Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec;179(12):2382-2392.
doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61365. Epub 2019 Sep 30.

Trisomy 13 and 18-Prevalence and mortality-A multi-registry population based analysis

Affiliations

Trisomy 13 and 18-Prevalence and mortality-A multi-registry population based analysis

Nitin Goel et al. Am J Med Genet A. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

The aim of the study is to determine the prevalence, outcomes, and survival (among live births [LB]), in pregnancies diagnosed with trisomy 13 (T13) and 18 (T18), by congenital anomaly register and region. Twenty-four population- and hospital-based birth defects surveillance registers from 18 countries, contributed data on T13 and T18 between 1974 and 2014 using a common data-reporting protocol. The mean total birth prevalence (i.e., LB, stillbirths, and elective termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies [ETOPFA]) in the registers with ETOPFA (n = 15) for T13 was 1.68 (95% CI 1.3-2.06), and for T18 was 4.08 (95% CI 3.01-5.15), per 10,000 births. The prevalence varied among the various registers. The mean prevalence among LB in all registers for T13 was 0.55 (95%CI 0.38-0.72), and for T18 was 1.07 (95% CI 0.77-1.38), per 10,000 births. The median mortality in the first week of life was 48% for T13 and 42% for T18, across all registers, half of which occurred on the first day of life. Across 16 registers with complete 1-year follow-up, mortality in first year of life was 87% for T13 and 88% for T18. This study provides an international perspective on prevalence and mortality of T13 and T18. Overall outcomes and survival among LB were poor with about half of live born infants not surviving first week of life; nevertheless about 10% survived the first year of life. Prevalence and outcomes varied by country and termination policies. The study highlights the variation in screening, data collection, and reporting practices for these conditions.

Keywords: Edwards syndrome; Patau syndrome; congenital anomaly register; trisomies; trisomy 13; trisomy 18.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Total prevalence data for Trisomy 13 (1974–2015) from all registers (a) with complete data on LB, SB, and ETOPFA; (b) with data only on LB and SB. ETOPFA, elective termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies; LB, live births; SB, stillbirths
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
(a) Pregnancy outcomes in all registers in Trisomy 13 between 1974 and 2015; (b) Three-year rolling averages for prevalence of Trisomy 13 in registers where ETOPFA is reported (2001–2012). ETOPFA, elective termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Live birth prevalence in all registers in Trisomy 13 (1974–2015)
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Mortality in live births (Trisomy 13). (a) One-year follow-up data in all registers*; (b) Five-year follow-up in registers where outcomes were known; (c) First year mortality from (b) shown in further detail (dotted line represent 95% CI)
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Total prevalence data for Trisomy 18 (1974–2015) from all registers (a) with complete data on LB, SB, and ETOPFA; (b) with data only on LB and SB. ETOPFA, elective termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies; LB, live births; SB, stillbirths
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
(a) Pregnancy outcomes in all registers in Trisomy 18 between 1974 and 2015; (b) Three-year rolling averages for prevalence of Trisomy 18 in registers where ETOPFA is reported (2002–2013). ETOPFA, elective termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Live birth prevalence in all registers in Trisomy 18 (1974–2015)
FIGURE 8
FIGURE 8
Mortality in live births (Trisomy 18). (a) One-year follow-up data in all registers*; (b) Five-year follow-up in registers where outcomes were known; (c) First year mortality from (b) shown in further detail (dotted line represent 95% CI)

Comment in

References

    1. Brewer CM (2002). Survival in trisomy 13 and trisomy 18 cases ascertained from population based registers. Journal of Medical Genetics, 39(9), 54e–554e. 10.1136/jmg.39.9.e54 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Domingo L, Carey JC, Eckhauser A, Wilkes J, & Menon SC (2018). Mortality and resource use following cardiac interventions in children with trisomy 13 and trisomy 18 and congenital heart disease. Pediatric Cardiology, 40, 349–356. 10.1007/s00246-018-2001-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. ICBDSR. (2014). Annual report. Retrieved from http://www.icbdsr.org/wpcontent/annual_report/Report2014.pdf.
    1. Irving C, Richmond S, Wren C, Longster C, & Embleton ND (2010). Changes in fetal prevalence and outcome for trisomies 13 and 18: A population-based study over 23 years. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 24(1), 137–141. 10.3109/14767051003758879 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Janvier A, Farlow B, & Barrington KJ (2016). Parental hopes, interventions, and survival of neonates with trisomy 13 and trisomy 18. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics, 172(3), 279–287. 10.1002/ajmg.c.31526 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types