Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 13:377:112236.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112236. Epub 2019 Sep 16.

The amygdala differentially regulates defensive behaviors evoked by CO2

Affiliations

The amygdala differentially regulates defensive behaviors evoked by CO2

R J Taugher et al. Behav Brain Res. .

Abstract

CO2 inhalation can provoke panic attacks in humans, and the likelihood is increased in patients with panic disorder. Identifying brain sites involved could provide important mechanistic insight into the illness. In mice, the amygdala has been suggested to promote CO2 responses; however, recent studies in humans with amygdala damage indicate the amygdala is not required for CO2-induced fear and panic and might actually oppose these responses. To clarify the role of the amygdala, we produced lesions in mice paralleling the human lesions, and characterized behavioral responses to CO2. Compared to sham controls, we found that amygdala-lesioned mice froze less to 10% CO2, and unlike shams they also began to jump frenetically. At 20% CO2, controls also exhibited jumping, suggesting it is a normal response to more extreme CO2 concentrations. The effect of amygdala lesions was specific to CO2 as amygdala-lesioned mice did not jump in response to a predator odor or to an auditory conditioned stimulus. In amygdala-lesioned mice, jumping evoked by 10% CO2 was eliminated by co-lesioning the dorsal periaqueductal gray, a structure implicated in panic and escape-related behaviors. Together, these observations suggest a dual role for the amygdala in the CO2 response: promoting CO2-induced freezing, and opposing CO2-induced jumping, which may help explain the exaggerated CO2 responses in humans with amygdala lesions.

Keywords: Amygdala; Carbon dioxide; Panic; Periacqueductal gray.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Amygdala lesions alter CO2-evoked behaviors.
A) Diagram [58] showing size and location of the largest (red) and smallest (blue) amygdala lesions. B) Amygdala lesions reduce CO2-evoked freezing. ANOVA revealed an interaction between CO2 concentration and lesion status (F(2,57) = 7.382, p = 0.0014, n = 15, 7, 18, 10, 6, 6). Planned contrast testing revealed that amygdala lesions reduce freezing to both 10% (***p = 0.0004) and 20% CO2 (*p = 0.0481). C) Amygdala lesions elicit 10% CO2-evoked jumping. ANOVA revealed an interaction between CO2 concentration and lesion status (F(2,57) = 5.248, p = 0.0081. Planned contrast testing revealed that mice with amygdala lesions exhibit increased jumping in response to 10% (***p < 0.0001) but not 20% (p = 0.9709) CO2, and that sham controls jumped more in response to 20% CO2 than 10% CO2 (p = 0.0066).
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Amygdala-lesioned mice do not jump to an auditory conditioned stimulus or a predator odor.
A) Amygdala lesions greatly attenuate conditioned freezing to a tone that had been previously paired with footshocks (t(34) = 5.676, ***p < 0.0001, n = 18/group). However, exposure to this tone does not elicit jumping (p > 0.9999). B) Amygdala lesions do not alter freezing in response to the predator odor TMT (t(11) = 0.3492, p = 0.7336, n = 6, 7), nor do they elicit jumping.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:. BNST and hippocampus lesions do not elicit 10% CO2-evoked jumping.
A) As previously reported [14], BNST lesions reduce 10% CO2-evoked freezing. However, BNST lesions do not elicit 10% CO2-evoked jumping. ANOVA revealed an interaction between CO2 concentration and lesion status (F(1,49) = 7.56, p = 0.0083, n = 15, 9, 18, 11). Planned contrast testing revealed that BNST-lesioned mice freeze less than sham-lesioned mice in 10% CO2 (**p = 0.0032). However, ANOVA revealed no effect of CO2 concentration on jumping (F(1,49) = 1.4, p = 0.2425), no effect of lesion (F(1,49) = 2.797, p = 0.1008), and no interaction (F(1,49) = 1.4, p = 0.2425). B) Hippocampus lesions do not alter 10% CO2-evoked freezing behavior or elicit 10% CO2-evoked jumping. ANOVA revealed an effect of CO2 concentration on freezing (F(1,43) = 253.2, p < 0.0001, n = 15, 7, 18, 7), but no effect of lesion (F(1,43) = 0.0439, p = 0.8350), and no interaction (F(1,43) = 0.5889, p = 0.5889). ANOVA revealed no effect of CO2 on jumping (F(1,43) = 3.14, p = 0.0835), no effect of lesion (F(1,43) = 0.004056, p = 9495), and no interaction (F(1,43) = 0.06299, p = 0.8030).
Figure 4:
Figure 4:. dPAG lesions reduce jumping behavior in amygdala-lesioned mice.
10% CO2-evoked behavior of mice with both amygdala and dPAG lesions was compared to that of sham controls and mice with only amygdala lesions (from Figure 1). A) ANOVA revealed a difference in freezing among groups (F(2,35) = 11.35, p = 0.0002, n = 18, 10, 10). Planned contrast testing revealed that freezing in mice with both amygdala and dPAG lesions was less than in sham controls (***p = 0.0005) and similar to mice with only amygdala lesions (p = 0.3445). B) ANOVA revealed a difference in jumping among groups (F(2,35) = 30.00, p < 0.0001). dPAG lesions greatly attenuated the CO2-evoked jumping seen in amygdala-lesioned mice (***p = 0.0005) and mice with both amygdala and dPAG lesions exhibited similar jumping as sham controls (p = 0.6950).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blanchard DC, Griebel G, Pobbe R, Blanchard RJ, Risk assessment as an evolved threat detection and analysis process, Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35(4) (2011) 991–8. - PubMed
    1. Perusini JN, Fanselow MS, Neurobehavioral perspectives on the distinction between fear and anxiety, Learn Mem 22(9) (2015) 417–25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harrison LA, Ahn C, Adolphs R, Exploring the Structure of Human Defensive Responses from Judgments of Threat Scenarios, PLoS One 10(8) (2015) e0133682. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eilam D, Die hard: a blend of freezing and fleeing as a dynamic defense--implications for the control of defensive behavior, Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29(8) (2005) 1181–91. - PubMed
    1. Dielenberg RA, McGregor IS, Defensive behavior in rats towards predatory odors: a review, Neurosci Biobehav Rev 25(7–8) (2001) 597–609. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms