Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 31551155
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1346
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the benefit of next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) for embryo selection in frozen-thawed embryo transfer.
Design: Randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Not applicable.
Patient(s): Women aged 25-40 years undergoing IVF with at least two blastocysts that could be biopsied.
Intervention(s): Randomization for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer with embryo selection based on PGT-A euploid status versus morphology.
Main outcome measure(s): Ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) at 20 weeks' gestation per embryo transfer.
Result(s): A total of 661 women (average age 33.7 ± 3.6 years) were randomized to PGT-A (n = 330) or morphology alone (n = 331). The OPR was equivalent between the two arms, with no significant difference per embryo transfer (50% [137/274] vs. 46% [143/313]) or per intention to treat (ITT) at randomization (41.8% [138/330] vs. 43.5% [144/331]). Post hoc analysis of women aged 35-40 years showed a significant increase in OPR per embryo transfer (51% [62/122] vs. 37% [54/145]) but not per ITT.
Conclusion(s): PGT-A did not improve overall pregnancy outcomes in all women, as analyzed per embryo transfer or per ITT. There was a significant increase in OPR per embryo transfer with the use of PGT-A in the subgroup of women aged 35-40 years who had two or more embryos that could be biopsied, but this was not significant when analyzed by ITT.
Clinical trial registration number: NCT02268786.
Keywords: IVF; frozen-thawed embryo transfer; next-generation sequencing; preimplantation genetic testing; single-embryo transfer.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: It's déjà vu all over again!Fertil Steril. 2019 Dec;112(6):1046-1047. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.08.102. Fertil Steril. 2019. PMID: 31843076 No abstract available.
-
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A)-finally revealed.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Mar;37(3):669-672. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01705-w. Epub 2020 Feb 2. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020. PMID: 32008181 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Optimal euploid embryo transfer strategy, fresh versus frozen, after preimplantation genetic screening with next generation sequencing: a randomized controlled trial.Fertil Steril. 2017 Mar;107(3):723-730.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.022. Epub 2017 Jan 27. Fertil Steril. 2017. PMID: 28139240 Clinical Trial.
-
Next generation sequencing for preimplantation genetic screening improves pregnancy outcomes compared with array comparative genomic hybridization in single thawed euploid embryo transfer cycles.Fertil Steril. 2018 Apr;109(4):627-632. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.12.017. Epub 2018 Mar 28. Fertil Steril. 2018. PMID: 29605407
-
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is associated with reduced live birth rates in fresh but not frozen donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of 18,562 donor cycles reported to Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System.Fertil Steril. 2025 Jan;123(1):50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.315. Epub 2024 Aug 10. Fertil Steril. 2025. PMID: 39128672
-
Should every embryo undergo preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy? A review of the modern approach to in vitro fertilization.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Nov;53:38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 25. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018. PMID: 30146380 Review.
-
Chromosomal mosaicism in human blastocysts: the ultimate diagnostic dilemma.Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Apr 15;26(3):313-334. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz050. Hum Reprod Update. 2020. PMID: 32141501 Review.
Cited by
-
Growth Hormone: A Potential Treatment of Patients with Refractory Thin Endometrium: A Clinical Trial Study.Int J Fertil Steril. 2022 Oct 9;16(4):251-255. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2022.541389.1210. Int J Fertil Steril. 2022. PMID: 36273309 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Donor oocyte recipients do not benefit from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy to improve pregnancy outcomes.Hum Reprod. 2020 Nov 1;35(11):2548-2555. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa219. Hum Reprod. 2020. PMID: 33057600 Free PMC article.
-
Conditions for improved accuracy of noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: Focusing on the zona pellucida and early blastocysts.Reprod Med Biol. 2024 Sep 10;23(1):e12604. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12604. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. Reprod Med Biol. 2024. PMID: 39263385 Free PMC article.
-
The prevalence, promotion and pricing of three IVF add-ons on fertility clinic websites.Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Nov;41(5):801-806. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.07.021. Epub 2020 Jul 27. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020. PMID: 32888824 Free PMC article.
-
Is it necessary for young patients with recurrent implantation failure to undergo preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy?Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 1;14:1020055. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1020055. eCollection 2023. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 36817579 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical