Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Oct;31(10):300-306.

Comparison of TransFemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Performed With a Minimally Invasive Simplified Technique: "FAST" Versus a Standard Approach

Affiliations
  • PMID: 31567114
Free article
Comparative Study

Comparison of TransFemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Performed With a Minimally Invasive Simplified Technique: "FAST" Versus a Standard Approach

Grégoire Lefèvre et al. J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Oct.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the safety and efficacy of a new simplified procedure for transfemoral (TF) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): the FAST protocol.

Background: A minimalist approach for TF-TAVR has been reported. The goal of this simplified strategy is to reduce the rate of specific complications associated with general anesthesia, second vascular access, and use of temporary pacemaker, and to reduce the length of stay.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all TF-TAVR cases performed at our center between January 2015 and December 2017. The FAST strategy consisted of local anesthesia with conscious sedation, echocardiographically guided TF puncture for main vascular access, radial approach for secondary arterial access, and left ventricular guidewire rapid pacing. Patients were sorted according to the initial strategy (FAST vs standard). The primary outcome was an early safety composite outcome including all-cause mortality, all stroke, life-threatening bleeding, acute kidney injury, coronary artery obstruction, major vascular complication, and valve-related dysfunction.

Results: A total of 285 consecutive patients were included in the present analysis (76 FAST patients and 209 standard patients). There were no baseline differences between groups. Complete FAST procedure was feasible in 83.0% of cases and all FAST procedures were successful. The primary outcome was significantly lower in the FAST group (1.3% vs 14.3%; P<.001). The use of FAST protocol resulted in a reduction of major bleeding (1.3% vs 10.1%; P=.01), blood transfusion (2.6% vs 14.3%; P<.01), and vascular complications related to the secondary access (0.0% vs 5.3%; P=.04). The length of stay was also significantly lower in the FAST group (4.9 days vs 6.4 days; P<.01).

Conclusions: FAST can be safely performed and is associated with lower rates of iatrogenic complications and a shorter length of stay.

Keywords: TAVR; minimalist approach; minimally invasive; radial approach; transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources