Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Jun;182(6):1369-1378.
doi: 10.1111/bjd.18552. Epub 2019 Dec 8.

Long-term efficacy and safety of sonidegib in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma: 42-month analysis of the phase II randomized, double-blind BOLT study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Long-term efficacy and safety of sonidegib in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma: 42-month analysis of the phase II randomized, double-blind BOLT study

R Dummer et al. Br J Dermatol. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) exhibit aberrant activation of the hedgehog pathway. Sonidegib is a hedgehog pathway inhibitor approved for the treatment of locally advanced BCC (laBCC) and metastatic BCC (mBCC) based on primary results of the BOLT study [Basal Cell Carcinoma Outcomes with LDE225 (sonidegib) Treatment].

Objectives: This is the final 42-month analysis of the BOLT study, evaluating the efficacy and safety of sonidegib.

Methods: Adults with no prior hedgehog pathway inhibitor therapy were randomized in a 1 : 2 ratio to sonidegib 200 mg or 800 mg once daily. Treatment continued for up to 42 months or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, study termination or withdrawal of consent. The primary efficacy end point was the objective response rate (ORR) by central review, assessed at baseline; weeks 5, 9 and 17; then subsequently every 8 or 12 weeks during years 1 or 2, respectively. Safety end points included adverse event monitoring and reporting.

Results: The study enrolled 230 patients, 79 and 151 in the 200-mg and 800-mg groups, respectively, of whom 8% and 3.3% remained on treatment by the 42-month cutoff, respectively. The ORRs by central review were 56% [95% confidence interval (CI) 43-68] for laBCC and 8% (95% CI 0·2-36) for mBCC in the 200-mg group and 46·1% (95% CI 37·2-55·1) for laBCC and 17% (95% CI 5-39) for mBCC in the 800-mg group. No new safety concerns emerged.

Conclusions: Sonidegib demonstrated sustained efficacy and a manageable safety profile. The final BOLT results support sonidegib as a viable treatment option for laBCC and mBCC. What's already known about this topic? Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is usually treatable with surgery or radiation therapy, but there are limited treatment options for patients with advanced BCC. Sonidegib, a hedgehog pathway inhibitor approved for the treatment of advanced BCC, demonstrated clinically relevant efficacy and manageable safety in prior analyses of the phase II randomized, double-blind BOLT study [Basal Cell Carcinoma Outcomes with LDE225 (sonidegib) Treatment]. What does this study add? This final 42-month analysis of BOLT is the longest follow-up available for a hedgehog pathway inhibitor. Clinically relevant efficacy results were sustained from prior analyses, with objective response rates by central review of the approved 200-mg daily dose of 56% in locally advanced BCC and 8% in metastatic BCC. No new safety concerns were raised. The results confirmed sonidegib as a viable long-term treatment option for patients with advanced BCC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Design of the BOLT study – Basal Cell Carcinoma Outcomes with LDE225 (sonidegib) Treatment. aPatients previously treated with sonidegib or other hedgehog pathway inhibitors were excluded. bStratification was based on stage, disease histology for patients with laBCC (nonaggressive vs. aggressive) and geographical region. cTreatment was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, study termination or withdrawal of consent. AE, adverse event; BCC, basal cell carcinoma; CR, complete response; DOR, duration of response; laBCC, locally advanced BCC; mBCC, metastatic BCC; mRECIST, modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression‐free survival; Q8W, every 8 weeks; Q12W, every 12 weeks; TTR, time to tumour response.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient disposition. aOne patient randomized to sonidegib 800 mg did not receive treatment. ITT, intent to treat.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Objective response rates by central review across all BOLT (Basal Cell Carcinoma Outcomes with LDE225 Treatment) analyses in patients receiving sonidegib 200 mg daily.17, 19, 20 Results are for the intent‐to‐treat population. BCC, basal cell carcinoma; laBCC, locally advanced BCC; mBCC, metastatic BCC; ORR, objective response rate.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan–Meier plots of duration of response per central review in patients receiving sonidegib 200 mg daily (responders only). BCC, basal cell carcinoma; laBCC, locally advanced BCC; mBCC, metastatic BCC; mo, months.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Duration of response by central review in patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma receiving sonidegib 200 mg. Results are for the intent‐to‐treat population. CI, confidence interval.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Adverse events in ≥ 20% of patients treated with sonidegib 200 mg and 800 mg daily CK, creatine kinase.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Asgari MM, Moffet HH, Ray GT, Quesenberry CP. Trends in basal cell carcinoma incidence and identification of high‐risk subgroups, 1998–2012. JAMA Dermatol 2015; 151:976–81. - PubMed
    1. Xiang F, Lucas R, Hales S, Neale R. Incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer in relation to ambient UV radiation in white populations, 1978–2012: empirical relationships. JAMA Dermatol 2014; 150:1063–71. - PubMed
    1. Kim JYS, Kozlow JH, Mittal B et al Guidelines of care for the management of basal cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2018; 78:540–59. - PubMed
    1. Amici JM, Battistella M, Beylot‐Barry M et al Defining and recognising locally advanced basal cell carcinoma. Eur J Dermatol 2015; 25:586–94. - PubMed
    1. Lear JT, Corner C, Dziewulski P et al Challenges and new horizons in the management of advanced basal cell carcinoma: a UK perspective. Br J Cancer 2014; 111:1476–81. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types