Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Aug 20:2019:5961690.
doi: 10.1155/2019/5961690. eCollection 2019.

Extracervical Approaches to Thyroid Surgery: Evolution and Review

Affiliations
Review

Extracervical Approaches to Thyroid Surgery: Evolution and Review

B M Sephton. Minim Invasive Surg. .

Abstract

Over the last two decades, advances and adaptation of technology have led to a variety of endoscopic thyroidectomy procedures being performed. The drive for extracervical procedures has been predominantly influenced by the desire for improved cosmesis via avoidance of visible scars. Extracervical techniques have shown considerable evolution with approaches that have included transaxillary, breast, postauricular, and transoral routes. There has been a varied evidence base for each of these approaches with regard to technical feasibility, safety, patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness. In recent years, robotic-assisted thyroid surgery has gained increased popularity worldwide with the introduction of the da Vinci Robot. Reports of improved postoperative outcomes and patient satisfaction have been in contrast to the financial burden, longer operative time, and increased training required which, to date, have limited widespread application. The aim of this review is to describe the evolution of extracervical procedures including surgical approaches, outcomes, advantages, and disadvantages. Consideration is also given to the future direction of extracervical thyroid surgery with regard to the safety, feasibility, and application of robotic systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Evolution of endoscopic approaches.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Evolution of robotic approaches.

References

    1. Campbell M. J., Duh Q.-Y. Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2014. Defining minimally invasive and remote access surgery of the thyroid and parathyroid glands; pp. 7–16. - DOI
    1. Einarsson J. I., Young A., Tsien L., Sangi-Haghpeykar H. Perceived proficiency in endoscopic techniques among senior obstetrics and gynecology residents. Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. 2002;9(2):158–164. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60124-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beger H., Schwarz A., Bergmann U. Progress in gastrointestinal tract surgery: the impact of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Surgical Endoscopy. 2003;17(2):342–350. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8553-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gagner M. Endoscopic subtotal parathyroidectomy in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. British Journal of Surgery. 1996;83(6):p. 875. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800830656. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hüscher C. S., Chiodini S., Napolitano C., Recher A. Endoscopic right thyroid lobectomy. Surgical Endoscopy. 1997;11(8):p. 877. doi: 10.1007/s004649900476. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources