Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Sep 18;55(9):602.
doi: 10.3390/medicina55090602.

The Controversial History of Hormone Replacement Therapy

Affiliations
Review

The Controversial History of Hormone Replacement Therapy

Angelo Cagnacci et al. Medicina (Kaunas). .

Abstract

The history of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) started in the 1960s, with very high popularity in the 1990s. The first clinical trials on HRT and chronic postmenopausal conditions were started in the USA in the late 1990s. After the announcement of the first results of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) in 2002, which showed that HRT had more detrimental than beneficial effects, HRT use dropped. The negative results of the study received wide publicity, creating panic among some users and new guidance for doctors on prescribing HRT. The clear message from the media was that HRT had more risks than benefits for all women. In the following years, a reanalysis of the WHI trial was performed, and new studies showed that the use of HRT in younger women or in early postmenopausal women had a beneficial effect on the cardiovascular system, reducing coronary disease and all-cause mortality. Notwithstanding this, the public opinion on HRT has not changed yet, leading to important negative consequences for women's health and quality of life.

Keywords: breast cancer; cardiovascular disease; hormone replacement therapy; osteoporosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors report any conflict of interest with the data and concepts expressed in the present manuscript. No author has a conflict of interest that is relevant to the subject matter or materials included in this work.

References

    1. Keep P.A., Kellerhals J. The ageing woman. In: Lauritzen C., van Keep P.A., editors. Ageing and Estrogens. Frontiers of Hormone Research, Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Estrogen Therapy, Geneva, Switzerland, 1972. Volume 2. S. Karger; Basel, Switzerland: 1973. pp. 160–173. - DOI
    1. Kling J. The Strange Case of Premarin Modern Drug Discovery. [(accessed on 22 July 2019)];2000 Available online: http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/archive/mdd/v03/i08/html/kling.html.
    1. Wilson R.A. In: In Feminine Forever. Evans M., editor. Lippincott & Co.; Philadelphia, PA, USA: 1996.
    1. Ziel H.K., Finkle W.D. Increased risk on endometrial carcinoma among users of conjugated estrogens. N. Engl. J. Med. 1975;293:1167–1170. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197512042932303. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith D.C., Prentice R., Thomson D.J., Herrmann W.L. Association of exogenous estrogen and endogenous carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 1975;293:1164–1167. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197512042932302. - DOI - PubMed