Culture, Self, and Medical Decision Making in Australia and China: A Structural Model Analysis
- PMID: 31565670
- PMCID: PMC6755644
- DOI: 10.1177/2381468319871018
Culture, Self, and Medical Decision Making in Australia and China: A Structural Model Analysis
Abstract
Objective. To explore and compare the influences of individual-level cultural values and personal attitudinal values on the desire for medical information and self-involvement in decision making in Australia and China. Methods. A total of 288 and 291 middle-aged adults from Australia and China, respectively, completed an online survey examining cultural and personal values, and their desired level of self-influence on medical decision making. Structural equation modeling was used to test 15 hypotheses relating to the effects of cultural and personal antecedents on the individual desire for influence over medical decision making. Results. Similar factors in both Australia and China (total variance explained: Australia 29%; China 35%) predicted desire for medical information, with interdependence (unstandardized path coefficient βAustralia = 0.102, P = 0.014; βChina = 0.215, P = 0.001), independence (βAustralia = 0.244, P < 0.001; βChina = 0.123, P = 0.037), and health locus of control (βAustralia = -0.140, P = 0.018; βChina = -0.138, P = 0.007) being significant and positive predictors. A desire for involvement in decisions was only predicted by power distance, which had an opposite effect of being negative for Australia and positive for China (total variance explained: Australia 11%; China 5%; βAustralia = 0.294, P < 0.001; China: βChina = -0.190, P = 0.043). National culture moderated the effect of independence on desire for medical information, which was stronger in Australia than China (Z score = 1.687, P < 0.05). Conclusions. Study results demonstrate that in both countries, desire for medical information can be influenced by individual-level cultural and personal values, suggesting potential benefits of tailoring health communication to personal mindsets to foster informed decision making. The desired level of self-involvement in decision making was relatively independent of other cultural and personal values in both countries, suggesting caution against cultural stereotypes. Study findings also suggest that involvement preferences in decision making should be considered separately from information needs at the clinical encounter.
Keywords: culture; independence; interdependence; medical decision making; power distance.
© The Author(s) 2019.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Culture and medical decision making: Healthcare consumer perspectives in Japan and the United States.Health Psychol. 2015 Dec;34(12):1133-44. doi: 10.1037/hea0000229. Epub 2015 Jun 15. Health Psychol. 2015. PMID: 26076003
-
Who Decides: Me or We? Family Involvement in Medical Decision Making in Eastern and Western Countries.Med Decis Making. 2018 Jan;38(1):14-25. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17715628. Epub 2017 Jul 8. Med Decis Making. 2018. PMID: 28691551
-
Family involvement in medical decision making in Europe and the United States: A replication and extension in five Countries.Soc Sci Med. 2022 May;301:114932. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114932. Epub 2022 Mar 26. Soc Sci Med. 2022. PMID: 35378430
-
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003. PMID: 14698953 Review.
-
Cultural targeting and tailoring of shared decision making technology: a theoretical framework for improving the effectiveness of patient decision aids in culturally diverse groups.Soc Sci Med. 2014 Mar;105:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Jan 15. Soc Sci Med. 2014. PMID: 24606791 Review.
Cited by
-
Becoming through simulation-based learning: Lived experiences of occupational therapy students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds.Aust Occup Ther J. 2025 Aug;72(4):e70044. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.70044. Aust Occup Ther J. 2025. PMID: 40842112 Free PMC article.
-
Information Access and Use by Patients With Cancer and Their Friends and Family: Development of a Grounded Theory.J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 29;22(10):e20510. doi: 10.2196/20510. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 33118940 Free PMC article.
-
Support Networks and Care Needs: Insights From Older Vietnam-Born Australians Living With Chronic Disease.Nurs Health Sci. 2025 Jun;27(2):e70158. doi: 10.1111/nhs.70158. Nurs Health Sci. 2025. PMID: 40509751 Free PMC article.
References
-
- McCaffery KJ, Smith SK, Wolf M. The challenge of shared decision making among patients with lower literacy: a framework for research and development. Med Decis Making. 2010;30(1):35–44. - PubMed
-
- Sheridan SL, Harris RP, Woolf SH; Shared Decision-Making Workgroup of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention: a suggested approach from the US Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26(1):56–66. - PubMed
-
- Coulter A, Collins A. Making Shared Decision-Making a Reality: No Decision About Me, Without Me. London: King’s Fund; 2011.
-
- Institute of Medicine. Partnering With Patients to Drive Shared Decisions, Better Value, and Care Improvement: Workshop Proceedings. Washington: National Academies Press; 2014. - PubMed
-
- Health Canada. Health Canada Policy Toolkit for Public Involvement in Decision Making. Ottawa: Health Canada; 2000.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources