Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;3(1):80-91.
doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.08.014. Epub 2019 Sep 26.

Adherence to Active Surveillance Protocols for Low-risk Prostate Cancer: Results of the Movember Foundation's Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Initiative

Arveen A Kalapara  1 , Jan F M Verbeek  2 , Daan Nieboer  3 , Michael Fahey  4 , Vincent Gnanapragasam  5 , Mieke Van Hemelrijck  6 , Lui Shiong Lee  7 , Chris H Bangma  2 , Ewout W Steyerberg  8 , Tim Harkin  1 , Jozien Helleman  2 , Monique J Roobol  2 , Mark Frydenberg  9 ; Movember Foundation’s Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) Consortium
Collaborators, Affiliations

Adherence to Active Surveillance Protocols for Low-risk Prostate Cancer: Results of the Movember Foundation's Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Initiative

Arveen A Kalapara et al. Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Active surveillance (AS) enrolment criteria and follow-up schedules for low-risk prostate cancer vary between institutions. However, uncertainty remains about adherence to these protocols.

Objective: To determine adherence to institution-specific AS inclusion criteria and follow-up schedules within the Movember Foundation's Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) initiative.

Design, setting, and participants: We retrospectively assessed the data of 15 101 patients from 25 established AS cohorts worldwide between 2014 and 2016.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Adherence to individual AS inclusion criteria was rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from poor to excellent. Nonadherence to follow-up schedules was defined as absence of repeat biopsy 1 yr after the scheduled date. Cohorts were pooled into annual and Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance (PRIAS)-based biopsy schedules, and a generalised linear mixed model was constructed to test for nonadherence.

Results and limitations: Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) inclusion criteria were followed in 92%, Gleason score (GS) criteria were followed in 97%, and the number of positive biopsy cores was followed in 94% of men. Both age and tumour stage (T stage) criteria had 99% adherence overall. Pooled nonadherence rates increased over time-8%, 16%, and 34% for annual schedules and 11%, 30%, and 29% for PRIAS-based schedules at 1, 4, and 7 yr, respectively-and did not differ between biopsy schedules. A limitation is that our results do not consider the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Conclusions: In on-going development of evidence-based AS protocols, variable adherence to PSA and GS inclusion criteria should be considered. Repeat biopsy adherence reduces with increased duration of surveillance, independent of biopsy frequency. This emphasises the importance of risk stratification at the commencement of AS.

Patient summary: We studied adherence to active surveillance protocols for prostate cancer worldwide. We found that inclusion criteria were generally followed well, but adherence to repeat biopsy reduced with time. This should be considered when optimising future active surveillance protocols.

Keywords: Active surveillance; Adherence; Prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Active Surveillance Doing Well Under Surveillance.
    Ellen O, Jada K, Jiasian T, Nathan L, Declan GM. Ellen O, et al. Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Feb;3(1):92-93. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Dec 13. Eur Urol Oncol. 2020. PMID: 31839586 No abstract available.

Publication types