Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct;25(10):1919-1927.
doi: 10.3201/eid2510.181875.

Early Diagnosis of Tularemia by Flow Cytometry, Czech Republic, 2003-20151

Early Diagnosis of Tularemia by Flow Cytometry, Czech Republic, 2003-20151

Aleš Chrdle et al. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

We retrospectively assessed the utility of a flow cytometry-based test quantifying the percentage of CD3+ T cells with the CD4-/CD8- phenotype for predicting tularemia diagnoses in 64 probable and confirmed tularemia patients treated during 2003-2015 and 342 controls with tularemia-like illnesses treated during 2012-2015 in the Czech Republic. The median percentage of CD3+/CD4-/CD8- T cells in peripheral blood was higher in tularemia patients (19%, 95% CI 17%-22%) than in controls (3%, 95% CI 2%-3%). When we used 8% as the cutoff, this test's sensitivity was 0.953 and specificity 0.895 for distinguishing cases from controls. The CD3+/CD4-/CD8- T cells increased a median of 7 days before tularemia serologic test results became positive. This test supports early presumptive diagnosis of tularemia for clinically suspected cases 7-14 days before diagnosis can be confirmed by serologic testing in regions with low prevalences of tularemia-like illnesses.

Keywords: Czech Republic; Francisella tularensis; ROC curve; T cells; bacteria; diagnosis; double-negative T cells; early diagnosis; flow cytometry; gamma delta T cells; intracellular pathogens; peripheral blood; tularemia; work-up; γδ T cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow cytometry gating strategy used to determine percentage of CD3+ lymphocytes that are CD3+/CD4–/CD8– T cells and γδ T cells in peripheral blood samples acquired from patients with suspected tularemia, Czech Republic, 2003–2015. A–C) Staining with CYTO-STAT tetraCHROME CD45-FITC/CD56-RD1 (phycoerythrin)/CD19-ECD/CD3-PC5, anti–CD4-Alexa Fluor 750, and anti–CD8-PC7 (Beckman Coulter, https://www.beckmancoulter.com). A) CD45 versus side scatter plot. Percentages of lymphocytes (red), monocytes (green), and granulocytes (blue) are indicated. In total, 3,000 lymphocytes were selected for further analysis. B) B cells (blue) and T cells (red) plotted according to their CD19 and CD3 expression. Percentages of cells within each quadrant are indicated. T cells were selected for further analysis. C) Percentage of CD3+ T cells not displaying CD4 and CD8 (CD4–/CD8–) determined with CD4 versus CD8 plots. Percentages of cells within each quadrant are indicated. D) Staining with anti–CD3-FITC and anti–T-cell receptor PAN γδ-PE (Beckman Coulter). After a side scatter and forward scatter plot (not shown), the percentage of lymphocytes that were CD3+/γδ T cells (green) were determined with a CD3 versus T-cell receptor pan–γδ plot. Percentages of cells within each quadrant are indicated. Flow cytometry was performed in the Immunology Laboratory of České Budějovice Hospital (České Budějovice, Czech Republic). ECD, phycoerythrin-Texas Red-X; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; PC, phycoerythrin cyanine; PE, phycoerythrin.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Selection of tularemia cases (2003–2015) and controls (2012–2015) in investigation of whether γδ T cells or CD3+/CD4–/CD8– T cells can be used for early presumptive tularemia diagnosis, Czech Republic.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Correlation between percentage of CD3+ lymphocytes that are γδ T cells and percentage that are CD3+/CD4–/CD8– T cells in peripheral blood samples from patients with confirmed or probable tularemia diagnoses (n = 48), Czech Republic, 2003–2015. The Spearman correlation coefficient of this plot (0.830, 95% CI 0.679–0.906; p<0.0001) indicates a strong correlation and suggests that these T cells can be used interchangeably for tularemia diagnosis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Percentage of CD3+ lymphocytes that are γδ T cells and CD3+/CD4–/CD8– T cells in peripheral blood samples from patients with confirmed or probable tularemia by clinical manifestation, Czech Republic, 2003–2015. The percentage of γδ T cells was determined for 48 cases and percentage of CD3+/CD4–/CD8– T cells for 64 cases. Paired comparisons (Kruskal-Wallis test) reveal no significant differences except for glandular versus typhoidal in γδ (p = 0.037) and CD3+/CD4/CD8– T cells (p = 0.041). Boxes indicate interquartile ranges (IQRs), horizontal lines within boxes indicate medians, whiskers indicate range values <1.5× the IQR limits, and circles indicate outliers (i.e., values >1.5× the IQR limits).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of percentages of CD3+ lymphocytes with CD4–/CD8– phenotype in peripheral blood samples from patients with probable or confirmed tularemia cases (n = 64, 2003–2015) and controls (n = 342, 2012–2015), Czech Republic. Boxes indicate interquartile ranges (IQRs), horizontal lines within boxes indicate medians, whiskers indicate range values <1.5× the IQR limits, and circles indicate outliers (i.e., values >1.5× times the IQR limits). The percentage of CD3+/CD4–/CD8– T cells is significantly higher in cases than controls (Mann-Whitney U test, p<0.0001).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Receiver operating characteristic curve for diagnostic utility of raised CD3+/CD4–/CD8– T cells distinguishing probable and confirmed tularemia cases (n = 64, 2003–2015) from controls (n = 342, 2012–2015), Czech Republic. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve is 0.970 (95% CI 0.952–0.988). The Youden index (circle on curve) is the maximal vertical distance (dashed line) of the curve from the diagonal line.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Comparison of time to first positive serologic test result for tularemia and time to raised CD3+/CD4–/CD8– T-cell percentage determined by flow cytometry relative to the time of symptom onset of 58 patients with probable or confirmed tularemia, Czech Republic, 2003–2015. Percentages of CD3+/CD4–/CD8– T cells >8% were considered raised. A positive serologic test result for tularemia was defined for probable cases as an antibody titer of >1:20 in any acute phase blood sample and for confirmed cases as a single antibody titer of >1:160 in any blood sample or a seroconversion from negative to positive (any titer) or a 4-fold increase in titer between acute and convalescent patient samples (agglutination test; Tularemia Diagnostic Set, Bioveta a.s., https://www.bioveta.eu). Boxes indicate interquartile ranges (IQRs), horizontal lines within boxes indicate medians, whiskers indicate range values <1.5× the IQR limits, and circles indicate outliers (i.e., values >1.5× times the IQR limits). The CD3+/CD4–/CD8– T cells increased before Francisella tularensis–specific antibody titers increased (Wilcoxon signed rank test, p<0.0001).

References

    1. McCoy GW, Chapin CW. Further observations on a plague-like disease of rodents with a preliminary note on the causative agent, Bacterium tularense. J Infect Dis. 1912;10:61–72. 10.1093/infdis/10.1.61 - DOI
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Tularaemia-annual epidemiological report 2016. 2019. Jan 22 [cited 2018 Dec 7]. https://ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/documents/AER_for_2016-tularae...
    1. Sjöstedt A. Tularemia: history, epidemiology, pathogen physiology, and clinical manifestations. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1105:1–29. 10.1196/annals.1409.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maurin M, Gyuranecz M. Tularaemia: clinical aspects in Europe. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:113–24. 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00355-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yapar D, Erenler AK, Terzi Ö, Akdoğan Ö, Ece Y, Baykam N. Predicting tularemia with clinical, laboratory and demographical findings in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34:218–21. 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.034 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms