Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018;20(2):100-120.
doi: 10.1080/14643154.2018.1474330. Epub 2018 May 17.

Relations of Social Maturity, Executive Function, and Self-Efficacy Among Deaf University Students

Affiliations

Relations of Social Maturity, Executive Function, and Self-Efficacy Among Deaf University Students

Marc Marschark et al. Deafness Educ Int. 2018.

Abstract

This study explored possible associations of social maturity, executive function (EF), self-efficacy, and communication variables among deaf university students, both cochlear implant (CI) users and nonusers. Previous studies have demonstrated differences between deaf and hearing children and young adults in EF and EF-related social and cognitive functioning. EF differences also have been demonstrated between hearing children and deaf children who use CIs. Long-term influences of cochlear implantation in the social domain largely have not been explored, but were examined in the present study in terms of social maturity, as it might be related to EF and communication variables. Replicating and extending recent findings, social maturity was found to be related to somewhat different aspects of EF in CI users, deaf nonusers, and hearing students, but unrelated to hearing status, CI use, or deaf students' use of sign language versus spoken language. Self-efficacy proved a predictor of self-reported socially mature and immature behaviours for all groups. Individuals' beliefs about their parents' views of such behaviours was a potent predictor of behaviours for deaf CI users and those deaf students who reported sign language as their best form of communication.

Keywords: Cochlear implants; Hearing loss; Self-efficacy; Social maturity; Social-emotional functioning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bandura A (1997). Self-efficacy The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
    1. Bat-Chava Y, & Deignan E (2001). Peer relationships of children with cochlear implants. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 6, 186–199. doi: 10.1093/deafed/6.3.186 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Castellanos I, Kronenberger WG, & Pisoni DB (2016). Questionnaire-based assessment of executive functioning: Psychometrics. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 7, 93–109. doi: 10.1080/21622965.2016.1248557 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cates DS & Shontz FC (1990). Role-taking ability and social behaviour in deaf school children. American Annals of the Deaf, 135, 217–221. - PubMed
    1. Cheng S, Zhang L-F, & Hu X (2016). Thinking styles and university self-efficacy among deaf, hard-of-hearing, and hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 21, 44–53. doi: 10.1093/deafed/env032 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources