statistics 2007;35:13‐27. - PubMed
NICE 2015
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Preterm labour and birth. NICE Guideline. London, 2015. - PubMed
O'Donnell 2017
    1. O'Donnell CP. The timing of cord clamping for preterm infants. New England Journal of Medicine 2017;377(25):2488‐9. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMe1714522] - DOI - PubMed
Oddie 2014
    1. Oddie S, Rhodes P. Barriers to deferred cord clamping in preterm infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2014;99(5):F391‐4. - PMC - PubMed
Perlman 2010
    1. Perlman JM, Wyllie J, Kattwinkel J, Atkins DL, Chameides L, Goldsmith JP, et al. Part 11: Neonatal Resuscitation: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation 2010;122(16 suppl 2):S516‐538. - PubMed
Petrou 2003
    1. Petrou S, Mehta Z, Hockley C, Cook‐Mozaffari P, Henderson J, Goldacre M. The impact of preterm birth on hospital inpatient admissions and costs during the first 5 years of life. Pediatrics 2003;112(6 Pt 1):1290‐7. - PubMed
Poscencheg 2015
    1. Poscencheg M, Kirpalani H. Placental transfusion at birth: do we have all the answers?. Journal of the American Medical Association Pediatrics 2015;169(1):9‐11. - PubMed
Prendiville 1989
    1. Prendiville WJ, Elbourne DR. Care during the third stage of labour. In: Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC editor(s). Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth. Vol. 2, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989:1145‐69.
Rabe 2008
    1. Rabe H, Reynolds G, Diaz‐Rossello J. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of a brief delay in clamping the umbilical cord of preterm infants. Neonatology 2008;93:138‐44. - PubMed
RevMan 2014 [Computer program]
    1. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Saigal 2008
    1. Saigal S, Doyle LW. An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet 2008;371(9608):261‐9. - PubMed
Salati 2019
    1. Salati JA, Leathersich SJ, Williams MJ, Cuthbert A, Tolosa JE. Prophylactic oxytocin for the third stage of labour to prevent postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2019, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001808.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Sawyer 2013
    1. Sawyer A, Rabe H, Abbott J, Gyte G, Duley L, Ayers S. Parents’ experiences and satisfaction with care during the birth of their very preterm baby: a qualitative study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2013;120(5):637–43. - PMC - PubMed
Sawyer 2015
    1. Sawyer A, Ayers S, Bertullies S, Thomas M, Weeks AD, Yoxall CW, et al. Providing immediate neonatal care and resuscitation at birth beside the mother: parents' views, a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2015;5(9):e008495. - PMC - PubMed
Schoonakker 2013
    1. Schoonakker BD, Dorling J, Oddie S, Batra D, Grace N, Duley L. Bedside resuscitation of preterm infants with cord intact is achievable using standard resuscitaire. European Society for Pediatric Research; Oporto, Portugual 2013. 2013;Available at p430 of:http://www.mcaevents.org/t/files/9349_abstract_book_‐_25sett13‐it‐it.pdf.
Sweet 2017
    1. Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, Hallman M, Ozek E, Plavka R, et al. European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome ‐ 2016 Update. Neonatology 2017;111(2):107‐25. - PubMed
Tarnow‐Mordi 2014
    1. Tarnow‐Mordi WO, Duley L, Field D, Marlow N, Morris J, Newnham J, et al. Timing of cord clamping in very preterm infants: more evidence is needed. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2014;211(2):118‐23. - PubMed
Te Pas 2018
    1. Pas AB. Timing is everything. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2018;103(1):F2‐F3. - PubMed
Thomas 2014
    1. Thomas M, Yoxall C, Weeks A, Duley L. Providing newborn resuscitation at the mother's bedside: assessing the safety, usability and acceptability of a mobile trolley. BMC Pediatrics 2014;14:135. - PMC - PubMed
Vain 2014
    1. Vain NE, Satragno DS, Gorenstein AN, Gordillo JE, Berazategui JP, Alda MG, et al. Effect of gravity on volume of placental transfusion: a multicentre, randomised, non‐inferiority trial. Lancet 2014;384(9939):235‐40. [DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60197-5] - DOI - PubMed
Vijayaselvi 2015
    1. Vijayaselvi R, Abraham A, Kumar M, Kuruvilla A, Mathews J, Duley L. Measuring umbilical flow and placental transfusion for preterm births: weighing babies at 33‐36 weeks gestation with cord intact. 1st congress of joint European Neonatal Societies. Budapest, 2015.
Weeks 2013
    1. Weeks AD, Peake M, Yoxall W. The Bedside Assessment, Stabilisation and Initial Cardiorespiratory Support (BASICS) trolley: enabling neonatal resuscitation with an intact cord. RCOG World Congress. Liverpool, 2013.
Weeks 2015
    1. Weeks AD, Watt P, Yoxall CW, Gallagher A, Burleigh A, Bewley S, et al. Innovation in immediate neonatal care: development of the Bedside Assessment, Stabilisation and Initial Cardiorespiratory Support (BASICS) trolley. BMJ Innovations 2015;1:53‐8. - PMC - PubMed
WHO 2014
    1. World Health Organization (WHO). Delayed umbilical cord clamping for improved maternal and infant health and nutrition outcomes. World Health Organization 2014; Vol. Guideline. - PubMed
Wyllie 2015
    1. Wyllie J, Bruinenberg J, Roehr CC, Rudiger M, Trevisanuto D, Urlesberger B. Resuscitation and support of transition of babies at birth. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 7 2015;95:249‐63. - PubMed
Yao 1969
    1. Yao AC, Lind J. Effect of gravity on placental transfusion. Lancet 1969;2(7619):505‐8. - PubMed
Yoxall 2015
    1. Yoxall CW, Ayers S, Sawyer A, Bertullies S, Thomas M, Weeks A, et al. Providing immediate neonatal care and resuscitation at birth beside the mother: clinicians' views, a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2015;5(9):e008494. [DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008494] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Zeitlin 2008
    1. Zeitlin J, Draper ES, Kollee L, Milligan D, Boerch K, Agostino R, et al. Differences in rates and short‐term outcome of live births before 32 weeks of gestation in Europe in 2003: results from the MOSAIC cohort. Pediatrics 2008;121(4):e936‐44. - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Elbourne 1995
    1. Elbourne DR. Early cord clamping in preterm infants. [revised 22 June 1993]. In: Enkin MW, Keirse MJNC, Renfrew MJ, Neilson JP, Crowther C (eds.) Pregnancy and Childbirth Module. In: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Database [database on disk and CDROM]. The Cochrane Collaboration; Issue 2, Oxford: Update Software; 1995.
Rabe 2001
    1. Rabe H, Reynolds GJ. Delayed cord clamping in preterm infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003248] - DOI - PubMed
Rabe 2004
    1. Rabe H, Reynolds GJ, Diaz‐Rosello JL. Early versus delayed umbilical cord clamping in preterm infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003248.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Rabe 2012
    1. Rabe H, Diaz‐Rossello JL, Duley L, Dowswell T. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental transfusion at preterm birth on maternal and infant outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 8. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003248.pub3] - DOI - PubMed

Publication types