Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Sep 27;18(1):135.
doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1039-6.

Health, life and rights: a discourse analysis of a hybrid abortion regime in Tanzania

Affiliations
Review

Health, life and rights: a discourse analysis of a hybrid abortion regime in Tanzania

Richard Sambaiga et al. Int J Equity Health. .

Abstract

Background: Unsafe abortion continues to be a major hazard for maternal health in Sub-Saharan Africa, where abortion remains highly controversial and access to safe abortion services is unequally distributed. Although national abortion laws are central in indicating women's potential for accessing safe abortion services, the character of an abortion law may alone say little about national discursive abortion landscapes and access scenarios. The article calls for the study and problematization of the relationship between legal abortion frameworks on the one hand, and discourses surrounding abortion on the other, in an attempt to move closer to an understanding of the complexity of factors that influence knowledge about and access to safer abortion services. With the restrictive abortion law in Tanzania as a starting point, the paper explores the ways in which the major global abortion discourses manifest themselves in the country and indicate potential implications of a hybrid abortion regime.

Methods: The study combined a review of major legal and policy documents on abortion, a review of publications on abortion in Tanzanian newspapers between 2000 and 2015 (300 articles), and 23 semi-structured qualitative interviews with representatives from central institutions and organizations engaged in policy- or practical work related to reproductive health.

Results: Tanzania's abortion law is highly restrictive, but the discursive abortion landscape is diverse and is made manifest through legal- and policy documents and legal- and policy related disputes. The discourses were characterized by diverse frames of reference based in religion, public health and in human rights-based values, and as such reflect the major global discourses. Fairclough's concepts interdiscursivity and recontextualization were drawn upon to develop an understanding of how the concepts health, rights and life emerge across the discourses, but are employed in contrasting lines of argumentation in struggles for hegemony and legitimacy.

Discussion and conclusions: The paper demonstrates that a hybrid discursive regime relating to abortion characterizes the legally restrictive abortion context of Tanzania. We argue that such a complex discursive landscape, which cuts across the restrictive - liberal divide, generates an environment that seems to open avenues for enhanced access to abortion related knowledge and services.

Keywords: Abortion law; Abortion policy; Access to safe abortion services; Discourses on abortion; East- Africa; Tanzania.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Caldwell J, Caldwell P. Introduction. Induced abortion in a changing world in the sociocultural and political aspects of abortion: global perspectives. Westpoint: Preager Publisher; 2003.
    1. Norris A, Bessett D, Steinberg JR, Kavanaugh ML, De Zordo S, Becker D. Abortion stigma: a reconceptualization of constituents. causes and consequences Women’s Health Issues. 2011;21(3):49–54. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2011.02.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Storeng KT, Ouattara F. The politics of unsafe abortion in Burkina Faso: the interface of local norms and global public health practice. Global Public Health. 2014;9(8):946–956. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2014.937828. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berer M. Abortion law and policy around the world: in search of decriminalization. Health and Human Right. 2017;19:1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Storeng KT, Palmer J, Daire J, Kloster MO. Behind the scene: international NGO’s influence on reproductive health policy in Malawi and South Sudan. Global Public Health. 2019;14(4):8. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2018.1446545. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types