Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 5;41(1):33.
doi: 10.1186/s40902-019-0216-2. eCollection 2019 Dec.

The preliminary study for three-dimensional alveolar bone morphologic characteristics for alveolar bone restoration

Affiliations

The preliminary study for three-dimensional alveolar bone morphologic characteristics for alveolar bone restoration

Hyun-Jae Cho et al. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. .

Abstract

Background: The concept of the ideal morphology for the alveolar bone form is an important element to reconstruct or restore the in maximizing esthetic profile and functional alveolar bone restoration. The purpose of this preliminary study is to evaluate the normal alveolar bone structure to provide the standard reference and guide template for use in diagnosing for implant placement, determining the correct amount of bone augmentation in actual clinical practice and producing prostheses based on three-dimensional imaging assessment of alveolar bone.

Methods: This study was included 11 men and 11 women (average age, 22.6 and 24.5 years, respectively) selected from among 127 patients. The horizontal widths of alveolar bone of maxilla and mandible were measured at the crestal, mid-root, and root apex level on MDCT (multi-detector computed tomography) images reconstructed by medical imaging software. In addition, tooth dimensions of the central incisors, canines, second premolars, and first molars of maxilla and mandible, including the horizontal width of the interdental alveolar bone crest, were also measured and statistically analyzed.

Results: The horizontal alveolar bone width of the palatal side of maxilla showed a distinct increment from the alveolar bone crest to the apical region in both anterior and posterior areas. The average widths of the maxillary alveolar ridge were as follows: central incisor, 7.43 mm; canine, 8.91 mm; second premolar, 9.57 mm; and first molar, 12.38 mm. The average widths of the mandibular alveolar ridge were as follows: central incisor, 6.21 mm; canine, 8.55 mm; second premolar, 8.45 mm; and first molar, 10.02 mm. In the buccal side, the alveolar bone width was not increased from the crest to the apical region. The horizontal alveolar bone width of an apical and mandibular border region was thinner than at the mid-root level.

Conclusions: The results of the preliminary study are useful as a clinical guideline when determining dental implant diameter and position. And also, these measurements can also be useful during the production of prefabricated membranes and customized alveolar bone scaffolds.

Keywords: Alveolar bone morphology; CT; Dental implant; Guided bone regeneration; Width and length of teeth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Evaluation of the 3D alveolar bone morphology. The concept of this preliminary study is to evaluate the ideal three-dimensional alveolar bone morphology by dividing the single tooth block on 3D reconstruction maxilla and mandible
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Measurement of horizontal width of alveolar bone. a Working on a coronal view of the mandibular first molars. b Working on a coronal view of the maxillary first molars. c Measurement of the horizontal width of the interdental alveolar bone crest (m, d) and the teeth (Tw). d Working on volumetric view on mandibular first molars. d1 = bone width at the crestal level; d2 = bone width at the mid-root level; d3 = bone width at root the apex level; d4 = bone width at the mandibular border level. b, l = buccal and lingual sides; m, d = mesial and distal sides; Tw = width of tooth at the alveolar bone crest level
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparison of horizontal alveolar widths between a maxillary and b mandibular alveolar bone. CI, central incisors; C, canines; PM, premolars; M, molars; d1 = bone width at the crestal level; d2 = bone width at the mid-root level; d3 = bone width at root the apex level; d4 = bone width at the mandibular border level (*P < 0.05)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for dental implants - a Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009;2:167–184. - PubMed
    1. Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral & Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:43–61. - PubMed
    1. Naito T, Hosokawa R, Yokota M. Three-dimensional alveolar bone morphology analysis using computed tomography. J Periodontol. 1998;69:584–589. doi: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.5.584. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fuhrmann RA, Bucker A, Diedrich PR. Assessment of alveolar bone loss with high resolution computed tomography. J Periodont Res. 1995;30:258–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1995.tb02131.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tardieu PB, Vrielinck L, Escolano E. Computer-assisted implant placement. A case report: treatment of the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:599–604. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources