Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 20;4(2):2381468319871018.
doi: 10.1177/2381468319871018. eCollection 2019 Jul-Dec.

Culture, Self, and Medical Decision Making in Australia and China: A Structural Model Analysis

Affiliations

Culture, Self, and Medical Decision Making in Australia and China: A Structural Model Analysis

Hankiz Dolan et al. MDM Policy Pract. .

Abstract

Objective. To explore and compare the influences of individual-level cultural values and personal attitudinal values on the desire for medical information and self-involvement in decision making in Australia and China. Methods. A total of 288 and 291 middle-aged adults from Australia and China, respectively, completed an online survey examining cultural and personal values, and their desired level of self-influence on medical decision making. Structural equation modeling was used to test 15 hypotheses relating to the effects of cultural and personal antecedents on the individual desire for influence over medical decision making. Results. Similar factors in both Australia and China (total variance explained: Australia 29%; China 35%) predicted desire for medical information, with interdependence (unstandardized path coefficient βAustralia = 0.102, P = 0.014; βChina = 0.215, P = 0.001), independence (βAustralia = 0.244, P < 0.001; βChina = 0.123, P = 0.037), and health locus of control (βAustralia = -0.140, P = 0.018; βChina = -0.138, P = 0.007) being significant and positive predictors. A desire for involvement in decisions was only predicted by power distance, which had an opposite effect of being negative for Australia and positive for China (total variance explained: Australia 11%; China 5%; βAustralia = 0.294, P < 0.001; China: βChina = -0.190, P = 0.043). National culture moderated the effect of independence on desire for medical information, which was stronger in Australia than China (Z score = 1.687, P < 0.05). Conclusions. Study results demonstrate that in both countries, desire for medical information can be influenced by individual-level cultural and personal values, suggesting potential benefits of tailoring health communication to personal mindsets to foster informed decision making. The desired level of self-involvement in decision making was relatively independent of other cultural and personal values in both countries, suggesting caution against cultural stereotypes. Study findings also suggest that involvement preferences in decision making should be considered separately from information needs at the clinical encounter.

Keywords: culture; independence; interdependence; medical decision making; power distance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proposed structural model for both Australia and China. DesLev, desired level of self-involvement; HLC, health locus of control; IND, independence; InfoSeek, desire for medical information; PD, power distance; RISC, relational-interdependence.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Structural equation model: Australia and China (significant paths only, P < 0.05). Percentages: Total variance explained.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McCaffery KJ, Smith SK, Wolf M. The challenge of shared decision making among patients with lower literacy: a framework for research and development. Med Decis Making. 2010;30(1):35–44. - PubMed
    1. Sheridan SL, Harris RP, Woolf SH; Shared Decision-Making Workgroup of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention: a suggested approach from the US Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26(1):56–66. - PubMed
    1. Coulter A, Collins A. Making Shared Decision-Making a Reality: No Decision About Me, Without Me. London: King’s Fund; 2011.
    1. Institute of Medicine. Partnering With Patients to Drive Shared Decisions, Better Value, and Care Improvement: Workshop Proceedings. Washington: National Academies Press; 2014. - PubMed
    1. Health Canada. Health Canada Policy Toolkit for Public Involvement in Decision Making. Ottawa: Health Canada; 2000.

LinkOut - more resources