Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;19(2):134-141.
doi: 10.1177/1474515119880062. Epub 2019 Sep 28.

Blended collaborative care in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease improves risk factor control: Results of a randomised feasibility study

Affiliations

Blended collaborative care in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease improves risk factor control: Results of a randomised feasibility study

Lena Bosselmann et al. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Risk factor control is essential in limiting the progression of coronary heart disease, but the necessary active patient involvement is often difficult to realise, especially in patients suffering psychosocial risk factors (e.g. distress). Blended collaborative care has been shown as an effective treatment addition, in which a (non-physician) care manager supports patients in implementing and sustaining lifestyle changes, follows-up on patients, and integrates care across providers, targeting both, somatic and psychosocial risk factors.

Aims: The aim of this study was to test the feasibility, acceptance and effect of a six-month blended collaborative care intervention in Germany.

Methods: For our randomised controlled pilot study with a crossover design we recruited coronary heart disease patients with ⩾1 insufficiently controlled cardiac risk factors and randomised them to either immediate blended collaborative care intervention (immediate intervention group, n=20) or waiting control (waiting control group, n=20).

Results: Participation rate in the intervention phase was 67% (n=40), and participants reported high satisfaction (M=1.63, standard deviation=0.69; scale 1 (very high) to 5 (very low)). The number of risk factors decreased significantly from baseline to six months in the immediate intervention group (t(60)=3.07, p=0.003), but not in the waiting control group t(60)=-0.29, p=0.77). Similarly, at the end of their intervention following the six-month waiting period, the waiting control group also showed a significant reduction of risk factors (t(60)=3.88, p<0.001).

Conclusion: This study shows that blended collaborative care can be a feasible, accepted and effective addition to standard medical care in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in the German healthcare system.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02389153.

Keywords: Coronary heart disease; behaviour modification; collaborative care; patient-centred care; risk factors; stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Associated data