Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Sep 3:10:767.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00767. eCollection 2019.

Ethical Challenges of Germline Genetic Enhancement

Affiliations
Review

Ethical Challenges of Germline Genetic Enhancement

Ignacio Macpherson et al. Front Genet. .

Abstract

The new reproductive technologies have opened the door to different processes of germline genetic enhancement by which the characteristics of an individual according to the interests of the agents involved could be selected during its gestation. Although the initiative is apparently oriented towards developing individuals that would excel in society, critical voices raise the concerns about that this approach would generate and need for a reflection on the ethical, social and legal implications of these techniques and their implementation in society. We reviewed the literature about these issues throughout their historical records to date, focusing on the moral arguments and non-clinical aspects that affect the legal and social environment. We have observed various trends of thought with divergent positions (proactive, preventive, and regulatory) as well as a large number of articles that try to reconcile the different approaches. This review illustrates a series of concepts from the ethics and philosophy fields which are frequently used in studies that evaluate the ethical implications of germline genetic enhancement, such as dignity, benefit, autonomy, and identity. In addition, amongst the many unresolved controversies surrounding genetic enhancement, we identify procreative beneficence, genetic disassociation, gender selection, the value of disability, embryo chimerization, and the psychosocial inequality of potentially enhanced individuals as crucial. We also develop possible scenarios for future debate. We consider especially important the definition and specification of three aspects which are essential for the deployment of new reproductive technologies: the moral status of the embryo undergoing enhancement, the legal status of the enhanced individual, and the responsibility of the agents executing the enhancement. Finally, we propose the precautionary principle as a means to navigate ethical uncertainties.

Keywords: ELSI; genetic enhancement; genetic interventions; human identity; human procreation; precautionary principle; reprogenetic.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Agar N. (1995). Designing babies: morally permissible ways to modify the human genome. Bioethics 9 (1), 1–15. 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1995.tb00297.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alper J, Ard C, Asch A, Beckwith J, Conrad P, Geller LN, editors. (2002). The Double-Edged Helix: Social Implications of Genetics in a Diverse Society. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    1. AMA (1994). Ethical issues related to prenatal genetic testing. the council on ethical and judicial affairs, american medical association. Arch. Fam. Med. 3 (7), 633–642. 10.1001/archfami.3.7.633 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anomaly J. (2018). Defending eugenics: from cryptic choice to conscious selection. Monash Bioeth. Rev. 35 (1–4), 24–35. 10.1007/s40592-018-0081-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Appleby J. B., Bredenoord A. L. (2018). Should the 14-day rule for embryo research become the 28-day rule? EMBO Mol. Med. 10 (9), e9437. 10.15252/emmm.201809437 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources