Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov;101(5):1144-1147.
doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0298.

Detection of Plasmodium falciparum by Light Microscopy, Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification, and Polymerase Chain Reaction on Day 3 after Initiation of Artemether-Lumefantrine Treatment for Uncomplicated Malaria in Bagamoyo District, Tanzania: A Comparative Trial

Affiliations

Detection of Plasmodium falciparum by Light Microscopy, Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification, and Polymerase Chain Reaction on Day 3 after Initiation of Artemether-Lumefantrine Treatment for Uncomplicated Malaria in Bagamoyo District, Tanzania: A Comparative Trial

Lwidiko E Mhamilawa et al. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Microscopy-determined Plasmodium falciparum positivity rates exceeding 10% on day 3 after initiation of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is an important indicator of artemisinin resistance. However, microscopy does not detect low-density parasitemia, contrary to molecular tools such as loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We compared microscopy, LAMP, and PCR for detection of P. falciparum on day 3 after ACT in 256 patients with uncomplicated malaria in Bagamoyo District, Tanzania. Day 3 positivity rates were 0%, 84.8%, and 84.4% for each method, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of LAMP against PCR was 100% (95% CI, 96.1-100) and 77.4% (95% CI, 58.9-90.4) when quantitative PCR-determined parasite densities were ≥ two parasites/µL. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification had comparable diagnostic accuracy to PCR and could potentially represent a field-friendly tool for determining day 3 positivity rates. However, what day 3 P. falciparum positivity determined using molecular methods represents needs to be further elucidated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart of screening by microscopy, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Reference standard: cytochrome B + 18 seconds PCR.

References

    1. Dondorp AM, et al. 2009. Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med 361: 455–467. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wwarn K, Group GS, 2019. Association of mutations in the Plasmodium falciparum Kelch13 gene (Pf3D7_1343700) with parasite clearance rates after artemisinin-based treatments-a WWARN individual patient data meta-analysis. BMC Med 17: 1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization , 2018. Status Report on Artemisinin Resistance and ACT Efficacy. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
    1. Lu F, et al. 2017. Emergence of indigenous artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum in Africa. N Engl J Med 376: 991–993. - PubMed
    1. Mwaiswelo R, Ngasala B, Jovel I, Xu W, Larsson E, Malmberg M, Gil JP, Premji Z, Mmbando BP, Mårtensson A, 2019. Prevalence of and risk factors associated with polymerase chain reaction-determined Plasmodium falciparum positivity on day 3 after initiation of artemether–lumefantrine treatment for uncomplicated malaria in Bagamoyo District, Tanzania. Am J Trop Med Hyg 100: 1179–1186. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources