Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019:21:10.1088/1367-2630/ab0be5.
doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/ab0be5.

Versatile laser-free trapped-ion entangling gates

Affiliations

Versatile laser-free trapped-ion entangling gates

R T Sutherland et al. New J Phys. 2019.

Abstract

We present a general theory for laser-free entangling gates with trapped-ion hyperfine qubits, using either static or oscillating magnetic-field gradients combined with a pair of uniform microwave fields symmetrically detuned about the qubit frequency. By transforming into a 'bichromatic' interaction picture, we show that either σ ^ ϕ σ ^ ϕ or σ ^ z σ ^ z geometric phase gates can be performed. The gate basis is determined by selecting the microwave detuning. The driving parameters can be tuned to provide intrinsic dynamical decoupling from qubit frequency fluctuations. The σ ^ z σ ^ z gates can be implemented in a novel manner which eases experimental constraints. We present numerical simulations of gate fidelities assuming realistic parameters.

Keywords: atomic physics; geometric phase gates; quantum computing; quantum gates; quantum logic; quantum physics; trapped-ions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Relative strengths of the gate Rabi frequencies versus 4Ωμ/δ for the first three resonances in the bichromatic interaction picture when the microwave field term (∝Ŝi) does not commute with the gradient term (∝Ŝj) in the Hamiltonian. Note that at the point where intrinsic dynamical decoupling occurs (dotted line), the values of the J1,2 Rabi frequencies are near their maximum values.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Numerical simulation of the fidelity F of the maximally entangled Bell state of equation (30) versus time (normalized to tf), for the σ^ϕσ^ϕ gate described in this section. In both panels, the high frequency blue line corresponds to equation (26), i.e. the ion frame Hamiltonian, and the the orange line corresponds to equation (28), i.e. the bichromatic interaction picture Hamiltonian. Panel (a) shows a gate with no pulse shaping, where large-amplitude oscillations at δ make the ion frame gate fidelity highly sensitive to the exact value of tf. Panel (b) shows the same gate operation including a τ = 10 μs Blackman envelope at the beginning and the end of the gate sequence; the ion frame fidelity smoothly approaches the interaction picture fidelity at the end of the gate.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
(a) Fidelity F of the gate operation creating the maximally entangled Bell state of equation (30) versus static qubit frequency shift ε normalized to gradient strength Ωg. Data in both panels are calculated by numerical integration of the full ion frame Hamiltonian given by equation (26). Here, Ŝi = Ŝx, Ŝj = Ŝz, Ωg/2π = 1 kHz, and δ/2π = 1.5 MHz (chosen to be experimentally realistic), with varying values of Ωμ. Fidelities are plotted for the intrinsically dynamically decoupled σ^ϕσ^ϕ gate (4Ωμ/δ ≃ 2.405, black solid line), the fastest σ^ϕσ^ϕ gate (4Ωμ/δ ≃ 1.841, red dashed line), the σ^ϕσ^ϕ gate shown in figure 2 (4Ωμ/δ ≃ 1.333, orange solid line), as well as the fastest σ^Zσ^Z gate with a spin-echo (4Ωμ/δ ≃ 3.054, green dotted line) described in section 4.2. (b) Infidelity 1F of the σ^ϕσ^ϕ gate versus the frequency ωε at which the qubit shift ε oscillates, for the intrinsically dynamically decoupled gate (solid black) and the fastest σ^ϕσ^ϕ gate (red dashed), for a particular value of ε0 = Ωg. This value of ε0 represents a significantly larger qubit shift than is typically seen experimentally, where ∣ε0∣ ≪ Ωg [16]. The gray lines show the effect of ±1% relative changes in the ratio 4Ωμ/δ for the intrinsically dynamically decoupled gate.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Infidelity 1F of the σ^zσ^z gate versus the frequency ωε at which the qubit shift ε oscillates, for the intrinsically dynamically decoupled gate (solid black) and the fastest σ^zσ^z gate (red dashed), for a particular value of ε0 = Ωg. This value of ε0 represents a significantly larger qubit shift than is typically seen experimentally, where ∣ε0∣ ≪ Ωg [16]. The gray lines show the effect of ±1% relative changes in the ratio 4Ωμ/δ for the intrinsically dynamically decoupled gate. Data are calculated by numerical integration of the full ion frame Hamiltonian given by equation (26).

References

    1. Cirac JI and Zoller P 1995. Phys. Rev. Lett 74 4091. - PubMed
    1. Monroe C, Meekhof DM, King BE, Itano WM and Wineland DJ 1995. Phys. Rev. Lett 75 4714. - PubMed
    1. Nielsen MA and Chuang IL 2010. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; )
    1. Häffner H, Roos CF and Blatt R 2008. Phys. Rep 469 155
    1. Blatt R and Wineland DJ 2008. Nature 453 1008. - PubMed