Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 24;5(3):e37.
doi: 10.1192/bjo.2019.19.

Patients' experiences of assessment and detention under mental health legislation: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis

Syeda Ferhana Akther  1 , Emma Molyneaux  2 , Ruth Stuart  3 , Sonia Johnson  4 , Alan Simpson  5 , Sian Oram  6
Affiliations

Patients' experiences of assessment and detention under mental health legislation: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis

Syeda Ferhana Akther et al. BJPsych Open. .

Abstract

Background: Understanding patient experiences of detention under mental health legislation is crucial to efforts to reform policy and practice.

Aims: To synthesise qualitative evidence on patients' experiences of assessment and detention under mental health legislation.

Method: Five bibliographic databases were searched, supplemented by reference list screening and citation tracking. Studies were included if they reported on patient experiences of assessment or detention under mental health legislation; reported on patients aged 18 years or older; collected data using qualitative methods; and were reported in peer-reviewed journals. Findings were analysed and synthesised using thematic synthesis.

Results: The review included 56 papers. Themes were generally consistent across studies and related to information and involvement in care, the environment and relationships with staff, as well as the impact of detention on feelings of self-worth and emotional state. The emotional impact of detention and views of its appropriateness varied, but a frequent theme was fear and distress during detention, including in relation to the use of force and restraint. Where staff were perceived as striving to form caring and collaborative relationships with patients despite the coercive nature of treatment, and when clear information was delivered, the negative impact of involuntary care seemed to be reduced.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that involuntary in-patient care is often frightening and distressing, but certain factors were identified that can help reduce negative experiences. Coproduction models may be fruitful in developing new ways of working on in-patient wards that provide more voice to patients and staff, and physical and social environments that are more conducive to recovery.

Declaration of interest: None.

Keywords: Systematic review; involuntary admission; mental health legislation; meta-synthesis; qualitative.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Novella EJ. Mental Health Care in the aftermath of deinstitutionalization: a retrospective and prospective view. Health Care Anal 2010; 18: 222–38. - PubMed
    1. Zhang SM, Mellsop G, Brink J, Wang XP. Involuntary admission and treatment of patients with mental disorder. Neurosci Bull 2015; 31: 99–112. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kallert TW, Glockner M, Schutzwohl M. Involuntary vs. voluntary hospital admission - a systematic literature review on outcome diversity. Eur Arch Psych Clin Neurosci 2008; 258: 195–209. - PubMed
    1. Keown P, Murphy H, McKenna D, McKinnon I. Changes in the use of the Mental Health Act 1983 in England 1984/85 to 2015/16. Br J Psychiatry 2018; 213: 595–9. - PubMed
    1. Wood L, Alsawy S. Patient experiences of psychiatric inpatient care: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. J Psychiatr Intensive Care 2016; 12: 35–43.