Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 20;68(37):801-806.
doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6837a2.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Among Men Who Have Sex with Men - 23 Urban Areas, 2017

Collaborators, Affiliations

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Among Men Who Have Sex with Men - 23 Urban Areas, 2017

Dafna Kanny et al. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. .

Abstract

In 2017, preliminary data show that gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) accounted for 67% of new diagnoses of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, that MSM who inject drugs accounted for an additional 3%, and that African American/black (black) and Hispanic/Latino (Hispanic) MSM were disproportionately affected (1). During 2010-2015, racial/ethnic disparities in HIV incidence increased among MSM; in 2015, rates among black and Hispanic MSM were 10.5 and 4.9 times as high, respectively, as the rate among white MSM (compared with 9.2 and 3.8 times as high, respectively, in 2010) (2). Increased use of preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), which reduces the risk for sexual acquisition of HIV infection by approximately 99% when taken daily as prescribed,* would help to reduce these disparities and support the Ending the HIV Epidemic: A Plan for America initiative (3). Although PrEP use has increased among all MSM since 2014 (4), racial/ethnic disparities in PrEP use could increase existing disparities in HIV incidence among MSM (5). To understand racial/ethnic disparities in PrEP awareness, discussion with a health care provider, and use (steps in the HIV PrEP continuum of care) (6), CDC analyzed 2017 National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS) data. Black and Hispanic MSM were significantly less likely than were white MSM to be aware of PrEP, to have discussed PrEP with a health care provider, or to have used PrEP within the past year. Among those who had discussed PrEP with a health care provider within the past year, 68% of white MSM, 62% of Hispanic MSM, and 55% of black MSM, reported PrEP use. Prevention efforts need to increase PrEP use among all MSM and target eliminating racial/ethnic disparities in PrEP use.§.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Figures

FIGURE
FIGURE
Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) awareness, discussion, and use, by race/ethnicity, among men who have sex with men (MSM) with a likely indication for PrEP use (N = 4,056) — 23 urban areas, 2017 Abbreviations: HIV = human immunodeficiency virus; NHBS = National HIV Behavioral Surveillance. * Respondents with a negative NHBS HIV test result were asked “Preexposure prophylaxis, or PrEP, is an antiretroviral medicine, such as Truvada, taken for months or years by a person who is HIV-negative to reduce the risk of getting HIV. Before today, have you ever heard of PrEP?” If respondent had heard of PrEP before today, he was asked “In the past 12 months, have you had a discussion with a health care provider about taking PrEP?” § If respondent had heard of PrEP before today, he was asked “In the past 12 months, have you taken PrEP to reduce the risk of getting HIV?” Men with a likely indication for PrEP included those who had 1) a negative NHBS HIV test result following the NHBS interview; 2) either multiple male sex partners or any male sex partner with HIV infection within the past year; and 3) either condomless anal sex or a bacterial sexually transmitted infection within the past year.

References

    1. CDC. Diagnoses of HIV infection in the United States and dependent areas, 2017. HIV surveillance report, vol. 29. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-surveil...
    1. McCree DH, Williams AM, Chesson HW, et al. Changes in disparities in estimated HIV incidence rates among black, Hispanic/Latino, and white men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States, 2010–2015. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2019;81:57–62. 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001977 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fauci AS, Redfield RR, Sigounas G, Weahkee MD, Giroir BP. Ending the HIV epidemic: a plan for the United States. JAMA 2019;321:844–5. 10.1001/jama.2019.1343 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Finlayson T, Cha S, Xia M, et al.; National HIV Behavioral Surveillance Study Group. Changes in HIV preexposure prophylaxis awareness and use among men who have sex with men—20 urban areas, 2014 and 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019;68:597–603. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6827a1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goedel WC, King MRF, Lurie MN, Nunn AS, Chan PA, Marshall BDL. Effect of racial inequities in pre-exposure prophylaxis use on racial disparities in HIV incidence among men who have sex with men: a modeling study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2018;79:323–9. 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001817 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms