Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911514.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11514.

Prevalence of Screening for Food Insecurity, Housing Instability, Utility Needs, Transportation Needs, and Interpersonal Violence by US Physician Practices and Hospitals

Taressa K Fraze  1 , Amanda L Brewster  2 , Valerie A Lewis  3 , Laura B Beidler  1 , Genevra F Murray  1 , Carrie H Colla  1
Affiliations

Prevalence of Screening for Food Insecurity, Housing Instability, Utility Needs, Transportation Needs, and Interpersonal Violence by US Physician Practices and Hospitals

Taressa K Fraze et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Social needs, including food, housing, utilities, transportation, and experience with interpersonal violence, are linked to health outcomes. Identifying patients with unmet social needs is a necessary first step to addressing these needs, yet little is known about the prevalence of screening.

Objective: To characterize screening for social needs by physician practices and hospitals.

Design, setting, and participants: Cross-sectional survey analyses of responses by physician practices and hospitals to the 2017-2018 National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems. Responses were collected from survey participants from June 16, 2017, to August 17, 2018.

Exposures: Organizational characteristics, including participation in delivery and payment reform.

Main outcomes and measures: Self-report of screening patients for food insecurity, housing instability, utility needs, transportation needs, and experience with interpersonal violence.

Results: Among 4976 physician practices, 2333 responded, a response rate of 46.9%. Among hospitals, 757 of 1628 (46.5%) responded. After eliminating responses because of ineligibility, 2190 physician practices and 739 hospitals remained. Screening for all 5 social needs was reported by 24.4% (95% CI, 20.0%-28.7%) of hospitals and 15.6% (95% CI, 13.4%-17.9%) of practices, whereas 33.3% (95% CI, 30.5%-36.2%) of practices and 8.0% (95% CI, 5.8%-11.0%) of hospitals reported no screening. Screening for interpersonal violence was most common (practices: 56.4%; 95% CI, 53.3%-2 59.4%; hospitals: 75.0%; 95% CI, 70.1%-79.3%), and screening for utility needs was least common (practices: 23.1%; 95% CI, 20.6%-26.0%; hospitals: 35.5%; 95% CI, 30.0%-41.0%) among both hospitals and practices. Among practices, federally qualified health centers (yes: 29.7%; 95% CI, 21.5%-37.8% vs no: 9.4%; 95% CI, 7.2%-11.6%; P < .001), bundled payment participants (yes: 21.4%; 95% CI, 17.1%-25.8% vs no: 10.7%; 95% CI, 7.9%-13.4%; P < .001), primary care improvement models (yes: 19.6%; 95% CI, 16.5%-22.6% vs no: 9.6%; 95% CI, 6.0%-13.1%; P < .001), and Medicaid accountable care organizations (yes: 21.8%; 95% CI, 17.4%-26.2% vs no: 11.2%; 95% CI, 8.6%-13.7%; P < .001) had higher rates of screening for all needs. Practices in Medicaid expansion states (yes: 17.7%; 95% CI, 14.8%-20.7% vs no: 11.4%; 95% CI, 8.1%-14.6%; P = .007) and those with more Medicaid revenue (highest tertile: 17.1%; 95% CI, 11.4%-22.7% vs lowest tertile: 9.0%; 95% CI, 6.1%-11.8%; P = .02) were more likely to screen. Academic medical centers were more likely than other hospitals to screen (49.5%; 95% CI, 34.6%-64.4% vs 23.0%; 95% CI, 18.5%-27.5%; P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance: This study's findings suggest that few US physician practices and hospitals screen patients for all 5 key social needs associated with health outcomes. Practices that serve disadvantaged patients report higher screening rates. The role of physicians and hospitals in meeting patients' social needs is likely to increase as more take on accountability for cost under payment reform. Physicians and hospitals may need additional resources to screen for or address patients' social needs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Drs Fraze, Brewster, Lewis, and Colla reported receiving grants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) during the conduct of the study. Dr Fraze also reported receiving grants from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation during the conduct of the study and receiving grants as an investigator from the 6 Foundation Collaborative, Commonwealth Fund, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Dr Lewis also reported receiving grants from the National Institute on Aging/National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Percentage of Physician Practices and Hospitals That Screen Patients for Each of 5 Social Needs
Number of survey respondents from the 2017-2018 National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems are unweighted. Percentages represent weighted data; error bars, 95% CIs.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Percentage of Physician Practices and Hospitals That Screen Patients for Food Insecurity, Housing Instability, Utility Needs, Transportation Needs, and Experience With Interpersonal Violence, by Number of Needs Screened
Number of survey respondents from the 2017-2018 National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems are unweighted. Percentages represent weighted data; error bars, 95% CIs.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Castrucci B, Auerbach J. Meeting individual social needs falls short of addressing social determinants of health. Health Affairs Blog. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20190115.234942/full/. Published January 16, 2019. Accessed August 13, 2019. - DOI
    1. Hood CM, Gennuso KP, Swain GR, Catlin BB. County health rankings: relationships between determinant factors and health outcomes. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50(2):-. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.024 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Solomon LS, Kanter MH. Health care steps up to social determinants of health: current context. Perm J. 2018;22:18-139. doi: 10.7812/TPP/18-139 - DOI
    1. Goddu AP, Roberson TS, Raffel KE, Chin MH, Peek ME. Food Rx: a community-university partnership to prescribe healthy eating on the South Side of Chicago. J Prev Interv Community. 2015;43(2):148-162. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2014.973251 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hostetter M, Klein S, McCarthy D Hennepin Health: a care delivery paradigm for new Medicaid beneficiaries. The Commonwealth Fund website. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/case-study/2016/oct/hennep.... Published October 7, 2016. Accessed May 3, 2019.

Publication types

MeSH terms