Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Sep 12;11(9):1355.
doi: 10.3390/cancers11091355.

Current Treatment Options for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Affiliations
Review

Current Treatment Options for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Carlo Cattrini et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

The possible treatments options for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) have dramatically increased during the last years. The old backbone, which androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is the exclusive approach for hormone-naïve patients, has been disrupted. Despite the fact that several high-quality, randomized, controlled phase 3 trials have been conducted in this setting, no direct comparison is currently available among the different strategies. Inadequate power, absence of preplanning and small sample size frequently affect the subgroup analyses according to disease volume or patient's risk. The choice between ADT alone and ADT combined with docetaxel, abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, apalutamide or radiotherapy to the primary tumor remains challenging. Factors that are related to the tumor, patient or drug side effects, currently guide these clinical decisions. This comprehensive review aims to indirectly compare the phase 3 trials in the mHSPC setting, in order to extrapolate data useful for treatment selection, providing also perspectives on future biomarkers.

Keywords: abiraterone acetate; apalutamide; docetaxel; enzalutamide; hormone-naïve prostate cancer; hormone-sensitive prostate cancer; radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

D.O. received honoraria, travel, accommodations, expenses and consulting from Janssen, Astellas, Bayer, Sanofi, Genetech, AstraZeneca, Clovis, Ipsen. D.O. received research funding from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Janssen, Genentech, Roche, Pfizer, Astellas Medivation, Tokai. E.C. received honoraria, travel, accommodations, expenses, consulting from Astellas Pharma, Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Roche. E.C. received research funding from AstraZeneca, Bayer and Janssen. R.L. received honoraria, travel, accommodations and expenses from Roche and Janssen-Cilag.

References

    1. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L.A., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Huggins C., Hodges C.V. Studies on prostatic cancer: I. The effect of castration, of estrogen and of androgen injection on serum phosphatases in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate. J. Urol. 2002;168:9–12. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64820-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prostate Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group . Maximum Androgen Blockade in Advanced Prostate Cancer: An Overview of the Randomised Trials. Prostate Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Volume 355. Lancet; London, UK: 2000. pp. 1491–1498. - PubMed
    1. Klotz L., Schellhammer P., Carroll K. A re-assessment of the role of combined androgen blockade for advanced prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2004;93:1177–1182. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2004.04803.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hussain M., Tangen C., Higano C., Vogelzang N., Thompson I. Evaluating Intermittent Androgen-Deprivation Therapy Phase III Clinical Trials: The Devil Is in the Details. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2016;34:280–285. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.8065. - DOI - PMC - PubMed