Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug;7(16):366.
doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.05.35.

Preoperative D-dimer level is an independent prognostic factor for non-small cell lung cancer after surgical resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations

Preoperative D-dimer level is an independent prognostic factor for non-small cell lung cancer after surgical resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Han-Yu Deng et al. Ann Transl Med. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Whether high preoperative D-dimer level has any impact on long-term survival of patients with surgically treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted the first meta-analysis focusing specifically on prognostic value of high preoperative D-dimer level in NSCLC patients after surgical resection comprehensively.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search for relevant studies in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science on January 28, 2019. Data for analysis consisted of hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) from multivariate analysis and were analyzed by using the STATA 12.0 package.

Results: Finally, we included a total of 6 cohort studies consisting of 1,817 patients with surgically treated NSCLC for analysis. Our meta-analysis found that NSCLC patients with high preoperative D-dimer level had a significantly worse OS (random effects: HR =2.04; 95% CI: 1.30-3.20; P=0.002; I2=67.4%) and DFS (fixed effects: HR =1.98; 95% CI: 1.41-2.78; P<0.001; I2=0.0%) than these with normal preoperative D-dimer level after surgery. However, potential heterogeneity and publication bias was observed during analysis.

Conclusions: High pretreatment level of D-dimer remains to be an independent predictor of poor prognosis in NSCLC patients after surgery. Further well-conducted studies with appropriate adjustments are needed to confirm and update our conclusions.

Keywords: D-dimer; meta-analysis; non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); prognosis; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A flow chart showing the progress of study evaluation throughout the meta-analysis. SCLC, small cell lung cancer; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plots of (A) overall survival, and (B) disease-free survival rate. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sensitivity analysis for overall survival. CI, confidence interval.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Funnel plot of the included studies for analysis of overall survival. Begg’s test: P=0.014; Egger’s test: P=0.007.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394-424. 10.3322/caac.21492 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gadgeel SM, Ramalingam SS, Kalemkerian GP. Treatment of lung cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 2012;50:961-74. 10.1016/j.rcl.2012.06.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goldstraw P, Ball D, Jett JR, et al. Non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet 2011;378:1727-40. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62101-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cruz C, Afonso M, Oliveiros B, et al. Recurrence and Risk Factors for Relapse in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated by Surgery with Curative Intent. Oncology 2017;92:347-52. 10.1159/000458533 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thakur MK, Gadgeel SM. Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2016;37:760-70. 10.1055/s-0036-1592337 - DOI - PubMed