Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2019 Sep 17:366:l4923.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4923.

Prediction system for risk of allograft loss in patients receiving kidney transplants: international derivation and validation study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Prediction system for risk of allograft loss in patients receiving kidney transplants: international derivation and validation study

Alexandre Loupy et al. BMJ. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate an integrative system to predict long term kidney allograft failure.

Design: International cohort study.

Setting: Three cohorts including kidney transplant recipients from 10 academic medical centres from Europe and the United States.

Participants: Derivation cohort: 4000 consecutive kidney recipients prospectively recruited in four French centres between 2005 and 2014. Validation cohorts: 2129 kidney recipients from three centres in Europe and 1428 from three centres in North America, recruited between 2002 and 2014. Additional validation in three randomised controlled trials (NCT01079143, EudraCT 2007-003213-13, and NCT01873157).

Main outcome measure: Allograft failure (return to dialysis or pre-emptive retransplantation). 32 candidate prognostic factors for kidney allograft survival were assessed.

Results: Among the 7557 kidney transplant recipients included, 1067 (14.1%) allografts failed after a median post-transplant follow-up time of 7.12 (interquartile range 3.51-8.77) years. In the derivation cohort, eight functional, histological, and immunological prognostic factors were independently associated with allograft failure and were then combined into a risk prediction score (iBox). This score showed accurate calibration and discrimination (C index 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 0.83). The performance of the iBox was also confirmed in the validation cohorts from Europe (C index 0.81, 0.78 to 0.84) and the US (0.80, 0.76 to 0.84). The iBox system showed accuracy when assessed at different times of evaluation post-transplant, was validated in different clinical scenarios including type of immunosuppressive regimen used and response to rejection therapy, and outperformed previous risk prediction scores as well as a risk score based solely on functional parameters including estimated glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria. Finally, the accuracy of the iBox risk score in predicting long term allograft loss was confirmed in the three randomised controlled trials.

Conclusion: An integrative, accurate, and readily implementable risk prediction score for kidney allograft failure has been developed, which shows generalisability across centres worldwide and common clinical scenarios. The iBox risk prediction score may help to guide monitoring of patients and further improve the design and development of a valid and early surrogate endpoint for clinical trials.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03474003.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare: support as detailed above for the submitted work; AL holds shares in Cibiltech, a company that develops software; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Calibration plots at three, five, and seven years of iBox risk scores for validation cohorts: three year (A, B), five year (C, D), and seven year (E, F) predictions. Data are from European validation cohort (A, C, E) and US cohort (B, D, F). Vertical axis is observed proportion of grafts surviving at time of interest. Average predicted probability (predicted survival; x-axis) was plotted against Kaplan-Meier estimate (observed overall survival; y-axis). Black line represents perfectly calibrated model, and blue line represents optimism corrected iBox model

References

    1. Mills KT, Xu Y, Zhang W, et al. A systematic analysis of worldwide population-based data on the global burden of chronic kidney disease in 2010. Kidney Int 2015;88:950-7. 10.1038/ki.2015.230 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hill NR, Fatoba ST, Oke JL, et al. Global Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One 2016;11:e0158765. 10.1371/journal.pone.0158765 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Evans RW, Manninen DL, Garrison LP, Jr, et al. The quality of life of patients with end-stage renal disease. N Engl J Med 1985;312:553-9. 10.1056/NEJM198502283120905 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meier-Kriesche HU, Schold JD, Srinivas TR, Kaplan B. Lack of improvement in renal allograft survival despite a marked decrease in acute rejection rates over the most recent era. Am J Transplant 2004;4:378-83. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00332.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coemans M, Süsal C, Döhler B, et al. Analyses of the short- and long-term graft survival after kidney transplantation in Europe between 1986 and 2015. Kidney Int 2018;94:964-73. 10.1016/j.kint.2018.05.018 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data