Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct;38(10):1028-1041.
doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 10.

The International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Twenty-second pediatric heart transplantation report - 2019; Focus theme: Donor and recipient size match

Affiliations

The International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Twenty-second pediatric heart transplantation report - 2019; Focus theme: Donor and recipient size match

Joseph W Rossano et al. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Oct.
No abstract available

Keywords: children; heart transplant; outcomes; registry; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of centers reporting pediatric heart transplants.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of centers by center volume (transplants: January 2005−June 2018).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diagnosis distribution by location (transplants: January 2005–June 2018). CHD, congenital heart disease; DCM, dilated cardiomyopathy.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Percentage of patients bridged with mechanical circulatory support by age group and diagnosis (transplants: January 2010–June 2018). CHD, congenital heart disease; DCM, dilated cardiomyopathy; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; TAH, total artificial heart; VAD, ventricular assist device.
Figure 5
Figure 5
PRA distribution by age group and diagnosis (transplants: January 2010–June 2018). CHD, congenital heart disease; DCM, dilated cardiomyopathy; PRA, panel reactive antibody.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Kaplan-Meier survival by recipient age at transplant (transplants: January 1992–June 2017). NS, not significant.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Kaplan-Meier survival conditional to survival to 1 year after transplant, by recipient age at transplant (transplants: January 1992–June 2017). NA, not applicable.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Kaplan-Meier survival by era (transplants: January 1982–June 2017). NA, not applicable.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Kaplan-Meier survival by recipient age group and diagnosis (transplants: January 2005–June 2017). CHD, congenital heart disease; DCM, dilated cardiomyopathy.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Induction immunosuppression use by era (transplants: January 2005–June 2018). ALG, anti-lymphocyte globulin; ATG, anti-thymocyte globulin; IL-2R, interleukin-2 receptor.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Maintenance immunosuppression drug combinations at 1-year follow-up (follow-ups: January 2005–June 2018). AZA, azathioprine; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MPA, mycophenolic acid.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Percentage of recipients experiencing treated rejection between discharge and 1-year follow-up by use of induction therapy (follow-ups: January 2005–June 2018). NS, not significant.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Freedom from CAV by use of induction therapy (transplants: January 1995–June 2017). CAV, cardiac allograft vasculopathy.
Figure 14
Figure 14
Survival following report of CAV (transplants: January 2005–June 2017). CAV, cardiac allograft vasculopathy.
Figure 15
Figure 15
Freedom from malignancy (transplants: January 1995–June 2017).
Figure 16
Figure 16
Relative incidence of leading causes of death (deaths: January 2005–June 2018). CAV, cardiac allograft vasculopathy; CMV, cytomegalovirus.
Figure 17
Figure 17
Kaplan-Meier survival rates after retransplant by intertransplant interval (transplants: January 1995–June 2017). TX, transplantation.
Figure 18
Figure 18
Donor-recipient height and weight match (transplants: January 2010–June 2018).
Figure 19
Figure 19
Distribution of donor-recipient weight match by recipient age (transplants: January 2010–June 2018).
Figure 20
Figure 20
Distribution of donor-recipient weight match by geographic location (transplants: January 2010–June 2018).
Figure 21
Figure 21
Kaplan-Meier survival within 1 year of transplant by donor-recipient weight match (transplants: January 2006–June 2017). NS, not significant.
Figure 22
Figure 22
Statistically significant categorical risk factors for 1-year mortality (transplants: January 2006–June 2017). CHD, congenital heart disease; CI, confidence interval; DCM, dilated cardiomyopathy; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; F, female; HR, hazard ratio; LCL, lower control limit; M, male; ReTX, retransplantation; UCL, upper control limit; VAD, ventricular assist device.
Figure 23
Figure 23
Hazard ratio of 1-year mortality by donor-recipient weight match (transplants: January 2006–June 2017).
Figure 24
Figure 24
Hazard ratio of 5-year mortality by donor-recipient height match (transplants: January 2003–June 2013).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sethi GK, Lanauze P, Rosado LJ, et al. Clinical significance of weight difference between donor and recipient in heart transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:444–8. - PubMed
    1. Taghavi S, Wilson LM, Brann SH, Gaughan J, Mangi AA. Cardiac transplantation can be safely performed with low donor-to-recipient body weight ratios. J Card Fail 2012;18:688–93. - PubMed
    1. Tamisier D, Vouhé P, Le Bidois J, Mauriat P, Khoury W, Leca F. Donorrecipient size matching in pediatric heart transplantation: a word of caution about small grafts. J Heart Lung Transplant 1996;15:190–5. - PubMed
    1. Kanani M, Hoskote A, Carter C, Burch M, Tsang V, Kostolny M. Increasing donor-recipient weight mismatch in pediatric orthotopic heart transplantation does not adversely affect outcome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012;41:427–34. - PubMed
    1. Tang L, Du W, Delius RE, L’Ecuyer TJ, Zilberman MV. Low donorto-recipient weight ratio does not negatively impact survival of pediatric heart transplant patients. Pediatr Transplant 2010;14:741–5. - PubMed