Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Sep 23;14(9):e0222386.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222386. eCollection 2019.

Effects of the Best Possible Self intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Alba Carrillo  1 , María Rubio-Aparicio  2 , Guadalupe Molinari  3   4 , Ángel Enrique  5 , Julio Sánchez-Meca  6 , Rosa M Baños  1   4
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effects of the Best Possible Self intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Alba Carrillo et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The Best Possible Self (BPS) exercise promotes a positive view of oneself in the best possible future, after working hard towards it. Since the first work that attempted to examine the benefits of this intervention in 2001, studies on the BPS have grown exponentially and, currently, this is one of the most widely used Positive Psychology Interventions. However, little is yet known about its overall effectiveness in increasing wellbeing outcomes. Thus, the aim of this meta-analysis is to shed light on this question. A systematic literature search was conducted, and 29 studies (in 26 articles) met the inclusion criteria of empirically testing the intervention and comparing it to a control condition. In addition, BPS was compared to gratitude interventions in some of the included studies. A total of 2,909 participants were involved in the analyses. The outcome measures were wellbeing, optimism, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. Results showed that the BPS is an effective intervention to improve wellbeing (d+ = .325), optimism (d+ = .334) and positive affect (d+ = .511) comparing to controls. Small effect sizes were obtained for negative affect and depressive symptoms. Moderator analyses did not show statistically significant results for wellbeing, except for a trend towards significance in the age of the participants (years) and the magnitude of the intervention (total minutes of practice). In addition, the BPS was found to be more beneficial for positive and negative affect than gratitude interventions (d+ = .326 and d+ = .485, respectively). These results indicate that the BPS can be considered a valuable Positive Psychology Intervention to improve clients' wellbeing, and it seems that it might be more effective for older participants and with shorter practices (measured as total minutes of practice).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow diagram.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Forest plot displaying the effect sizes (and 95% confidence intervals) for wellbeing.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Funnel plot of the 29 standardized mean change difference indices for wellbeing.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Seligman MEP, Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive Psychology: An Introduction. Am Psychol. 2000;55: 5–14. 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sin NL, Lyubomirsky S. Enhancing Well-Being and Alleviating Depressive Symptoms With Positive Psychology Interventions: A Practice-Friendly Meta-Analysis. J Clin Psychol. 2009;65: 467–487. 10.1002/jclp.20593 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bolier L, Haverman M, Westerhof GJ, Riper H, Smit F, Bohlmeijer E. Positive psychology interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Public Health. 2013;13: 1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1988.
    1. King LA. The health benefits of writing about life goals. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2001;27: 798–807.

Publication types