Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec;38(12):1128-1136.
doi: 10.1037/hea0000800. Epub 2019 Sep 26.

Associations between self-monitoring and weight change in behavioral weight loss interventions

Stephanie P Goldstein  1 , Carly M Goldstein  1 , Dale S Bond  1 , Hollie A Raynor  2 , Rena R Wing  1 , J Graham Thomas  1
Affiliations

Associations between self-monitoring and weight change in behavioral weight loss interventions

Stephanie P Goldstein et al. Health Psychol. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: The current study is a secondary analysis of the Live SMART trial, a randomized controlled trial comparing a behavioral weight loss (BWL) condition delivered via smartphone (SMART) to a group-based BWL condition (GROUP) and a control condition (CONTROL). Given the established importance of self-monitoring for weight loss, the aims were to evaluate bidirectional associations between adherence to self-monitoring and weight change and to examine the moderating effect of treatment condition on these associations.

Method: Adults with overweight/obesity (n = 276; 83% women; 92.8% White; Mage = 55.1 years; Mbody mass index = 35.2 kg/m2) were instructed to self-monitor dietary intake, daily weight, and physical activity minutes via paper diaries in GROUP and CONTROL and via a smartphone application in SMART. All participants were weighed monthly at the research center. Adherence to self-monitoring was assessed via examination of self-monitoring records.

Results: Generalized linear mixed models revealed that adherence to self-monitoring of dietary intake, self-weighing, and physical activity for each month was associated with weight change throughout that month, such that increased frequency of self-monitoring led to greater weight loss (ps < .001). For the GROUP condition only, poorer weight losses in 1 month were prospectively associated with poor adherence to self-monitoring the following month (ps ≤ .01).

Conclusions: Results provide evidence of a bidirectional association between self-monitoring and weight change. Better self-monitoring was consistently associated with better weight loss across intervention and tracking modalities. Poorer weight loss was prospectively associated with poorer self-monitoring in group treatment, suggesting that social influences could drive adherence in this form of treatment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01724632.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Percentage of Missing Data: Self-monitoring and Percent Weight Loss Notes: Missing self-monitoring data are representative of records with no days of monitoring or records not turned in; Percent weight loss is representative of attendance at clinic visits (i.e., a value is missing if the participant did not attend the current and/or previous clinic visit for that particular month); Adherence to self-monitoring across conditions can be found in the primary outcomes paper (Thomas et al., 2019).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Prospective association between adherence to self-monitoring and %WL across treatment conditions. In (a), adherence to self-monitoring dietary intake is pictured, followed by adherence to self-monitoring weight (b) and physical activity (c). Note: Greater %WL is indicative of more weight loss
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Alamuddin N, & Wadden TA (2016). Behavioral treatment of the patient with obesity. Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America, 45(3), 565–580. doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2016.04.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Atkins DC, Baldwin SA, Zheng C, Gallop RJ, & Neighbors C (2013). A tutorial on count regression and zero-altered count models for longitudinal substance use data. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27(1), 166. doi:10.1037/a0029508 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bandura A (1998). Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychology and Health, 13(4), 623–649. doi:10.1080/08870449808407422 - DOI
    1. Bandura A (2011). Social Cognitive Theory (Vol. 2012).
    1. Borg P, Fogelholm M, & Kukkonen-Harjula K (2004). Food selection and eating behaviour during weight maintenance intervention and 2-y follow-up in obese men. International Journal of Obesity, 28(12), 1548. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0802790 - DOI - PubMed

Associated data