Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 18;9(1):91.
doi: 10.1186/s13550-019-0561-2.

Voxel-based statistical analysis and quantification of amyloid PET in the Japanese Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (J-ADNI) multi-center study

Affiliations

Voxel-based statistical analysis and quantification of amyloid PET in the Japanese Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (J-ADNI) multi-center study

Go Akamatsu et al. EJNMMI Res. .

Abstract

Background: Amyloid PET plays a vital role in detecting the accumulation of in vivo amyloid-β (Aβ). The quantification of Aβ accumulation has been widely performed using the region of interest (ROI)-based mean cortical standardized uptake value ratio (mcSUVR). However, voxel-based statistical analysis has not been well studied. The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of analyzing amyloid PET scans by voxel-based statistical analysis. The results were then compared to those with the ROI-based mcSUVR. In total, 166 subjects who underwent 11C-PiB PET in the J-ADNI multi-center study were analyzed. Additionally, 18 Aβ-negative images were collected from other studies to form a normal database. The PET images were spatially normalized to the standard space using an adaptive template method without MRI. The mcSUVR was measured using a pre-defined ROI. Voxel-wise Z-scores within the ROI were calculated using the normal database, after which Z-score maps were generated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate whether Z-sum (sum of the Z-score) and mcSUVR could be used to classify the scans into positive and negative using the central visual read as the reference standard. PET scans that were equivocal were regarded as positive.

Results: Sensitivity and specificity were respectively 90.8% and 100% by Z-sum and 91.8% and 98.5% by mcSUVR. Most of the equivocal scans were subsequently classified by both Z-sum and mcSUVR as false negatives. Z-score maps correctly delineated abnormal Aβ accumulation over the same regions as the visual read.

Conclusions: We examined the usefulness of voxel-based statistical analysis for amyloid PET. This method provides objective Z-score maps and Z-sum values, which were observed to be helpful as an adjunct to visual interpretation especially for cases with mild or limited Aβ accumulation. This approach could improve the Aβ detection sensitivity, reduce inter-reader variability, and allow for detailed monitoring of Aβ deposition.

Trial registration: The number of the J-ADNI study is UMIN000001374.

Keywords: 11C-PiB; Amyloid; PET; Voxel-based statistical analysis; Z-score.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Yasuhiko Ikari is an employee of CMIC Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan. Hiroyuki Nishida is an employee of Micron, Inc., Tokyo, Japan. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Eighteen cases of Aβ-negative 11C-PiB PET images used to create the normal database. The clinical diagnosis of each case is described in the upper left
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The empirical PiB-prone (EPP) ROI template
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Average (left) and standard deviation (SD) (right) maps created as the normal database. The SD map has been masked by the empirical PiB-prone (EPP) region of interest template
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The workflow of the voxel-based statistical analysis
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Representative positive and negative cases and their Z-score maps depicted in MNI space
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
mcSUVR and Z-sum values for positive, equivocal, and negative groups (a, b) as well as those for normal control, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease groups (c, d)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
PET images and Z-score maps in MNI space, and the three physicians’ visual read and consensus comments for three representative cases, in which official consensus interpretation was “equivocal.” There are the cases in which three physicians' visual read matched (a) or did not match (b and c). The Z-score maps correctly delineated abnormal Aβ accumulation over the same regions as the visual read (red arrows). F, L, Pa, Po, and S are frontal lobe, lateral temporal lobe, lateral parietal lobe, posterior cingulate gyrus and precuneus, and striatum, respectively. Class., Nega., Posi., and Equiv. are classification, negative, positive, and equivocal, respectively. The circle and triangle represent the positive and equivocal region, as judged by the physicians

References

    1. Bateman RJ, Xiong C, Benzinger TL, Fagan AM, Goate A, Fox NC, et al. Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:795–804. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1202753. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Klunk WE, Engler H, Nordberg A, Wang Y, Blomqvist G, Holt DP, et al. Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease with Pittsburgh Compound-B. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:306–319. doi: 10.1002/ana.20009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frisoni GB, Bocchetta M, Chetelat G, Rabinovici GD, de Leon MJ, Kaye J, et al. Imaging markers for Alzheimer disease: which vs how. Neurology. 2013;81:487–500. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31829d86e8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Minoshima S, Drzezga AE, Barthel H, Bohnen N, Djekidel M, Lewis DH, et al. SNMMI procedure standard/EANM practice guideline for amyloid PET imaging of the brain 1.0. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1316–1322. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.174615. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johnson KA, Minoshima S, Bohnen NI, Donohoe KJ, Foster NL, Herscovitch P, et al. Appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET: a report of the Amyloid Imaging Task Force, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and the Alzheimer’s Association. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:476–490. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.120618. - DOI - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources