Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Oct;84(10):2705-2718.
doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.14705. Epub 2019 Sep 23.

International Survey of Food Fraud and Related Terminology: Preliminary Results and Discussion

Affiliations
Review

International Survey of Food Fraud and Related Terminology: Preliminary Results and Discussion

John Spink et al. J Food Sci. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

The food industry is advancing at a rapid pace and consumer sensitivity to food safety scares and food fraud scandals is further amplified by rapid communication such as by social media. Academia, regulators, and industry practitioners alike struggle with an evolving issue regarding new terms and definitions including food fraud, food authenticity, food integrity, food protection, economically motivated adulteration, food crime, food security, contaminant, adulterant, and others. This research addressed some of the global need for clarification and harmonization of commonly used terminology. The 150 survey responses were received from various food-related workgroups or committee members, communication with recognized experts, and announcements to the food industry in general. Overall food fraud was identified as a "food safety" issue (86%). The food quality and manufacturing respondents focused mainly on incoming goods and adulterant-substances (<50%) rather than the other illegal activities such as counterfeiting, theft, gray market/diversion, and smuggling. Of the terms included to represent "intentional deception for economic gain" the respondents generally agreed with food fraud as the preferred term. Overall, the preference was 50% "food fraud," 15% "economically motivated adulteration" EMA, 9% "food protection," 7% "food integrity," 5% "food authenticity," and 2% "food crime." It appears that "food protection" and "food integrity" are terms that cover broader concepts such as all types of intentional acts and even possibly food safety or food quality. "Food authenticity" was defined with the phrase "to ensure" so seemed to be identified as an "attribute" that helped define fraudulent acts. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: Food Fraud-illegal deception for economic gain using food-is a rapidly evolving research topic and is facing confusion due to the use of different terms and definitions. This research survey presented common definitions and publication details to gain insight that could help provide clarity. The insight from this report provides guidance for others who are harmonizing terminology and setting the overall strategic direction.

Keywords: adulteration; authenticity; crime; economically motivated adulteration; food defense; food fraud; food protection; food safety; integrity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. CEN, European Committee for Standardization. (2018). CEN/CW 86 - Project Plan for the CEN Workshop - Authenticity in the feed and food chain - General principles and basic requirements - Workshop (approved during the kick-off meeting on 2017-05-11), Retrieved from ftp://ftp.cencenelec.eu/CEN/WhatWeDo/Fields/Food/WS/86/ProjectPlan.pdf
    1. CFSA, Chinese National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment (2015a). “China Regulation and Perspectives to Address Food Fraud and Non-Food Ingredient Adulterant, Food Safety Summit 2015, Presented by Dr. Yongning Wu, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.”
    1. CFSA, Chinese National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment (2015b). “Strategies for Ensuring Food Safety of Chinese Products - fight against food fraud, Presentation at the Institute for Food Technologists (IFT) Annual Conference 2015, Presented by Dr. Junshi Chen, Chicago, Illinois, USA.”
    1. CODEX, Codex Alimentarius (2014). Procedural Manual, Twenty-second edition. World Health Organization/Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Geneva/Rome.
    1. CODEX, Codex Alimentarious. (2017). Invitation to participate in the CCFICS EWG on Food Integrity and Food Authenticity, Home Page for WG on Food Integrity and Food Authenticity - CCFICS 23, August 7, 2017, [Accessed December 15, 2018], URL: Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/codexalimentarius/invitations/E...

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources