Surgical decision making for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: evidence-based approach
- PMID: 31538073
- PMCID: PMC6737063
- DOI: 10.5468/ogs.2019.62.5.307
Surgical decision making for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: evidence-based approach
Abstract
Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP), and a variety of procedures can be performed to correct POP. When deciding on the proper surgical procedure, the surgeon must take into consideration the individual patient's risk for surgical complication and prolapse recurrence and her preference. This review will discuss the key issues faced in the surgical decision-making process for POP and recommendations based on the current scientific evidence.
Keywords: Decision making; Pelvic organ prolapse; Surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
References
-
- Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501–506. - PubMed
-
- Smith FJ, Holman CD, Moorin RE, Tsokos N. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:1096–1100. - PubMed
-
- Løwenstein E, Ottesen B, Gimbel H. Incidence and lifetime risk of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Denmark from 1977 to 2009. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2015;26:49–55. - PubMed
-
- Rooney K, Kenton K, Mueller ER, FitzGerald MP, Brubaker L. Advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse is highly correlated with apical prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:1837–1840. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
