Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jan;20(1):10-18.
doi: 10.1111/ajt.15620. Epub 2019 Oct 28.

Trained immunity in organ transplantation

Affiliations
Review

Trained immunity in organ transplantation

Jordi Ochando et al. Am J Transplant. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Consistent induction of donor-specific unresponsiveness in the absence of continuous immunosuppressive therapy and toxic effects remains a difficult task in clinical organ transplantation. Transplant immunologists have developed numerous experimental treatments that target antigen-presentation (signal 1), costimulation (signal 2), and cytokine production (signal 3) to establish transplantation tolerance. While promising results have been obtained using therapeutic approaches that predominantly target the adaptive immune response, the long-term graft survival rates remain suboptimal. This suggests the existence of unrecognized allograft rejection mechanisms that contribute to organ failure. We postulate that trained immunity stimulatory pathways are critical to the immune response that mediates graft loss. Trained immunity is a recently discovered functional program of the innate immune system, which is characterized by nonpermanent epigenetic and metabolic reprogramming of macrophages. Since trained macrophages upregulate costimulatory molecules (signal 2) and produce pro-inflammatory cytokines (signal 3), they contribute to potent graft reactive immune responses and organ transplant rejection. In this review, we summarize the detrimental effects of trained immunity in the context of organ transplantation and describe pathways that induce macrophage training associated with graft rejection.

Keywords: immunobiology; immunosuppression/immune modulation; infection and infectious agents; infectious disease; macrophage/monocyte biology: activation; rejection; tolerance: mechanisms; translational research/science.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors of this manuscript have conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the American Journal of Transplantation. JO, WJMM, ZAF, and MGN declare that they are scientific founders of Trained Therapeutics Discovery.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trained immunity danger signals that compromise organ transplantation. Trained immunity–inducing agents, such as infection (viral, bacterial, and fungical), activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, Western diet, sugar, OxLDL, and cell death are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in organ transplant patients. HMGB1, high mobility group box 1; IL, interleukin; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; NOD2, Nod‐like receptor 2; NLRP, NOD‐like receptor pyrin domain‐containing‐3; OxLDL, oxidized low‐density lipoprotein; TLR4, Toll‐like receptor 4; TNFα, tumor necrosis factor α

References

    1. Miller JF. Immunological function of the thymus. Lancet. 1961;2(7205):748‐749. - PubMed
    1. Flanagan SP. 'Nude', a new hairless gene with pleiotropic effects in the mouse. Genet Res. 1966;8(3):295‐309. - PubMed
    1. Pantelouris EM. Observations on the immunobiology of 'nude' mice. Immunology. 1971;20(2):247‐252. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Corthay A. A three‐cell model for activation of naive T helper cells. Scand J Immunol. 2006;64(2):93‐96. - PubMed
    1. Page EK, Dar WA, Knechtle SJ. Tolerogenic therapies in transplantation. Front Immunol. 2012;3:198. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms