Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jan;50(1):12-20.
doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01878-7. Epub 2019 Sep 18.

Recent progress in multidisciplinary treatment for patients with esophageal cancer

Affiliations
Review

Recent progress in multidisciplinary treatment for patients with esophageal cancer

Masayuki Watanabe et al. Surg Today. 2020 Jan.

Erratum in

Abstract

Esophageal cancer is one of the most aggressive gastrointestinal cancers. This review focuses on eight topics within the multidisciplinary approach for esophageal cancer. As esophagectomy is highly invasive and likely to impair quality of life, the development of less invasive strategies is expected. Endoscopic resection (ER) of early esophageal cancer is a less invasive treatment for early esophageal cancer. A recent phase II trial revealed that combined ER and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is efficacious as an esophagus-preserving treatment for cT1bN0 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Esophagectomy and definitive CRT are equally effective for patients with clinical stage I SCC in terms of long-term outcome. For locally advanced resectable cancers, multidisciplinary treatment strategies have been established through several clinical trials of neoadjuvant or perioperative treatment. Minimally invasive esophagectomy may improve the outcomes of patients and CRT is a curative-intent alternative to esophagectomy. CRT with 50.4 Gy radiotherapy combined with salvage surgery is a promising option to preserve the esophagus. Induction chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy may improve the outcomes of patients with locally advanced unresectable tumors. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective for esophageal cancer, and their introduction to clinical practice is awaited.

Keywords: Chemoradiotherapy; Esophageal cancer; Esophagectomy; Multidisciplinary treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Pennathur A, Gibson MK, Jobe BA, Luketich JD. Oesophageal carcinoma. Lancet. 2013;381:400–412. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60643-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Center of Cancer Control and Information Services NCC. Cancer Statistics in Japan, Cancer Information Service. 2019. https://ganjoho.jp/en/professional/statistics/table_download.html. Accessed 10 Aug.
    1. Huang F-L, Yu S-J. Esophageal cancer: risk factors, genetic association, and treatment. Asian J Surg. 2018;41:210–215. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.10.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Watanabe M. Recent topics and perspectives on esophageal cancer in Japan. JMA J. 2018;1:30–39. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2018-0002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, Kitagawa Y, Baba H, Kimura W, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg. 2014;260:259–266. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000644. - DOI - PubMed