Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 30;22(3):143-147.
doi: 10.5770/cgj.22.359. eCollection 2019 Sep.

The Evaluation of an Osteoporosis Clinic in a Community Hospital Setting: a Retrospective Chart Review and Telephone Survey

Affiliations

The Evaluation of an Osteoporosis Clinic in a Community Hospital Setting: a Retrospective Chart Review and Telephone Survey

Timothy S H Kwok et al. Can Geriatr J. .

Abstract

Background: Patients who have suffered fragility fractures are at an increased risk for subsequent fractures. The Osteoporosis (OP) Clinic at Markham Stouffville Hospital (MSH) was set up in July 2015 to screen, diagnose, and treat patients with fragility fractures. The goal of this study was to identify differences in OP screening and treatment initiation between patients seen in the OP clinic versus usual care.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study and telephone interview was conducted on 40 patients who had sustained a hip fragility fracture between September 2015 and July 2016. 20 of those patients were referred to the OP clinic, while the remaining patients received usual care.

Results: At the end of the intervention, 16/20 patients in the OP clinic group were appropriately placed on a bisphosphonate/RANKL inhibitor versus only 6/20 patients in the usual care group (p < .01).

Conclusions: A significant care gap exists in secondary fracture prevention between the osteoporosis clinic and usual care groups. Better screening and subsequent intervention are needed for patients with fragility fractures. This study highlights the efficacy of an outpatient OP clinic in a community hospital setting.

Keywords: community medicine; osteoporosis; quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES The authors declare that no conflicts of interest exist.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Inclusion/exclusion flowchart of the Osteoporosis Clinic and Usual Care groups

Similar articles

References

    1. Van den Bergh JP, van Geel TA, Geusens PP. Osteoporosis, frailty and fracture: implications for case finding and therapy. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012;8(3):163–72. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2011.217. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McLellan AR, Gallacher SJ, Fraser M, et al. The fracture liaison service: success of a program for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporosis Int. 2003;14(12):1028–34. doi: 10.1007/s00198-003-1507-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Curtis J, Silverman SL. Commentary: The five Ws of a fracture liaison service: why, who, what, where and how? In osteoporosis, we reap what we sow. Curr Osteoporosis Rep. 2013;11(4):365–68. doi: 10.1007/s11914-013-0177-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aizer J, Bolster MB. Fracture liaison services: promoting enhanced bone health care. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2014;16(11):455. doi: 10.1007/s11926-014-0455-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Von Friesendorff M, McGuigan FE, Wizert A, et al. Hip fracture, mortality risk, and cause of death over two decades. Osteoporosis Int. 2016;27(10):2945–53. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3616-5. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources